- Joined
- Feb 21, 2004
- Messages
- 21,025
- Reaction score
- 7,436
My point still stands. It is a fact that almost no hand-to-hand combat takes place on the battlefield which is now, always has been and always will be ruled by weapons. Even before gun powder made it's way into the hands of warmongers people still fought with edged weapons and on horseback. Once a person was without his weapons and facing an enemy who had his weaponry intact it was over. He either was killed or became a prisoner. This is how it is today as well. Thus, it is still my understanding that the Martial Arts were formulated by commoners for commoners.
You see this is the big bone of contention for me because martial arts includes all forms of fighting training including weapons which means that they include soldiers too not just commoners. If you think martial arts only means hand to hand then your point makes more sense but then I'd disagree that martial arts only mean hand to hand.