- Joined
- Jul 9, 2008
- Messages
- 26,630
- Reaction score
- 9,334
If I reported your comment where you called me a bitch you would get carded as well lmao. You have no logic.
you probably got carded for being one
If I reported your comment where you called me a bitch you would get carded as well lmao. You have no logic.
He should've taken the bait and said it. Lmao.
This was Joe Rogan's biggest mistake. Apologizing to these clowns. nothing he said was wrong, it was perfectly in context.
but apologizing to these morons will only fuel their self-righteous fire.
lol at him backtracking on the black people are apes joke
"i know it sounds like i was trying to be racist when i said africa is planet of the apes and the black neighbourhood i went to is planet of the apes because there was no white people there but it was just a prank bro"
You should have seen the comment section when this video came out. It was as if you were on stormfront. I don't know about you, but I don't to fuck with people with this type of ideology.
Please share what he said that is wrong. Here is the best review I've seen of how it started and what the real facts are.
It was funny that he complained about not being allowed to say it, then given a pass to say it then said I don't want to .
So why you talking about it? News guy got shooked lol.
I watched the video and looked over the study briefly. I don't see that he's wrong, but this isn't a simple matter of right and wrong either. The doctor there said for some shots, with some men , in some age categories. So we need to be specific when we're talking about this.
The problem with Rogan and his show isn't so much about right or wrong, it's that they're not having the conversation in a responsible way, and with responsible actors.
Rogan says, "I saw this one study..." and then another guy says "well i saw this study", and then try to research it on the fly as if either of you are doctors, or are in the field and have a firm grasp on the information that you're putting out to other people isn't good.
I'm not saying that he can't or shouldn't talk about this stuff, but that he, and his guests should be knowledgeable and prepared if they're going to have these kinds of conversations.
A lot of this stuff isn't a simple matter of correct or incorrect.
I watched the video and looked over the study briefly. I don't see that he's wrong, but this isn't a simple matter of right and wrong either. The doctor there said for some shots, with some men , in some age categories. So we need to be specific when we're talking about this.
The problem with Rogan and his show isn't so much about right or wrong, it's that they're not having the conversation in a responsible way, and with responsible actors.
Rogan says, "I saw this one study..." and then another guy says "well i saw this study", and then try to research it on the fly as if either of you are doctors, or are in the field and have a firm grasp on the information that you're putting out to other people isn't good.
I'm not saying that he can't or shouldn't talk about this stuff, but that he, and his guests should be knowledgeable and prepared if they're going to have these kinds of conversations.
A lot of this stuff isn't a simple matter of correct or incorrect.
The "experts" and "doctors" studying this are wrong or the "science changes" all the time as well. Now somehow in democrat states people no longer have to wear masks except for kids at almost no risk inside of schools. The truth is that the science behind wearing a cloth mask all the time was never really all that good or convincing and we never saw any good real world data of declining transmission rates once mask mandates were enacted yet we were told that it was a conspiracy theory or covid denier or that you would kill people for questioning it for over two years. Magically as the spring starts to return and cold/flu/covid season goes away all of the polices that were the most strict will remove the mandate and most normal and ordinary people will not wear the mask if they are no longer "forced" to because most people have already had the virus and already have antibodies, realized the virus was not that harmful to them, or have gotten vaccinated if they were truly worried about it and people are ready to move on after two years.
The numbers here aren't 100% wrong, or 0% wrong. Have the experts and doctors been totally wrong?
Obviously, in a case of a global pandemic with a virus that isn't well understood at the time, they're going to be more cautious.
There's obviously a lot of things to balance and consider, and these institutions can't just roll the dice on stuff like this.
I'd much rather people focus their energy on holding these institutions accountable so that they'll be better instead of making this whole thing political and turning it into a 'my doctor is better than your doctor' bullshit.
Because then everyone has their own 'truth", so no one has truth.
It isn't a game. And welcome to science and novel viruses where it's impossible for you to have all of the correct answers on demand.If we play that game, people should not be censored for "misinformation" since so many things are "misinformation" now.
We were told at first that the virus was not that big of a deal, closing the border is racist, the WHO was not sure of how the virus spread, than we were told an infection fatality rate that was nowhere close to accurate, than told we didn't need masks, than told we did, than when the vaccine came out that the vaccinated no longer needed them because the vaccine was almost 100% effective against infection, that everyone even the really healthy and at low risk and children need to get the vaccine to stop the spread and end the pandemic, than later 96% effective, than later breakthrough cases were rare, than later we need to all wear masks again, than later the vaccine wanes, than later that you need to get a booster, than later that the vaccine does not prevent spread, that the vaccine is almost 100% effective against hospitalization and death and severe cases, and later that 2 vaccines is only 57% effective against hospitalization's so get the booster to be 90% protected, and than later wait the hospitalization and death count is wrong because it's counting incidental cases where people test positive but did not die or go to the hospital due to covid related issues or symptoms.
Do you see how much became "misinformation" or the science changed? We should not have silenced anyone in that case because over the course of the "pandemic" people were getting censored or shutdown or punished who later turned out to be right even though at the time they were "wrong".
It isn't a game. And welcome to science and novel viruses where it's impossible for you to have all of the correct answers on demand.
There is a big difference between the CDC , the WHO, and then 10, 000 other random doctors with all of their own random opinions. Institutions are necessary for large scale events.
Just because the institutions have fucked up, that doesn't mean they're totally useless. Would we have been better off with, or without them?
I'm fine with going hard on the CDC, Fauci, etc. But the answer to holding them accountable isn't going to quack doctors, grifters, and comedians for the "truth"