In the 1970s and 1980s, Israel provided funding and assistance to Ahmed Yassin, a Muslim Brotherhood member who later founded Hamas, as a means of undermining the secular, left-wing Palestinian factions that made up the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO)
Sherbro, we can come to a common understanding that Hamas is evil and should be wiped out. But to defend Netanyahu and his radical government members who are on record to say they don't want and never wanted a 2 state solution, supporting Hamas as a means to undermine the Palestinian Authority and preventing the establishment of a Palestinian state...it just shows that you aren't willing to meet halfway to a real solution.
Hamas needs to be wiped out and Netanyahu needs to be held responsible for his crimes and incompetence.
Even if you do give him the benefit of the doubt and disagree with what I just said, at the very least shouldn't he be held responsible for his actions indirectly contributing to the Hamas' growth and militarization, ultimately posing the threat to Israeli security and the actions of Oct 7.
If my leader failed to defend the nation, whether he had the best of intentions or not is irrelevant, he failed at his job yes? So shouldn't he be gone from his role if the people held their leaders accountable?