except there is. you see that little 4 footnote next to the statement? it's a 3% difference. so instead of your 53% mizrahi/52% non-mizrahi estimate, it's 50% mizrahi and 52% non. so a majority-european jewish ethnostate, as i've always said.
Except you are fucking retarded dude lmao. That's only for the second and first generations, for the generations 2.5 and 3, which make up 30% of the study, there's no official figure:
It is difficult to evaluate the representativeness of the sample since no official statistics are available on the third generation, in general, and its ethnic composition, in particular. Also, mixed ethnicity is not separately captured in official data so there are no good population statistics for comparison.
For first- and second-generation immigrants, official statistics show that immigrants from Asia and Africa (15 years and over) constitute 47% of the Jewish population (ICBS 2017,Table 2.6), whereas the sample figure for Mizrahi and Ethiopian Jews combined (excluding the third generation) is 50%
So, a portion of the sample has some small difference with some census data, in the 1st and 2nd gen. But that's 3 points of the 1st and 2nd gen, not of the total sample,, and also doesn't account for mixed people in any way, because the census doesn't even measure that. And we already mentioned that the 1st generation is overrepresented in the sample, so the difference is likely even smaller. So, at most, 3% of 70%, at most around 2% of the total, maybe differs with the census data. The rest doesn't, because there is no official data to compare. For all we know, the other part of the sample may underestimate, overestimate, or anything else. If you weren't retarded, and had ever studied an academic paper, you would understand that. Also, how the fuck are you getting 50% vs 52%?
Again, by your own logic, where mixed counts for both categories:
45% mizrahi (Take away 2 points, if you want to) + 3% Ethiopean + 8% mixed = 54% - 56%. What in the fuck are you talking about? Why do you include mixed in European ancestry, but not in Middle Eastern ancestry, when they are both? You're desperate as shit lol. By your own logic, it is clear that the majority of Jews in Israel have direct and recent Asian/African ancestry.
Not to mention that your whole argument is pure retardation because 20% of Israel is not even Jewish LOL. So, if we take Israel as a whole, the percentage of people with Middle Eastern/African ancestry and an Israeli passport is +60%. But even just taking Jews alone, your assertion is false.
it's alright brother. we all respond to 5 posts in 20 minutes then pretend we never saw the response annihilating us, waiting a whole day to formulate a response. take your time. we all have lives after all, except when relentlessly quoting a dude who's factually correct.
Why would I waste more time on a Sunday night, knowing that you will never admit you're wrong, when I have to wake up early on Moday to, you know, work, responding to a fucking idiot in a karate forum who says:
ain't no way i'm reading the rest of this.
You can't read, you can't do math, you make stupid disingenuous arguments, when you lose an argument you say "I'm not reading that" (lmao), you troll incessantly and retardedly, and you make no sense in the slightest , just like the dumb terrorists you love so much, and who will continue to lose wars for the rest of their existence and perpetually get their asses handed to them, in the same way I just did with you in this here karate forum.
truthout.org
en.m.wikipedia.org
