i'm quoting the UN, genius. they specifically state that's what hamas did on 10/7.
no you're a big brained centrist who doesn't have any morals or opinions and thinks they're better than everyone because they play both sides. grow a set of nuts and believe in something for once.
would you classify homicide as "evil"? would you classify 800 as "lesser" than 43,000? i'm simply choosing the lesser of two evils.
Don't forget to check out Saint Anns Street off of Bourbon Street while you're there since you'll probably be looking to get the most out of the trans scene that exists there.
Provide a source for those numbers in a camp because the rations don't match those figures at all.
Yes.....But Gaza's population has been increasing, its population has been decreasing during a war like most that do, dummy.
You are too dumb enough to be this smug....I just explained why and you give a cucked 5% increase in chance, again look at the numbers if they were just going on a rampage trying to kill civilians, the numbers would be a helluva a lot higher.
Hyperbole, nice like your inflated 100k figure and the claim that they kill 50 terrorists and 10k civilians
Best case scenario, he is just an obnoxious idiot. Worst case scenario, he is a dishonest creep because of the mental gymnastics that he is doing here. He wants us to directly post a rape video for proof.
And if anyone actually does post a video that involves rape they get banned so he's essentially asking posters to suicide themselves to prove something that's already pretty obvious.
I am not a centrist, jesus christ, I am a liberal that doesn't just jump to whatever positions are trendy and I don't think I am better than everyone. I just try to be as well informed as I can be if that makes you feel bad about yourself, maybe try learning more about the conflict instead of jumping to new conclusions with sloppy evidence. I have more morals than you do. So fuck off with that virtue signaling bullshit when you are gagging on the balls of Hezbollah and Hamas and being a rape apologist.
Lol whatta retarded response. I already answered your question. Maybe this will help you understand it.
www.timesofisrael.com
I think he is just loud and dumb...atleast thats what I hope. I have repeated the same things to him ad-nauseum and it still doesn't seep into this thick skull that deaths are not the only metric to measure a war.
and there are jews in palestine. israel has killed almost as many jews since october 7th as hamas did on october 7th.
You know there are Arabs in Israel right......
my number was a guess. there are 1,700,000 refugees in gaza and just less than 20,000 members of hamas total. that's 85-1 at most right there, if you assume 100% of hamas fighters are mixing in with refugees in camps.
what the hell are you even trying to say here? yeah populations go down during genocide. what?
the numbers are absolutely astronomical and you are claiming it's not genocide because it could be worse? a slobbering retard take if i've ever heard one.
what percentage of hamas do you think is currently mingling in refugee camps? remember, the highest you can possibly go at a 100% clip is an 8500 to 100 civilian/hamas ratio.
So what should Israel do? Let Hamas recalibrate for another October 7th and repeat the cycle?
Basically. They want to kick the can down the road so we can have another century of never ending war or hopefully Israel will finally get finished off.
Don't forget...
The game MUST be played or you lose from the get-go. Yeah, it sucks, but that's how American politics is. Once you gain the power, then you control the faucets.
But you MUST win first.
"Just WIN baby!"
- Al Davis, Okland Raiders owner (R.I.P.)
so a centrist. fucking incredible.
your morals don't exist. you play the middle so you can talk down on both sides like a poli-sci freshman.
you realize they, because they have to, are including genocides and war crimes in those numbers yeah? armed conflicts from 2011-2020 would include the genocide in sudan, boko haram, myanmar ethnic cleansing, etc.Lol whatta retarded response. I already answered your question. Maybe this will help you understand it.
wide comparative historical analysis suggests a (conservative) ratio of 1:1 on average. Crucially, however, in urban warfare the ratios climb very sharply. The Washington DC-based Center for Civilians in Conflict reports that “In cities […] civilians account for 90 percent of the casualties during war.” Similarly, in its global survey of armed conflicts from 2011 to 2020, the NGO Action on Armed Violence found that “91% of those reported killed or injured by explosive weapons in populated areas were civilians.” Even when attacks were “explicitly coded as targeting armed actors” specifically, civilian casualties in populated areas still accounted for 69%. The (less than) 1:1.1 ratio of combatant-to-civilian casualties of war in the inordinately densely populated Gaza Strip is astonishingly low in historical comparison. Not only is this conceptually incompatible with genocide – it is its very polar opposite.
Notice also that since the 1:1.1 ratio is inordinately low compared to the norm in urban warfare, then even if, hypothetically, the final true numbers turn out to be doubly worse, they would still be low in historical comparison and therefore incompatible even with a prima facie suspicion of genocide.
The genocide claim against Israel doesn’t add up
The ratio of combatant-to-civilian casualties in Gaza should be recognized as a historical achievement of protecting civilian lives
I am done talking to you. You don't address any of my points and just gish gallop. I am convinced you have a mental disability or trolling so I'll let you be at this pont because this discussion is beyond your champagne socialist comprehension of the world.
that's what israel has guaranteed will happen. they have successfully radicalized hundreds of thousands of people in gaza.
What do you see so bad to being a centrist? The extreme elements of the left and right are the reason people are fucking fighting all the time and we have so much division and nothing gets done. Of course not every issue is going to have a middle ground but it's like you people thrive on this hatred.
because it both shows a lack of character and passion, and will lead to absolutely nothing getting done ever. you need a moral code to make moral decisions. if your only moral code is "let's meet somewhere in the middle" you will only prolong conflict.
