- Joined
- Mar 14, 2015
- Messages
- 8,504
- Reaction score
- 5,017
1. I called it a rumor. In the section you quoted.
2. I have a source too, saying the opposite of GSP. You know this. Which makes it a classic he said / he said.
3. It was an example. The point I was trying to make (maybe I was too vague) is that rumors are rumors, and just because some folks want it - or even if fighters say they want it - it doesn't necessarily mean fights materialize.
4. There is always a dozen other things going on in the background that influence whether fights get made.
TS spewed out a bunch of rumors, connected those dots, called them fact, ignored counter examples (or my #4, that there are always other factors), and concluded that Dana is an idiot. That's not a reasonable or rational thought process.
I'm sorry you read my post and decided I was attacking GSP and that you needed to defend him. That wasn't my agenda.
It's a rumour from a known liar vs the word of a classy gentleman like GSP.
I didn't say you were attacking gsp. You were more than happy to talk about the rumour that gsp turned down Silva many times but ignored GSP's version which was he was never offered it during his run.
If you were truly unbias you would have presented both sides. You did not.
Also the fact that you decided that I think you are attacking GSP tells me you were, that didn't even cross my mind. I was just telling you what gsp said