I am not wasting my time on this nonsense. I am not looking at some gotchas like some of you.
Okay, let's waste our time on huge multiquotes instead.
It's not. Repeatedly showing kids who are that way at all times is cynical and wrong. Like I said there's plenty of suffering in Gaza. How much suffering there is I don't know and neither do any of you. Even the cited numbers admit that it's all guesswork.
Are they that way at all times? Or are some of them seeing their condition worsen due to the hunger crisis?
I forget in what context I said it but I did make the point there's likely a higher level of genetic disorders due to cousin marriage. You don't think that's a fair statement?
Again I didn't say it negates issues of starvation or possible hunger issues, I said it partially explains the issue of genetic disorders.
In the context of that exchange that was referred no one was talking about genetic disorders, they were talking about the hunger crisis from lack of aid and you bring up cousin marriage and genetic disorders as the alternative explanation and that the hunger crisis is being exaggerated. That was exactly what was claimed about the exchange even though you complained that it was misrepresented.
I am not even shitting on them for the cousin marriage. I am saying it as a statement of fact. The same could probably be said of the Amish, Mennonites or Hasidic Jews but I doubt you'll be going to bat for them and strawmanning what I say to this extent...
Don't assume of me what's true of you.
So you acknowledge all that then still pretend that having a level of skepticism is completely out of line.
I never said having skepticism is out of line, I said the opposite earlier.
There's a lot of propaganda going both ways in this conflict and some skepticism around claims of heinous war crimes committed with extreme malice is not necessarily unreasonable on his part.
But I certainly don't get the sense that this is a person who has sympathy for the plight of the Palestinians, quite the opposite really.
I am not hand waving the atrocities. I acknowledged at least some of the things you deem 'atrocities'. I also acknowledged that some of it is exacerbated by Hamas's tactics of using civilian emergency vehicles, not wearing uniforms, fighting among civilians, etc etc etc.
Do you acknowledge that Israel is to blame for the current hunger crisis in Gaza?
I am not callous. I see the conflict for what it is. I have my biases sure.
You do come off pretty callous when talking about the Palestinians.
That's right it's not your job to do anything. You just 'misread' what I have to say to virtue signal and grandstand here when the answer to the question you asked me several times is staring you in the face and that you answered yourself.
What did I misread?
Palestinians are an invention in the sense that every people are an invention. Palestinians are just a more recent invention if we borrow your language. They are absolutely Jordanians, Egyptians, Syrians and Lebanese.
This is ahistorical Zionist propaganda. Even if you don't accept what Benny Morris says, that the Palestinian identity dates back to the 1920s during the Mandatory Period, its nonsensical to say it started in the late 80s and 90s when the Palestinians are brought under Israeli occupation in 1967. Palestinians are Jordanians and Syrians in the same way Israelis are Polish or Russian.
You expect me to go through thousands of pages to settle this nonsense? No thanks. There's a reason you barely recall taking issue of one thing I said over this entire time.
Okay.
Again the sympathy answer is staring you in the face.
You're getting closer. It's so obvious.
It may seem that way to you but not from where I'm standing.
Yet all the Palestinian supporters will be quick to point to some Israeli poll saying they want to murder and eat every Palestinian.
While you were technically correct that Bush was still more popular or whatever the actual answer was, Palestinians disproportionately supported Hamas after Oct 7th. This doesn't help your case here as much as you think.
See you're doing the thing again, pounding the table on the Palestinian stats while hand waiving away the ones on Israelis. Israeli Jews are also very radicalized, don't forget that.
The answer of sympathy is so obvious...and yes I have lots of it for the Palestinian people who are trapped between a rock and hard place.
Okay, doesn't come off that way at all though.
You are not wrong here to some extent however Oct 7th was beyond the pale. Most other resistance groups know the limits and typically don't go beyond them.
Okay and Israel trying to starve Gaza is also beyond the pale but will you call that out?
It's funny you bring up Gvir and Smotrich and state they are an afterthought as far as their influence during elections. Yet they are brought up time and again as representative of all Israelis. They are the Israeli versions of MTG.
I didn't say they are an afterthought in terms of their influence, do not misread or twist my words. They are very powerful because coalition politics allows even small parties to play kingmaker and wield far more influence than their vote share would suggest and that's exactly what's happening now. Do you really deny that Ben-Gvir and Smotrich are very influential right now?
My point transcends even Hamas. Palestinians have waged wars long before Hamas, lost them, lost lands, faced more repression and so on. Sure most of the Gazans didn't vote for them but by and large they supported them unless you're now going to claim those polls and surveys were done under duress.
If you really think an election from 20 years ago where the majority of the current population could not vote and where Hamas did not win a majority tells us that today the Palestinians support Hamas then idk what to tell you because that is quite the reach. And as I said if you want to dig up polls and election results Israelis don't come out looking very good either but you won't acknolwedge that will you?
There's zero charade here. I am truthfully sympathetic to their plight. The answer is staring you in the face.
Okay but like I said it certainly doesn't come off that way to me.
I deleted this comment but since you already read/quoted it, you jump on the posters with whom you ideologically disagree while pretending you don't see the KAZ type comments.
I haven't even jumped on the other Zionist posters ITT, I'm only exchanging with you right now. You try to present yourself as some moderate but you actually regurgitate some pretty extreme Zionist rhetoric like this idea that Palestinians came into being in the 1980s. Its basically the Zionist equivalent of "Israelis are Europeans!" from the Palestinian side. If someone was trying to frame themselves as a moderate while saying Israelis are basically Europeans I don't think you'd let that slide and rightfully so.
The answer is so simple.
Should I do a couple analogies without you saying I am equating Palestinian people to what am I about to say? I have used analogies, sarcasm, humor, etc in the past but it seems it is hit and miss when people go out of their way to misunderstand me.
I sympathize with many low income incarcerated people who end up living the life of crime or ending up behind bars when had they been better financially well off they wouldn't be. However despite my sympathy would I want to live in a building full of felons? No. Does that make me unsympathetic to the system inequality in the American justice system and the incarcerated people?
I sympathize with the struggles foster youth face. They face so many challenges. Their lives are very hard. However would I want to adopt foster youths? Probably not. Does that make me unsympathetic to them?
I sympathize with the plight of the American veterans. Would I want to have a veteran with PTSD living across from me and screaming in his sleep every night? No. Am I unsympathetic to the plight of the American veterans who have PTSD?
I am sympathetic to the plight of the 'unhoused' people in the US...would I want them settled in my building? No because I've seen what that often results in...am I unsympathetic to the plight of the homeless people?
So to make my point crystal clear....I sympathize with the Palestinian people in a broad sense. They are stuck between a rock and hard place both in Gaza and West Bank and face endless bullshit from both Israel/settlers and their governments of Hamas and PA respectively. However per your own admission many of them have been radicalized(you have examples of such people coming out of the woodwork even recently with some strong antisemitic sentiments. Some have lost their residency status or got in serious trouble over it. There were examples in US, UK, Australia, etc.) and thus I wouldn't want to live next to them. I am all about giving people grace as you say but I am also a realist/pragmatist. It is why I am in favor of the Palestinian people forming their own nation state.
I hope I drove my point home. Let me know if I need to think of some more examples of how someone can be sympathetic yet also pragmatic at the same time...
I didn't need your half baked analogies but thanks anyway I guess.
My point is that while you say you "sympathize with the Palestinian people in a broad sense" it comes off like crocodile tears because your posts generally come off as disdainful of the Palestinians. You see them as driven by blind hatred instead of having sympathy for their grievances, you see them as more or less a fake nation who are no different from their Arab neighbors, and your first thought when seeing that some of them might get refugee status in Britain isn't "how great that some might escape" but rather to assume the worst of them off the bat. No one is asking you to house a Palestinian refugee in your house but unless you live in the UK if your first reaction to some Palestinians getting refugee status there is basically "fuck em, wouldn't want em near me" you don't come off as very sympathetic. Is that really hard for you to understand? That maybe your posts don't come off the way you intend given your choice of words and what you tend to emphasize? You will say things like "I have broad sympathy for Palestinians" seemingly as a perfunctory concession despite the fact that the rest of your posting suggests the opposite.