- Joined
- Aug 13, 2006
- Messages
- 29,691
- Reaction score
- 12,506
The assassinations provided justification to those claiming that Israel's gov wanted to prolong the war as a priority and was not committed to freeing hostages and were actively sabotaging negotiations or were negotiating in bad faith. Nobody gives a fuck about Hamas leadership getting killed per se, if anything people wanted them dead the most.I don't really care if Israel takes out some leaders living in Qatar. I don't think anything would be notably different had they still been alive.
Sieges have been used historically to break resistance. It's not pretty but it's effective. Not sure if this would have been my approach but I do understand it.
It's amazing to me that we're at a point where the winning side is being told to stop simply due to the whining by the losing side (when the losing side started the war)..I can't recall any other war or conflict like this...
Re seiges, they are routinely condemned for creating conditions for civilians that are incompatible with international law and human rights. It's not Israel specific. The moment they declared that intention there was outcry because starvation was easily foreseeable and well known.
Nobody cares if Hamas whines. The concern lies around the civilian population, comprised mostly of young people (average age is 20 years old). People are sick of seeing dusty emaciated dead kids being carried out of collapsed buildings by crying mothers and fathers.
Last edited: