Great Pyramid at Giza - BIG New Chamber(s) Found In

it is the work of masters. Very little to no mortar usage at all. Extremely impressive. It is peculiar that though solid stone and not a composite (Ie, cement), it almost as the appearance in areas of a liquid solidifying, like the stones were somehow heated and shaped. The odd shaped stones in areas are perfect fits for those next to them. We see the same thing at Sacsayhuayman which is a larger scale project than Machu Picchu and incredibly impressive in scale.

This is almost as difficult to understand as anything in the ancient world...well beyond what we know of as the Inca capability. The giant blocks seem to melt into each other.

sarah-by-the-blocks-of-sasqwayman.jpg

Yeah I've seen this pictures, and this is exactly what I mean. Beautiful and unsettling.

The kind of thing that tells you without question our massive portions of our history on this planet is either unknown or being hidden.
 
That shit is inexplicable. This is known as the 12 angle stone. Do you have any idea how difficult it would be to measure all those angles and then cut them out precisely using hand tools?

cusco-11.jpg
It is exceptional stone artwork. I have heard it proposed that the irregularity creates a better defense against earthquakes but I'm not an expert in that. There must be a functional reason as that is making the job insanely difficult necessarily if you already know how to cut the stone that precisely...as they clearly did. The other idea is that it was just so easy to do for them that they wanted to make it look like that for aesthetics, which I doubt is the case.
 
That shit is inexplicable. This is known as the 12 angle stone. Do you have any idea how difficult it would be to measure all those angles and then cut them out precisely using hand tools?

cusco-11.jpg

It looks like all those big stones in that pic all have small outcrops on them, I'm assuming for carrying or placing the stones?
 
That shit is inexplicable. This is known as the 12 angle stone. Do you have any idea how difficult it would be to measure all those angles and then cut them out precisely using hand tools?

cusco-11.jpg

The why is what gets me, why the f would you cut stone likenthat. Makes zero sense
 
It is exceptional stone artwork. I have heard it proposed that the irregularity creates a better defense against earthquakes but I'm not an expert in that. There must be a functional reason as that is making the job insanely difficult necessarily if you already know how to cut the stone that precisely...as they clearly did. The other idea is that it was just so easy to do for them that they wanted to make it look like that for aesthetics, which I doubt is the case.

They fit these massive stone together without the use of mortar. They fit together so perfectly in some cases you can't get a piece of paper in between them.

peru-inca-wall.jpg


I mean fuck me, look at the precision of the cuts on these stones, and we aren't talking about soft stone. In many cases these are extremely hard types of granite and diorite and other really hard to cut stones that a modern mason would use pneumatic tools on.

th


IMG_9187.jpg
 
The why is what gets me, why the f would you cut stone likenthat. Makes zero sense

Seriously, its a stupid hard set of cuts to make in a stupidly hard piece of rock if you are using only hand tools. Look at the cut on the right of the 12 angle stone, that isn't a straight line, that cut has a slight arc in it, maybe only a couple of degrees. They made those cut so precisely the stones fit together with no gap.

cusco-11.jpg
 
It looks like all those big stones in that pic all have small outcrops on them, I'm assuming for carrying or placing the stones?

I don't know, I don't think we do know. I've read quite a bit about these stone walls and I've always wondered what those knobs are and how they got there to begin with.
 
The why is what gets me, why the f would you cut stone likenthat. Makes zero sense

Sure it does, they didn't have interlocking patterns so empirical evidence told them that irregular patterns were less likely to slip, or disjoint.

Don't over think it, crude math and 300 yrs to build something with 10s of thousands of slaves gets a lot of shit done.


OTOH ...

980x.jpg



 
The cultures that built stepped mountains and pyramids also have in common feathered serpent (dragon) worship.

The Andean civilizations of South America (Amaru-ca) have a myth about a feathered serpent (dragon) called Amarus that could go to and fro between the boundaries of the spiritual realm of the subterranean world.

"amarus can be seen emerging from a central element in the center of a stepped mountain or pyramid motif in the Gateway of the Sun at Tiwanaku, Bolivia"

010%20Gateway%20of%20the%20Sun,%20Tiwanaku.jpg

wiracocha.jpg


This myth seems to say that stepped mountains/pyramids were portals used by feathered serpents (dragons) to travel to and from the underworld so could the stepped mountains/pyramids be used to travel/teleport to other stepped mountains/pyramids and could that explain the wide spread dragon worship and megalithic structure building?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quetzalcoatl

Amaru-ca

pyram.gif


The great seal of the Great Red Dragon

Revelation 12:3

And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads.

Revelation 13

1Then I saw a beast with ten horns and seven heads rising out of the sea. There were ten royal crowns on its horns and blasphemous names on its heads. 2The beast I saw was like a leopard, with the feet of a bear and the mouth of a lion. And the dragon gave the beast his power and throne and great authority.

Amurus depiction

AmaruMitoPeru.jpg


"Animals thought to represent Quetzalcoatl include resplendent quetzals, rattlesnakes (coatl meaning serpent in Nahuatl), crows, and macaws. In his form as Ehecatl he is the wind, and is represented by spider monkeys, ducks, and the wind itself.[10] In his form as the morning star, Venus, he is also depicted as a harpy eagle.[11] In Mazatec legends, the astrologer deity Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, who is also represented by Venus, bears a close relationship with Quetzalcoatl."


rattlesnake with 666 in its coiled body
don__t_tread_on_me_by_vekticolor-d4w6gro.png


Eagle on back of dollar bill opposite stepped mountain/pyramid

eagle-seal-dollar-bill-11004510.jpg


Isaiah 14

How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!

Lucifer-
Light-bringer, the Latin name of the morning-star, or "son of the morning."

The book of Enoch tells of angels descending from heaven to the summit of Mount Hermon.

"And Semjâzâ, who was their leader, said unto them: "I fear ye will not indeed agree to do this deed, and I alone shall have to pay the penalty of a great sin." And they all answered him and said: "Let us all swear an oath, and all bind ourselves by mutual imprecations not to abandon this plan but to do this thing." Then sware they all together and bound themselves by mutual imprecations upon it. And they were in all two hundred; who descended in the days of Jared on the summit of Mount Hermon, and they called it Mount Hermon, because they had sworn and bound themselves by mutual imprecations upon it."

These angels were then punished by being thrown into the abyss or underworld.

Kind of interesting that dragon worshipers believe dragons can travel between the underworld and the earth via man made mountains/pyramids.

So Yeah.


"SATAN"
The-Ancient-Aliens-Guy-And-The-Ancient-Astronaut-Theory.png
 
I don't know, I don't think we do know. I've read quite a bit about these stone walls and I've always wondered what those knobs are and how they got there to begin with.
They are really interesting. It makes no sense but I still feel like it looks like these stones were molded in some way. I know that is not how it works but...
 
They fit these massive stone together without the use of mortar. They fit together so perfectly in some cases you can't get a piece of paper in between them.

peru-inca-wall.jpg


I mean fuck me, look at the precision of the cuts on these stones, and we aren't talking about soft stone. In many cases these are extremely hard types of granite and diorite and other really hard to cut stones that a modern mason would use pneumatic tools on.

th


IMG_9187.jpg

Doesn't seem that difficult. I imagine the stones are cut to those planes from front to back. That would make it way easier than a graduated 3D Matrix.
 
t
They fit these massive stone together without the use of mortar. They fit together so perfectly in some cases you can't get a piece of paper in between them.

peru-inca-wall.jpg


I mean fuck me, look at the precision of the cuts on these stones, and we aren't talking about soft stone. In many cases these are extremely hard types of granite and diorite and other really hard to cut stones that a modern mason would use pneumatic tools on.

th


IMG_9187.jpg
someone was just straight up trolling the future.
 
Yeah I've seen this pictures, and this is exactly what I mean. Beautiful and unsettling.

The kind of thing that tells you without question our massive portions of our history on this planet is either unknown or being hidden.
I understand your general sentiment and we agree for the most part, however I don't the highlighted above is helpful to the cause of promoting new ideas. I think we are generally just in the dark about this stuff, and you'd have to come up with a reason why someone would even want to hide anything on a topic like this. Of course it is disturbing to think that a somewhat advanced culture may have arisen that we don't really have a record of (Ie, what the hell happened) but I can't think that would be a reason to hide anything. I think generally the past is just really murky.
 
They are really interesting. It makes no sense but I still feel like it looks like these stones were molded in some way. I know that is not how it works but...

Yea in some places it looks like they were heated and poured into molds.

incawall.jpg


Peru_-_Cusco_014b_-_Inca_wall_(7084752541).jpg


I can't even really comprehend the amount of work involved to make this work. Hear me out on this. In the pic above, you would lay the bottom row of 3 stones first, then in the middle row, the center stone cuts into 2 of the stones from the bottom row so that the stones from the top row will fit together properly. I can't even work out how they could have done this unless they knew the placement and shape of every stone BEFORE they even started.
 
I understand your general sentiment and we agree for the most part, however I don't the highlighted above is helpful to the cause of promoting new ideas. I think we are generally just in the dark about this stuff, and you'd have to come up with a reason why someone would even want to hide anything on a topic like this. Of course it is disturbing to think that a somewhat advanced culture may have arisen that we don't really have a record of (Ie, what the hell happened) but I can't think that would be a reason to hide anything. I think generally the past is just really murky.

Have you ever heard of Randall Carlson? Or Graham Hancock? I think those two guys have done amazing research into the concept that Earth has not only had one reset but multiple resets where entire civilizations were wiped out that we have no record of. That may explain where some of these ancient cultures learned how to do things, is that there were civilizations that came before them that got blanked by an asteroid or something.

Hancock and Carlson have been on the Rogan podcast multiple times and I've probably listened to them talk at least 6 hours, some of it absolutely fascinating.

Here is one of their podcasts, its long, but yea if you like this sort of thing its a great listen.

 
Have you ever heard of Randall Carlson? Or Graham Hancock? I think those two guys have done amazing research into the concept that Earth has not only had one reset but multiple resets where entire civilizations were wiped out that we have no record of. That may explain where some of these ancient cultures learned how to do things, is that there were civilizations that came before them that got blanked by an asteroid or something.

Hancock and Carlson have been on the Rogan podcast multiple times and I've probably listened to them talk at least 6 hours, some of it absolutely fascinating.

Here is one of their podcasts, its long, but yea if you like this sort of thing its a great listen.


I'm well of aware of these two gentlemen. I think Graham is excellent compiler of data and good with the big picture though he goes a bit too far sometimes. I've read fingerprints, underworld and magicians of the gods (the latter is probably the least compelling though still good) I tend to agree with him on most things. Randall is exceptionally well versed in a myriad of topics and is currently compiling a book I'm looking forward to very much (as is Graham, his on the Americas). If you've ever read any of Randall's articles on Tunguska, flooding, etc...you soon realize just how in depth his knowledge base is. He's as well versed as pretty much any PHD in geology and earth history, and that is not an exaggeration.

Randall's GeoCosmic Rex page is the shit...

https://www.youtube.com/user/YSIproductions
 
I understand your general sentiment and we agree for the most part, however I don't the highlighted above is helpful to the cause of promoting new ideas. I think we are generally just in the dark about this stuff, and you'd have to come up with a reason why someone would even want to hide anything on a topic like this. Of course it is disturbing to think that a somewhat advanced culture may have arisen that we don't really have a record of (Ie, what the hell happened) but I can't think that would be a reason to hide anything. I think generally the past is just really murky.

I'll clear up that sentence by saying I mean hidden in a shitty, status quo-supporting-academia-driven sense. Not an evil mega-conspiratorial sense.

I'd not be surprised to see researchers and historians gloss over or ignore evidence that contradicts certain aspects of popularly accepted history. Maybe it's because they are invested in the current narrative of human history in some fashion, maybe they are lazy, maybe they are just pos, maybe anything. It happens, we've brushed the topic in this thread in regards to Egyptology, even the Smithsonian has repressed information in its history.
 
I'll clear up that sentence by saying I mean hidden in a shitty, status quo-supporting-academia-driven sense. Not an evil mega-conspiratorial sense.

I'd not be surprised to see researchers and historians gloss over or ignore evidence that contradicts certain aspects of popularly accepted history. Maybe it's because they are invested in the current narrative of human history in some fashion, maybe they are lazy, maybe they are just pos, maybe anything. It happens, we've brushed the topic in this thread in regards to Egyptology, even the Smithsonian has repressed information in its history.
thanks for the clarification, we are on exactly the same page then. The status quo is often a huge impediment in this area of inquiry.
 
I'm well of aware of these two gentlemen. I think Graham is excellent compiler of data and good with the big picture though he goes a bit too far sometimes. I've read fingerprints, underworld and magicians of the gods (the latter is probably the least compelling though still good) I tend to agree with him on most things. Randall is exceptionally well versed in a myriad of topics and is currently compiling a book I'm looking forward to very much (as is Graham, his on the Americas). If you've ever read any of Randall's articles on Tunguska, flooding, etc...you soon realize just how in depth his knowledge base is. He's as well versed as pretty much any PHD in geology and earth history, and that is not an exaggeration.

Randall's GeoCosmic Rex page is the shit...

https://www.youtube.com/user/YSIproductions

No I haven't read any of Hancock's books but I have listened to him and Carlson speak on these topics for hours. Good stuff and yea thanks for the tip on the Geocosmicrex channel.
 
@andnowweknow

From Carlson's channel I just grabbed a vid to check out some of it. This stuff is awesome. This lecture he was giving was talking about how at the end of the last ice age most of the topography of North America was formed either by the grinding of the ice sheet or the melt water. Like the melt water ran off and followed the edge of the ice sheet forming what we now know as the Ohio River Valley area, just dug it out and that would have been the edge of a major glacier.

North America was covered in mega-fauna which are really large animals like 600 pound beavers, 16 foot tall ground sloths, saber tooth tigers, giant 2000 pound bears, mammoths, etc. and this would have been only about 12,000 years ago. Great watch.

Anyway, the video is called the Ice Age Conundrum which is that when you calculate the size of the ice sheet you know that its melt time is directly proportional to the amount of thermal energy present. In other words, an ice cube melts at different rates of speed determined by how hot it is, its going to melt slower at 33 degrees than at 70 degrees. The conundrum is that the ice sheets melted at a faster rate than they should have or could have. This was first discovered in the 1970's and the mainstream can't explain it but Carlson says its that ole asteroid strike that melted them.

 
Back
Top