• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Social GoldenWolf's COVID Vaccine/Lockdown Protest megathread

Is this reasonable? or a slippery slope?


  • Total voters
    366
Status
Not open for further replies.
Idk, good question. If I had to guess a few theories:
1. It was exaggerated and the powers that be (who are the ones who would organize such a thing anyway) only really cared about profits and control.

2. They don't want to give the impression that the pandemic officially ended.
 
when we achieve zero-covid and the pandemic is over, then we'll mourn the dead. People are still dying, it's too early to mourn
 
Don't do this. We turned a terrible pandemic into a big political issue.
 
Because leftists were busy trying to find out who they voted for so they could celebrate their deaths if they voted for the wrong party.

BTW, the original title for this was "why shouldn't we dance on the graves of anti-vaxxers?" and was edited it thinking that somehow made him less of a POS.

https://www.latimes.com/business/st...ouldnt-we-dance-on-the-graves-of-anti-vaxxers

FIxYIUdX0AMABG1
 
Is it Denial? Is it the hustle and bustle of every day life?
Both. People have a political stake in denying it was serious enough to kill 600,000 people in a year. If this were anything else, like a terrorist attack that killed even, let’s say 3000 people give or take, they would be saying things like “These colors don’t run,” and “Never forget!”
 
when we achieve zero-covid and the pandemic is over, then we'll mourn the dead. People are still dying, it's too early to mourn


Will never happen and if you truly believe that's the case you are a literal child. Thousands still die from the flu every single year, we've never reached 'zero flu' so why would we ever reach 'zero covid'?

Fortunately the vast majority of the world has completely moved on from covid fear. If you personally still wanna live in mild fear of it, or pretend it's still a massive deal, crack on.
 
You are a funny guy.


How old are you?

https://metatron.substack.com/p/soaring-deaths-of-even-younger-americans

"Soaring Deaths of Even Younger Americans.
As bad as the story is for the under 45s, it's a whole lot worse for the under 25s
."


No really sure how anyone can be laughing at the deliberate Malfeasance.

"Let’s examine the core hypotheses I have developed over the last couple of years, based on the examination of reams of mortality data from all around the world:

1- Deaths spike in the aftermath of COVID interventions (government policies) more than they do in the apparent emergence of a novel pathogen.

2- Mortality increases in the aftermath of the mass mRNA experiment more than it does during the alleged emergence of a novel pathogen, “in spite of” the claim that the medical intervention is Safe and Effective™."


You're very welcome to challenge Joel on his data because you'll be the first.


"when the “epidemic” first hits America in mid-March 2020 (i.e. when the older people start dying), the under 25s actually experience negative excess deaths, i.e. fewer die than expected."


So with the hotter variant less kids die


"when the first wave is over by the end of May (the same as it is everywhere in the northern hemisphere), this is the point at which the under 25s start dying in excess. Weird, right? Or maybe, not so weird if it’s the policies killing, not the virus? Does that seems more plausible?"

Previously I put on here a mates mate in Melbourne is on ptsd due to the shear number of youth suicides he had to attend....


"So, by the end of Feb 2021, around 1,200 under 25s have unexpectedly died during the first year of the deadly COVID. Not of the virus but of the policies.

But that’s nowhere near the worst of it. In respect of the second hypothesis, in the second year, 6,000 more youngsters die. That’s 5 times more (excuse the obvious!).

What happened in February 2021
?"


What indeed.

"But there it is again. After jabbing the “priority cases” (the clinically vulnerable) in mid-Dec 2020, the jabfest kicks into gear towards the end of Feb 2021 for the rest of the under 25s, peaking first on 10th Apr. Two months later deaths peak.

There is a second wave of jabbing, peaking 22nd May. Four months later, deaths peak again.

Boosting starts autumn 2021 and by spring 2022, deaths are on the rise again."


Obviously paranoia, pretty happy with my decision to not get that shit and do not know one person that regrets making the same choice and I know people that lost houses and one his family.
 
How old are you?

https://metatron.substack.com/p/soaring-deaths-of-even-younger-americans

"Soaring Deaths of Even Younger Americans.
As bad as the story is for the under 45s, it's a whole lot worse for the under 25s
."


No really sure how anyone can be laughing at the deliberate Malfeasance.

"Let’s examine the core hypotheses I have developed over the last couple of years, based on the examination of reams of mortality data from all around the world:

1- Deaths spike in the aftermath of COVID interventions (government policies) more than they do in the apparent emergence of a novel pathogen.

2- Mortality increases in the aftermath of the mass mRNA experiment more than it does during the alleged emergence of a novel pathogen, “in spite of” the claim that the medical intervention is Safe and Effective™."


You're very welcome to challenge Joel on his data because you'll be the first.


"when the “epidemic” first hits America in mid-March 2020 (i.e. when the older people start dying), the under 25s actually experience negative excess deaths, i.e. fewer die than expected."


So with the hotter variant less kids die


"when the first wave is over by the end of May (the same as it is everywhere in the northern hemisphere), this is the point at which the under 25s start dying in excess. Weird, right? Or maybe, not so weird if it’s the policies killing, not the virus? Does that seems more plausible?"

Previously I put on here a mates mate in Melbourne is on ptsd due to the shear number of youth suicides he had to attend....


"So, by the end of Feb 2021, around 1,200 under 25s have unexpectedly died during the first year of the deadly COVID. Not of the virus but of the policies.

But that’s nowhere near the worst of it. In respect of the second hypothesis, in the second year, 6,000 more youngsters die. That’s 5 times more (excuse the obvious!).

What happened in February 2021
?"


What indeed.

"But there it is again. After jabbing the “priority cases” (the clinically vulnerable) in mid-Dec 2020, the jabfest kicks into gear towards the end of Feb 2021 for the rest of the under 25s, peaking first on 10th Apr. Two months later deaths peak.

There is a second wave of jabbing, peaking 22nd May. Four months later, deaths peak again.

Boosting starts autumn 2021 and by spring 2022, deaths are on the rise again."


Obviously paranoia, pretty happy with my decision to not get that shit and do not know one person that regrets making the same choice and I know people that lost houses and one his family.

Sounds like a load of conspiracy nutcase crap. No offense. I think I will continue to trust in what actually doctors think about it and what I can observe from my own experience and research. The chances that you can have really bad health problems from getting covid while not being vaccinated are indefenetely higher than having long term lasting side effects from taking the shot. And yes I think it's funny what some people choose to believe in, like "youngsters" dropping dead left and right because of the vaccine.
 
Last edited:
Sounds like a load of conspiracy nutcase crap. I think I will continue to trust in what actually doctors think about it and what I can observe from my own experience and research. The chances that you can have really bad health problems from getting covid while not being vaccinated are indefenetely higher than having long term lasting side effects from taking the shot. And yes I think it's funny what some people choose to believe in, like "youngsters" dropping dead left and right because of the vaccine.
<1>

You should “defenetely” keep researching, and take everything you hear from “actually doctors” with a grain of salt.
 
<1>

You should “defenetely” keep researching, and take everything you hear from “actually doctors” with a grain of salt.

I agree with that. You should research any type of medication or vaccine before taking it.

Btw I don't think people should be forced to take it and ideally ofc you don't want to take any vaccine. I took the first shots but won't get any new boosters because I'm kinda living in the woods anyway and don't see a big chance to get infected.
 
Last edited:
Sounds like a load of conspiracy nutcase crap. No offense. I think I will continue to trust in what actually doctors think about it and what I can observe from my own experience and research. The chances that you can have really bad health problems from getting covid while not being vaccinated are indefenetely higher than having long term lasting side effects from taking the shot. And yes I think it's funny what some people choose to believe in, like "youngsters" dropping dead left and right because of the vaccine.


Did you even look at the article because Joel Smalley is a professional statistician that has called out the entire world especially anyone that wants to debate his analysis. I recommend you actually look because the data he uses is whatever country he is showing the true on.


These are the same actual doctors that are recommending remdesivir? For the second time you should actually take 30 minutes and look over everything I have linked

https://palexander.substack.com/p/remdesivir-key-study-in-lancet-april?isFreemail=true

"REMDESIVIR key study in LANCET April 2020 (Wang) swept under the rug by media & Fauci: "Remdesivir in adults with severe COVID-19: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial"
see highlighted passage & numbers and you can see why this study was hidden by Fauci & NIH cabal for with the flawed NIH study, it showed that Remdesivir FAILED in cutting deaths & it increased harms
"

Or just listen to this doctors scathing breakdown of remdesivir and the lies





Your statement is factually incorrect best case scenario a serious adverse reaction is around 1:800 but Germany it was 1:500 for an adverse reaction that needed a doctors help.
I'll take my chances with covid, actually I did and I'm fine. People I know that wherw forced to take this shit weren't so lucky.

Edit- thats injections not the number of people
 
You are a funny guy.

Thanks for the reminder that institutions have installed a dogmatic belief system in the gullible rubes.. peddling fairy tales to the masses..
Good luck dude.. youre going to need it..
 
Thanks for the reminder that institutions have installed a dogmatic belief system in the gullible rubes.. peddling fairy tales to the masses..
Good luck dude.. youre going to need it..

Fairy tales like a vaccine being able to heavily reduce the effects of an infection? What institutions do you think have installed a dogmatic belief system into me? You are also a funny guy. Good luck to you too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top