Walensky says she has 'Covid', one month after supposedly receiving a bivalent shot. This is a short time frame within which the shot should be effective. So if you're a narrative believer, you can arrive to the conclusion that antibody levels are poorly correlated with protection against infection and disease, and therefore the low-quality antibody studies that were used to justify the bivalent shots don't apply. It's been clear for some time that antibody level studies don't mean anything in the real world. It's not the correlate of protection. It's pretty clear they'll keep using these cheap, shitty antibody studies to push more untested jabs. The unthinking masses don't have a problem with it, the media will bombard them with false headlines and they'll buy it. They're not smart enough to question it, and the FDA is obviously very cozy with the pharmaceutical industry and just won't do their job as regulators - they're completely corrupt. Pfizer and Moderna have literally hundreds of billions of dollars, they would do studies if the FDA cracked the whip on them. The FDA just doesn't. The bivalent shot has no studies testing efficacy against infection, or against severe disease, or anything of the sort. That's unacceptable; we're not in an acute phase of the pandemic and you can't push an untested product with no safety information on young people not at risk.
Personally I think the whole official narrative is gobbledygook. It's the Truman Show. None of these officials are getting real jabs, and they're probably not sick with Covid either. I understand the official narrative very well, I just don't think it's real. They're probably having them announce Covid to either keep the illusion of the pandemic going, or perhaps normalize ineffective shots as being something 'normal'.
