"millions have died from covid and millions have not died from the vaccine, so in reality they were actually much more correct than you were, with their predictions closer to being accurate."
This blokes analysis is quite interesting, and tbh its actually how you're supposed to use trail data. A small section of the population is experimented on and the results give a potential indication for the entire population
https://peterhalligan.substack.com/p/20-million-saved-or-20-million-killed
"
The Pfizer clinical trial indicated 0.1% of the injected group (slightly less in the placebo group) died during the 6 month clinical trial, with 24% suffering an adverse event."
Which leads to
"
If we apply the 6 month clinical trial outcomes for 21,926 in the injected group to the 5.5 billion of people injected globally over the 22 months of the injection roll-out whilst acknowledging the very low statistical relevance of doing so (same applies to the low statistical relevance of the clinical trial numbers in general!) we need to multiply the clinical trial data for cases, deaths and adverse events by around 250,000. There is an obvious temporal issue between 6 months of clinical trial data and 22 months of adverse event data post-authorization of injections. The same temporal issue applies to the 4.9 million C19 deaths and additional 550 million C19 cases since the roll-out date of the injections on 10 December 2020."
I think even you can see the potential hypocrisy in thw above and the doubl standard he is applying?
As for
"
You think non peer reviewed"
They two certainly were as have been a lot of other studies. The Italian study was given to their parliament as the germans did theirs.
Dr. Arne Burkhardt is one of the most experienced pathologists in Europe but no doubt you'll call him names because you feel what he is saying is incorrect. Mind you, I have no doubt you have not watched his report
https://odysee.com/@halloftruth:c/c...eclared-components-of-the-covid-19-vaccines:c
Italian peer reviewed study
https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/47/95
As for
"
Okay... now you are just entering "take your meds" territory. Your friend sent you his blood? Whut?"
Actually take the time to read both my posts AND the Italian published study. Than put your money where your mouth is and go get your blood analysis done. Live blood analysis using dark field microscopy, if a miner can check this so can you.
Imagine doing it and proving me wrong, I have no gain, no money made BUT you can gloat and prove me wrong. Off you go and turn your belief/hypothesis into fact
