There was a paper published at the end of december measuring myocarditis risk by examining NHS data of 42M people who had been vaccinated. They got criticized for not stratifying risk of myocarditis by age and sex, and pushing a blanket vaccination narrative. They published
a revision with stratified risk.
The risk of myocarditis for a male under 40 was 101 per million following a second dose of Moderna, as compared to 7 per million following infection. Then if you look at
page 9, the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of myocarditis for dose 2 was double the risk of dose 1, and dose 3 was double the risk of dose 2.
Quote from the conclusion:
Despite more myocarditis events occurring in older persons, the risk following COVID-19 vaccination was largely restricted to younger males aged less than 40 years, where the risks of myocarditis following vaccination and infection were similar. However, the notable exception was that in younger males receiving a second dose of mRNA-1273 vaccine, the risk of myocarditis was higher following vaccination than infection, with an additional 101 events estimated following a second dose of mRNA-1273 vaccine compared to 7 events following a positive SARS-CoV-2 test
Look at the credentials of the people publishing the study: high-ranking experts in multiple different UK and Scottish health agencies, funded by the UK government and University of Oxford. Gotta love the media and brainless NPCs saying this is fake news or disinformation. They won't be able to keep up this bullshit narrative for very long.