- Joined
- Jul 4, 2009
- Messages
- 70,213
- Reaction score
- 43,265
So only four out of hundreds of mass shootings. Just like I said.There have been 4 in the last 6 months, plus the gay boyfriend of a tranny murdering Charlie Kirk in public on behalf of the tranny death cult, then the one just a couple years ago shooting up kids in Nashville for being white christians, and the feds hid the trannyfesto from the public and pretended the motive was just mystery. There was another who shot up a rite aid in Maryland, another one at a bar in Colorado, then another one who shot up a school in Colorado, and they weren't "treating" autism and depression by sterilizing kids and mutilating their genitals before that.
It's just rich how different the numbers look depending on who the white libs are trying to run cover for. Trying to cover for the insane amount of black violence? Well the number of mass shooting is like 140 in the last 40 years so they can claim "well ackshually most mass shooters are white" because that gets it to 55%. Then when it's time to cover for trannies, well hurry up and throw all the black gang shootings back in so we can increase the denominator by orders of magnitude.
Libs need to pick which of their pet groups are more important to them, is it black gang members or is it the trannies? You either post the higher number of "mass shootings" and black people commit like 75% of them, or you take those out to make your "most are white guys" claim, but then you have the 0.6% of trannies commiting mass shootings at like 40x their share of the popuation.
