I agree with some of this analysis, it's definitely very strong and accurate information, but what I feel might be missing is a real analysis of Gamrot's propensity to scramble his way out of trouble - because his pace is so intense, he's often able to gloss over losing positions and lacking real top control. I'm really not sure he'll be able to win back those positions against Beneil...
My concern is that he's shown he will struggle to dominate at this level - against Guram, and against Arman - two perfectly legitimate, high level opponents, no doubt, but his style leaves a lot to chance IMO - he gives opponents opportunities, and yes, that's what makes him so fun, and that's what makes his incredible record even more impressive - because he's not watertight, but he wins.
I actually think Gamrot is going to have to lean on being the less predictable striker - but in terms of all the basics, on the feet and the mat, Beneil is so damn solid that I think this could be an unusually difficult fight for Mateusz.
Does that make sense?
They're pretty similar in terms of metrics, the main difference is the sheer volume, pace and activity of Gamrot - I'm just not sure how it serves him particularly well against Dariush.
Either way, I expect it to be DAMN close!