• Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version.

Fury by KO

Chaotic Progressor

Orange Belt
@Orange
Joined
Jan 11, 2024
Messages
450
Reaction score
686
Fury's gonna come back and do the business boys.

First fight was closer than people remember - everybody ofc thinking about Fury nearly being KO'd and how hurt he was, but that's ONE round. You don't win a fight from one round.

Honestly I think Usyk is a bit overrated. Yes he's good, but he's just a BIT better than everybody, he's not a dominant champion by any means. He hardly destroyed Joshua did he? Or Dubois. Dubois was giving him a tough fight, Derek Chisora gave him a tough fight ffs - and anyone who believes his nonsense that he 'kind of lost on purpose' to make Joshua fancy him is a fkn retard, seriously, lmao - that's just Usyk giving a line to explain away a journeyman going 12 rounds with him. No fighter is gonna risk 'losing on purpose a bit'. Idiocy.

Usyk wins close decision fights. Even the Joshua 2 fight; I can't stand AJ, so have every reason to see it through biased eyes - I thought Joshua won it.

The Fury fight...

Rounds 4, 5, 6 & 7 were Fury rounds, easily, and looked like he was going to maybe stop Usyk / Usyk looked tired and like he was giving up, first time I've ever seen him like it.

Rounds 1 & 2 were Usyk, just, 3 is debatable; 8, 9 & 10 all Usyk obviously, with a 10-8 in round 9, 11 & 12 both debatable, but most agree - 11 Usyk, 12 Fury.

That's a close fight.

Fury also had him hurt a couple times, was landing the uppercut at will, and didn't jump on him, too much respect - almost as if he wanted to win by points and be like 'I outboxed the boxer, see, I'm better'... I think this time, if he has him hurt, he will jump on him - and I think this whole 'I won't do anything differently' thing is mind games, so Usyk expects the same.

I bet he's been training hard looking for a knockout.

I was right when he did this for Wilder 2, and nobody believed him. But it was obvious to me he wasn't BS'ing bc he changed trainer to a knockout artist trainer in Sugar Hill AND put on a bunch of weight. People thinking him being heavier or any HW being heavier all the time = didn't train... sometimes it's intentional, to put more weight behind his punches, and, what he did to Wilder, which was lean on him n shit. I just knew from his actions - he ain't BSing if he's changing trainer n shit,

Unfortunately I didn't have the money to put on it, but I also was going to bet round 7, I put up a FB post before the fight 'Fury KO by 7', I woulda won like 10k :(

This time I got SOME money, not as much as I'd like, but, hey ho, tis what tis.

As always, my money where my mouth is lads:

1734189506875.png

People talking about Usyk like he's the Matrix or invincible. Dude has been nearly beat and hurt on many ocassions. He just has a bit better gas tank and is a bit slicker than most.

May the gods be with me and bring me a very merry Christma$$$$$.

C'Mon Fury son! Get'in there ma boy.
 
Last edited:
Didn't you pick Mike to beat Jake Paul last time? I know you got it right another time with Joshua vs Dubois but still.

I did.

And I was still surprised by what happened.

And I'm not on the 'Paul's fights are rigged' train but, and I know Mike is 58, but something did look really odd, watching it back. Like, Mike jabbed him and had a clear opening, then just didn't punch. He's never held back in his life, he never does, against anybody... so I really doubt Jake Paul struck fear into his heart, so, I don't get that. Honestly think that Jake Paul 'if you go more than 5 rounds I'll double your purse' or w.e it was - could have been a motivator. That is like open fight fixing. It's basically saying to Tyson - don't try knock me out rounds 1/2 or I'll pay you half.
 
you only have to be a little bit better than everyone to be the very best in the world

he hasn't nearly been beaten ever, some of his fights have been close, but he has been the clear winner in all of them

its like saying an F1 driver can drive a little bit faster than everyone else, yeah, that makes him the fucking best that does, thats how it works
 
you only have to be a little bit better than everyone to be the very best in the world

he hasn't nearly been beaten ever, some of his fights have been close, but he has been the clear winner in all of them

its like saying an F1 driver can drive a little bit faster than everyone else, yeah, that makes him the fucking best that does, thats how it works

He has almost been beaten.

Dubois was not a low blow, Usyk stunk the place out with ham, shoulda been a TKO win for Dubois.

And Joshua 2, IMO AJ won. But even if you don't agree - he was not the 'clear' winner of that, and the split-decision win says so too.

Barely winning by a round or 2 is not a 'clear' winner, that's almost being beat.
 
He has almost been beaten.

Dubois was not a low blow, Usyk stunk the place out with ham, shoulda been a TKO win for Dubois.

And Joshua 2, IMO AJ won. But even if you don't agree - he was not the 'clear' winner of that, and the split-decision win says so too.

Barely winning by a round or 2 is not a 'clear' winner, that's almost being beat.
winning by 2 rounds is a clear winner and there is no way in hell he lost that second Joshua fight, just because one judge is as bad at scoring as you, don't bring that into your narrative

and the Dubious thing.....LOL, mate, you really dont like the guy do you, i'm pretty sure if that had of been called a knockdown he would have gotten up, and if it had been called a knockdown, it would have been the wrong call

your like an anti fanboy, its odd
 
  • Like
Reactions: MT7
winning by 2 rounds is a clear winner and there is no way in hell he lost that second Joshua fight, just because one judge is as bad at scoring as you, don't bring that into your narrative

and the Dubious thing.....LOL, mate, you really dont like the guy do you, i'm pretty sure if that had of been called a knockdown he would have gotten up, and if it had been called a knockdown, it would have been the wrong call

your like an anti fanboy, its odd

I'm not an anti fanboy, I like the guy.

1 or 2 clearly is a clear winner in a sense, but what I mean is... it's not domination or even close to it. So the idea 'nobody can beat him' when it's that close... is stupid.

I just think he's overrated, bc all time greats beat everybody or most guys easily. He hasn't beaten the best easily at all. It's been close.

And Fury will come back and beat him. We'll find out soon enough anyway.

And no I rewatched the Usyk v Joshua fight - now Joshua I genuinely do dislike, so like I say, I have every reason in the world to see it biased in favour of Usyk. I watched closely. Joshua did the most damage, more often. He had Usyk in trouble a lot. Depends what you score, whether you like more movement, or more damage - doesn't mean I'm bad at scoring mate, no need to be a dick - we just disagree.

Maybe @ the Dubois thing. But he woulda been in serious trouble, bc he obviously used that time to recover and was badly hurt. Unless Usyk's balls are in his belly button, that was a gut punch. So yes, I don't like him for this - but in general I like the guy - but for this - that was snakey, how much he ham'd it.

1734198249495.png
 
I'm not an anti fanboy, I like the guy.

1 or 2 clearly is a clear winner in a sense, but what I mean is... it's not domination or even close to it. So the idea 'nobody can beat him' when it's that close... is stupid.

I just think he's overrated, bc all time greats beat everybody or most guys easily. He hasn't beaten the best easily at all. It's been close.

And Fury will come back and beat him. We'll find out soon enough anyway.

And no I rewatched the Usyk v Joshua fight - now Joshua I genuinely do dislike, so like I say, I have every reason in the world to see it biased in favour of Usyk. I watched closely. Joshua did the most damage, more often. He had Usyk in trouble a lot. Depends what you score, whether you like more movement, or more damage - doesn't mean I'm bad at scoring mate, no need to be a dick - we just disagree.

Maybe @ the Dubois thing. But he woulda been in serious trouble, bc he obviously used that time to recover and was badly hurt. Unless Usyk's balls are in his belly button, that was a gut punch. So yes, I don't like him for this - but in general I like the guy - but for this - that was snakey, how much he ham'd it.

View attachment 1075861
There was no low blow.
I agree
 
i don't think i have ever seen anyone ever say he is unbeatable, that is something that has manifested in your head

also, it isnt called a "ball punch", it a low blow, which a shot below the beltline, which that clearly was
 
i don't think i have ever seen anyone ever say he is unbeatable, that is something that has manifested in your head

also, it isnt called a "ball punch", it a low blow, which a shot below the beltline, which that clearly was

Yeah but he acted like it was in his balls. And it was on the belt. The belt which was on his nipples.

Hard not to hit him below the belt when body shotting, when he wears his frickin shorts up to his neck.

1734201177558.png

Dude had a 5 minute timeout from being punched in the stomach. A legitimate target.

He def wears them high for this reason, so he can complain about body shots, did it against Joshua too. Refs/officials should be pulling his shorts down HAHA, pause.

-

Also plenty have said he's unbeatable. I hear it all the time, it's not in my head, I listen to boxing pundits and discussions and constantly it's 'I don't think anyone can beat Usyk', as if he's fkn Mike Tyson in 1988 just blowing everyone out the water. How could you say nobody could beat him when it's so close.

Anyway see you back here when Fury does him.
 
Yeah but he acted like it was in his balls. And it was on the belt. The belt which was on his nipples.

Hard not to hit him below the belt when body shotting, when he wears his frickin shorts up to his neck.

View attachment 1075863

Dude had a 5 minute timeout from being punched in the stomach. A legitimate target.

He def wears them high for this reason, so he can complain about body shots, did it against Joshua too. Refs/officials should be pulling his shorts down HAHA, pause.

-

Also plenty have said he's unbeatable. I hear it all the time, it's not in my head, I listen to boxing pundits and discussions and constantly it's 'I don't think anyone can beat Usyk', as if he's fkn Mike Tyson in 1988 just blowing everyone out the water. How could you say nobody could beat him when it's so close.

Anyway see you back here when Fury does him.
i dont know how much boxing you watch, but nearly every one of them wears shorts high, otherwise the protector would be showing, as indicated in the picture you have just posted, is his shorts were any lower his whole protector would be showing, which is probably illegal(not something i have ever looked into)

i'd like you to show me some examples of people saying Usyk is unbeatable, i have never ever heard that before until this thread, i'm not saying it hasn't been said, but it could just be fucking idiots

i don't actually care who wins this fight, i just think it is unlikely Fury wins it, be i have been wrong many many times before(but not in this thread :P )
 
Just a series of really biased opinions, TS. Hard to see how anyone with boxing knowledge would think Joshua won that second fight, and the idea that Fury only wanted to win on points is just dumb. Oh, and sure, the two weight division undisputed champion who has never lost is overrated. Yes, and Fury is a giant man who knows how to fight so of course it's possible he'll win the rematch but I doubt it.
 
i dont know how much boxing you watch, but nearly every one of them wears shorts high, otherwise the protector would be showing, as indicated in the picture you have just posted, is his shorts were any lower his whole protector would be showing, which is probably illegal(not something i have ever looked into)

i'd like you to show me some examples of people saying Usyk is unbeatable, i have never ever heard that before until this thread, i'm not saying it hasn't been said, but it could just be fucking idiots

i don't actually care who wins this fight, i just think it is unlikely Fury wins it, be i have been wrong many many times before(but not in this thread :p )

I watch a lot. Have been watching it half my life. I also rewatch fights, analyse boxing and fighters, and fights... constantly. Bc I love it.

You've got a real condescending attitude, presuming I or others don't know or watch boxing, just bc you're disagreed with. You should shake that, it's immature and weak.

I never seen shorts as high as Usyks. The fact multiple people commented on it tells you it's unusual too. Most fighters have their shorts on or just below their belly button. Usyk notches it up like 2-3 inches more, obviously so he can complain about 'low blows', bc dude does not like body shots.
 
Just a series of really biased opinions, TS. Hard to see how anyone with boxing knowledge would think Joshua won that second fight, and the idea that Fury only wanted to win on points is just dumb. Oh, and sure, the two weight division undisputed champion who has never lost is overrated. Yes, and Fury is a giant man who knows how to fight so of course it's possible he'll win the rematch but I doubt it.

Well, I do have boxing knowledge, and it's not biased when I pointed out already - I dislike Joshua. I don't dislike Usyk. So, why would I be biased in favor of Joshua? That makes 0 sense.

I think a lot of people saw the fight how they saw it, and that Usyk won, and presumption afterwards that he clearly won - I encourage you to go back and rewatch it.
 
i mean, this is just from a very quick search, all just as high if not higher than Usyk, get over yourself, you have made a really poor observation a few times in this thread and cant back it up with anything substantial, that isnt me being condescending, its you being blind
1734203932171.png1734203966479.png1734204218841.png
 
honestly, usyk rolling around is the one thing that makes me really doubt him, that might be a bit of a wimp streak showing. If he only did it one time, no problem but it's a pattern and what's gonna happen when the going gets tough for real?

Anyway, no way he loses this fight, Fury is a basketcase and that's not a fighter to bet on. Incidentally, did anyone ever confirm whether that was him squirming around on the cement at some bar?
 
honestly, usyk rolling around is the one thing that makes me really doubt him, that might be a bit of a wimp streak showing. If he only did it one time, no problem but it's a pattern and what's gonna happen when the going gets tough for real?

Anyway, no way he loses this fight, Fury is a basketcase and that's not a fighter to bet on. Incidentally, did anyone ever confirm whether that was him squirming around on the cement at some bar?
Alot of the people that defend him, wouldve never defended Canelo or Fury had they done the same thing.
 
Back
Top