Social Florida Republican Rep. Says Gov. DeSantis Is Right To Ban Critical Race Theory From Schools

He's not wrong. Imagine teaching kids some poorly slapped together op-ed with no basis in reality. We already waste enough precious time in public education, no need for more story time.

<36>
 
Sherdoggers constantly give evidence for the validity of Critical Race Theory.

Making this thread because a Republican agrees with a Republican governor seemed strange to me at first....I looked at the title and was like "no shit, why is this even thread worthy" then I opened the thread and saw the Athletic & Explosive Representative and it made sense.
Yeah but he’s a black republican. That gives society hope. It shows that all black people haven’t been brainwashed by the left. Free thinkers still exist & that’s a good thing
 
In 2021 you seriously think this is not an important issue? Were you asleep throughout 2020 when wokeness got mainstreamed?

FFS.
It’s outrage porn for the low IQ.
 
Leaving aside the idea that it's the exclusive cause*, if you ask me, that's not so much of a theory as an observation of reality**. But I asked him specifically because I want to know if he knows what he is complaining about. At least 75% of the time you see these kinds of threads here, they're based upon false premises and/or deliberate misstatement of the issue. So, I'd like for the people supporting the OP to explain exactly what they think Critical Race Theory is and detail why it's bad. Then, when I will go and learn about it in some detail and I won't be surprised at all if what they said is a bunch of nonsense; it certainly won't be the first time. Mean time, there's no sense arguing with them because they're likely not even discussing reality but instead a belief they have derived from their confirmation biases. To put that another way, once they've been told what to think it's hard to get them to see reality. FWIW I think @Sickness1 is the likeliest exception to that rule ITT so I particularly want his perspective on the actual issue at hand.

It's like the argument that BLM were violent during the protests last year. The complaint that certain people at the protests started shit as soon as it got dark is valid, but it's not valid to conflate that with the entire movement or the far more fundamental issue of racism in policing--rather the purpose is to deflect and get people arguing about something other than that. Ditto the argument that it's bad for the entire LGBTQ community to conflate the sexual preferences of gay people with the gender identity issues facing trans people. Yes, that's dumb and damaging to the discourse, but it is commonly used to disparage trans people and deflect from the main issue of how best to respect the humanity and dignity of the trans community and impede the progress of destigmatizing them because this lot can never get enough of scapegoating whatever group they can attach a label to.

You see this tactic over and over in the WR. You rarely get an honest answer when you confront them with that question directly, however.


*since you can't prove the negative statement that there are no other causes and no one else can either
**for example, consider the data showing higher rates of stops and arrests and harsher sentencing for the same offenses among whites and visible minorities, not to mention red lining and gerrymandering, cutting health services in poor and primarily black communities, lack of access to a public defender for more than 5 minutes at a time, segregation along class lines, and on and on
You do make great points Andy. I totally get what you are saying too, I didn't really look it that way. Sometimes my partaisn gets the best of me at times. Do you think they should do a trail period for critical race theory first to see if goes well in the school's? What does ITT mean too ?
 
It’s outrage porn for the low IQ.
My older friend in Portland got blindsided by his local government promoted intersectionality (young POC, LGBTQ, gender, socioeconomic status) first over the elderly and immunocompromised for the vaccine rollout.....now he takes this stuff seriously.

That type of politicizing of the vaccine is a result of ideas from CRT.
 
You do make great points Andy. I totally get what you are saying too, I didn't really look it that way. Sometimes my partaisn gets the best of me at times. Do you think they should do a trail period for critical race theory first to see if goes well in the school's? What does ITT mean too ?
I would like you to tell me what critical race theory is to you before I comment on the subject--it's not a term with which I am familiar.
 
I would like you to tell me what critical race theory is to you before I comment on the subject--it's not a term with which I am familiar.
critical race theory is
Closely connected to such fields as philosophy, history, sociology, and law, CRT scholarship traces racism in America through the nation’s legacy of slavery the Civil Rights Movement and recent events.
 
critical race theory is
Closely connected to such fields as philosophy, history, sociology, and law, CRT scholarship traces racism in America through the nation’s legacy of slavery the Civil Rights Movement and recent events.
Saying it's closely connected to something else is not saying what the thing itself is. Would you try again for me? I mean, I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt because you seem like a good guy to me no matter your political views, but from my point of view you're saying why do we need this when you don't have a clear understanding of what it is you appear to be dismissing as unneeded. That is, when you say, "Why do we need critical race theory", I assume you mean it's unneeded and are asking to be convinced of the contrary.

But do you actually mean that like me, you don't really know what it is and want to know what its purpose is?

I'm getting the idea that it's just an attempt to look at the fundamental basis for systemic racism through a formal and rigorous academic lens. So, I'd really like to know what the people ITT think it means instead and why it's racist. Don't you?
 
Saying it's closely connected to something else is not saying what the thing itself is. Would you try again for me? I mean, I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt because you seem like a good guy to me no matter your political views, but from my point of view you're saying why do we need this when you don't have a clear understanding of what it is you appear to be dismissing as unneeded. That is, when you say, "Why do we need critical race theory", I assume you mean it's unneeded and are asking to be convinced of the contrary.

But do you actually mean that like me, you don't really know what it is and want to know what its purpose is?

I'm getting the idea that it's just an attempt to look at the fundamental basis for systemic racism through a formal and rigorous academic lens. So, I'd really like to know what the people ITT think it means instead and why it's racist. Don't you?
Again I understand what you are saying. Yes I do need to look up more about critical race theory before judging it. Sorry for my stupidity at time's. A lot of us here are quickly to judge thing's without being knowable to speak about it. Sorry again for looking like a dummy Andy. I will do more research later on tonight about this topic.
 
critical race theory is
Closely connected to such fields as philosophy, history, sociology, and law, CRT scholarship traces racism in America through the nation’s legacy of slavery the Civil Rights Movement and recent events.


Critical race theory is a neo-Orwellian attempt to radically alter the definition of racism.

Rather than employing the conventional definition of racism, " believing one is one is superior/inferior based on certain racial/biological characteristics..."

CRT is upping their game in terms of branding who is and isn't racist.
what we see in CRT is this:

"The institutions in America were built on racism,...and to benefit white folk, and only white folk. (they are slowly expanding this to Asians too). if you benefit from this system, then you are racist. and since only white people benefit from this system, only white people can be racist. "

this is CRT in a nutshell. it is categorically condemning an entire race to being "racist" because they purportedly benefit from a "racism system" with out factoring in any other variables such as their socio-econonic status, their family upbringing etc.

And Robin D'Angelo and Ibram Kendi have piggy backed and doubled down off this.
 
Critical race theory encourages racial prejudice and bigotry. It should be opposed by anyone who wants a harmonious, pluralistic society.
So, I invite you to please explain to me what critical race theory is and in what way it encourages racial prejudice and bigotry. Please be as specific as possible.
Quoted for absolute truth.
I enjoin you likewise.

Please note, I'm asking two separate questions but they're both required to make sense of your comments so if you want anyone to take either of your comments at all seriously I'd appreciate if you'd do the courtesy of addressing them both.
 
Critical race theory is a neo-Orwellian attempt to radically alter the definition of racism.

Rather than employing the conventional definition of racism, " believing one is one is superior/inferior based on certain racial/biological characteristics..."

CRT is upping their game in terms of branding who is and isn't racist.
what we see in CRT is this:

"The institutions in America were built on racism,...and to benefit white folk, and only white folk. (they are slowly expanding this to Asians too). if you benefit from this system, then you are racist. and since only white people benefit from this system, only white people can be racist. "

this is CRT in a nutshell. it is categorically condemning an entire race to being "racist" because they purportedly benefit from a "racism system" with out factoring in any other variables such as their socio-econonic status, their family upbringing etc.

And Robin D'Angelo and Ibram Kendi have piggy backed and doubled down off this.
Two things, if that's what they are trying to do well, that's some real bullshit going on. I hate Getting called racist for shit that happened before I was born, it is plain wrong and should be called out. Again, I do need to my own research on this too.
 
Two things, if that's what they are trying to do well, that's some real bullshit going on. I hate Getting called racist for shit that happened before I was born, it is plain wrong and should be called out. Again, I do need to my own research on this too.

I suggest you read

"How to be Anti-Racist"

"White Fragility"

to start out with...these are the two most popular works in WLC's lexicon.

to defeat your enemy, (WLCs) you must know how they think and believe. you must be able to speak their language.
 
Two things, if that's what they are trying to do well, that's some real bullshit going on. I hate Getting called racist for shit that happened before I was born, it is plain wrong and should be called out. Again, I do need to my own research on this too.

exactly right....

you should not be held accountable for things you didn't commit, actions that you had no hand in.

this is what the Germans called "Sippenhaft", collective punishment...or "sins of the father."

I don't know you...have no idea what your upbringing was like...I sure as hell aren't going to assume your life was easier than mine simply because you're white.
 
I suggest you read

"How to be Anti-Racist"

"White Fragility"

to start out with...these are the two most popular works in WLC's lexicon.

to defeat your enemy, (WLCs) you must know how they think and believe. you must be able to speak their language.
I've read white fragility, I think a year ago and it was just a bunch of bullshit that you hear from people saying you should feel bad about how white's treated them. Dude I'm sorry they treated you're people year's ago but I'm not them at all.
 
exactly right....

you should not be held accountable for things you didn't commit, actions that you had no hand in.

this is what the Germans called "Sippenhaft", collective punishment...or "sins of the father."

I don't know you...have no idea what your upbringing was like...I sure as hell aren't going to assume your life was easier than mine simply because you're white.
We only have this one life and I'm not here to hate anybody because how they are. I might understand why they are that why but I don't that person. Only when they kill,rape, or pedophiles then I am going to hate person.
 
I've read white fragility, I think a year ago and it was just a bunch of bullshit that you hear from people saying you should feel bad about how white's treated them. Dude I'm sorry they treated you're people year's ago but I'm not them at all.

The most preposterous thing about this book is just how racist (against Black folk) it is.
Robin D'angelo writes as if she knows how all black people think.

I came across this Youtube comment that said it best.

"LOL, this woman thinks she's the Dr. Dolittle of black people."
 
We only have this one life and I'm not here to hate anybody because how they are. I might understand why they are that why but I don't that person. Only when they kill,rape, or pedophiles then I am going to hate person.

I'm the same way...I give everyone the benefit of the doubt. however....when you start to malign me or my family simply because of the way we look...then we have a problem.
 
The most preposterous thing about this book is just how racist (against Black folk) it is.
Robin D'angelo writes as if she knows how all black people think.

I came across this Youtube comment that said it best.

"LOL, this woman thinks she's the Dr. Dolittle of black people."
she's a good bullshitter which people believe. She's was probably laughing well she wrote the book.

I'm the same way...I give everyone the benefit of the doubt. however....when you start to malign me or my family simply because of the way we look...then we have a problem.
well I told you what I did with my brother's best friend, saying shit about my mom.
 
Back
Top