• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Elections First Presidential Debate Discussion: 9/26/16

Who won the debate?


  • Total voters
    495
  • Poll closed .
Drudge Report

Who won the debate?

As of 4:42 pm

Trump - 82.26% (837,519 votes)

Clinton - 17.74% (180,666)
 
Never seen her say that she'd shoot down Russian planes.

Trump thinks it's ok to let everyone have nukes. Trump thinks we should use nukes. He wants to "carpet bomb ISIS". He wants to deport/kill the families of terrorists. He wants to bring back torture and use worse kinds of torture than waterboarding.

Does that worry you?

This should worry everyone, provided it's true what you claim here.

But what worries me even more, way more - is a nuclear conflict with Russia.
 
"All the online polls said I won. They said I WON, you see. I think people that saw the debate and were on cyber it's a landslide and, because let me tell you I want to make America great again. I've been all over and met some great people and cyber is good to me because I understand."
 
Collection of surveys of undecided voters and comments from conservative pundits admitting Hillary won-


The Daily 202: Why even Republicans think Clinton won the first debate

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...on-the-first-debate/57e9b033e9b69b3019a1e037/


“After the first 20 minutes, it may have been the most lopsided debate I’ve ever seen — and not because Clinton was particularly effective. But you don’t need to be good when your opponent is bad,” writes National Review’s David French
 
I don't understand how anyone who is of sound rational mind could thing Trump "won". All he did was yell over Hillary. I guess that's how you "win" a debate when you are an angry white guy with no real points to make.
 
I depise Killary, but she didn't look buffoonish on stage. She lied and pandered and wasn't asked hard questions, but Trump looked like an idiot up there
 
Hilary definitely won

but trump vows to hit harder and put the pressure on hilarry, which seems like he is listening to what i said and actually have a changes to win the second debate.
 
I depise Killary, but she didn't look buffoonish on stage. She lied and pandered and wasn't asked hard questions, but Trump looked like an idiot up there

What did she say that wasn't true? Or is "she lied" just nutter speak for "I don't like her"?
 
He never said that
So let me explain the logic on that, and then you'll see why it doesn't matter that he said "global warming" instead.

For it to be a true premise that Trump somehow believes in Climate Change but thinks Global Warming is a Chinese hoax (and this premise must be true if there is any point to noting the difference in what he said), then it would (practically-speaking) have to be true that Climate Change does not incorporate Global Warming as required by the greater model. That is false.

It would be similar to saying that a person thinks mitochondria is a Chinese hoax, but that they still believe in cellular respiration. Or if you don't like that analogy, pick anything where some concept or state is a critical part of a greater model, and somehow just that critical part is a Chinese hoax. It's not credible.

At the very least, our understanding of the greater system would have to be caused by a Chinese hoax, according to the world view of Trump.
 
Yep, and David French is a known Trump hater.

Your point though was the Washington post was liberal. The article is quoting different conservative pundits/ journalists. That what I was trying to show you
 
Back
Top