• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

First excerpts of Memo - on Fox now

Seriously, at this point, Obama and Hillary could caught live on air broadcast around the world, eating live babies, chewing with their mouths open, and the war room left would be like " Theeeeeyyyyy wuuuuuzzzzz huug-greeeee!!!"
Embarrassing, even by Deplorabot standards.
 
I know. Who would even want to talk about that Nunes memo thing? No one wants to read an "inconvenient truth."
What “truth”? The FISA warrant is 400 pages long. The Republicans released a memo dealing with a fraction of it, and the FBI says releasing information on just this section is extremely misleading.

Please tell me what “truth” we are supposed to glean from that mess.
 
What “truth”? The FISA warrant is 400 pages long. The Republicans released a memo dealing with a fraction of it, and the FBI says releasing information on just this section is extremely misleading.

Please tell me what “truth” we are supposed to glean from that mess.
Trump did that shit, homie.
 
Embarrassing, even by Deplorabot standards.

Every time he posts, I am thankful that he mostly just sticks to liking. It's legitimately frightening that people that self-unaware and allergic to reality exist.
 
What “truth”? The FISA warrant is 400 pages long. The Republicans released a memo dealing with a fraction of it, and the FBI says releasing information on just this section is extremely misleading.

Please tell me what “truth” we are supposed to glean from that mess.

Please refer to the items outlined in the original post.
 
Rod Rosenstein 3 weeks ago threatened Chairman Nunes and Others






Sounds like the kind of shit that gets someone fired...
 
Every time he posts, I am thankful that he mostly just sticks to liking. It's legitimately frightening that people that self-unaware and allergic to reality exist.
This comiseration was brought to you by .... Contra!
 
All of my comments here are based through the lens of politics.

I don’t need to explain what’s in the warrant applications, the fbi does. If they can’t, looks like the lose.

Well they already did, to a bi-partisan federal court, who approved the warrant. The Nune's memo attempts to paint a picture that the warrant was illegally obtained. And that's the question.

Given that the warrant was based on a metric fuckton of info that didn't involve the steele dossier, the onus is on the memo supporters to explain why that warrant was obtained through illegal means. It, in all it's glorious 4 pages (out of 400 from the actual application) fails to do so.

I'm asking whether or not your understand the memo's accusations, and why legally, they don't meet the warrant requirement. You've ignored this, and pointed only to some MSNBC anchor declaring Trump "winning" as some sort of justification.

It's clear to everyone that you're just latching on to media talking points that you believe support your position, without even understanding what your actual position is.

Essentially, you're acting like a partisan cuck, but everyone knew that already.
 
Well they already did, to a bi-partisan federal court, who approved the warrant. The Nune's memo attempts to paint a picture that the warrant was illegally obtained. And that's the question.

Given that the warrant was based on a metric fuckton of info that didn't involve the steele dossier, the onus is on the memo supporters to explain why that warrant was obtained through illegal means. It, in all it's glorious 4 pages (out of 400 from the actual application) fails to do so.

I'm asking whether or not your understand the memo's accusations, and why legally, they don't meet the warrant requirement. You've ignored this, and pointed only to some MSNBC anchor declaring Trump "winning" as some sort of justification.

It's clear to everyone that you're just latching on to media talking points that you believe support your position, without even understanding what your actual position is.

Essentially, you're acting like a partisan cuck, but everyone knew that already.




Of course I’m acting like a partisan, this is shertdog.


What part of Steele testifying that it wouldn’t have been granted without the dossier don’t you get?
 
He's arguing with you like a chick would.... overall protecting the wrong side so they will find other things to argue about and bring up different things in history

Then I throw the same really easy question to you dipshit:

How, in particularity, did this violate the legal requirement for obtaining a lawful warrant?

And yeah, have the balls to tag me if you're gonna talk shit. Don't hide from rebuttals. Cuck's do that.
 
Back
Top