You have no facts in your hand. Your last post was a random appeal to Gowdy, a man who has said little to support your position.
Fuck off,
You have no facts in your hand. Your last post was a random appeal to Gowdy, a man who has said little to support your position.
Well, I've got a date sunday, so fingers crossed!Fuck off,
Well, I've got a date sunday, so fingers crossed!
Still not a fact, though.
Is this even a serious question?
Let’s start with Bruce Ohr, who’s wife worked for fusion gps, using Steele as a source after contact was severed, relaying his “info” back to the fbi.
On the news yesterday? He stated he had read the underlying classified info.
Not sure about perjury, however this will not be just swept under the typical political rug. This is as big of a deal as we’ve ever seenYou may not care that the DoJ and the FBI abused their power and committed perjury using a dossier paid for by Hillary Clinton and created through Russian agents feeding propaganda, but most of America will. The judges that were lied to will as well.
This is only the tip of the iceberg.
So she claims.female date?
I'm starting to wonder if you actually read the memo. Any use of the Steele dossier as evidence to establish probable cause to obtain a warrant, was roughly .0000000001% of the evidence used. And was nothing that the FBI and federal agencies didn't already have. The warrant was obtained through other evidence. So says everyone who actually read the warrant application.
So explain it to me then dipshit, what the fuck does your above post have to do with whether or not the warrant was legally obtained?
Lol somebody is upset
Please. You weren't able to parse Gowdy's tweet, and don't know the difference between a warrant - which will say very little except for describe the thing to be searched - and the warrant application. Why would it help to allow you to evaluate a 400-page document chock full of sensitive information?You have no idea what the warrant says. I think we should all see them.
Please. You weren't able to parse Gowdy's tweet, and don't know the difference between a warrant - which will say very little except for describe the thing to be searched - and the warrant application. Why would it help to allow you to evaluate a 400-page document chock full of sensitive information?
So she claims.
Fingers crossed.
Not sure about perjury, however this will not be just swept under the typical political rug. This is as big of a deal as we’ve ever seen