- Joined
- Jan 20, 2007
- Messages
- 31,985
- Reaction score
- 11,774
Do you watch Rick and Morty?
NoDo you watch Rick and Morty?
True but I still feel more comfortable having a bipartisan appointee than someone hand selected by a single person they may have to investigate one day
"The Papadopoulos information triggered the opening of an FBI counterintelligence investigation in late July 2016 by FBI agent Pete Strzok," the memo noted in its final paragraph."Can you post the info showing he was used in the FISA application
A ‘source’ (aka FBI) informed The NY Times that a FISA warrant was issued against Page back in 2013. You can read that claim in The NY Times annotation of the letter.
Most likely the FBI has been tapping the guys phones for years, and recycling the findings against him in subsequent applications. Nothing to do with Trump.
But this is not easy for them to explain as a defense in public! ‘It wasn’t Trump because we have already been spying on him for years, without any charges!’ Awkward.
Nunes says page doesn't deserve fisa warrant
![]()
You are becoming unhinged as we watch , it's somewhat entertaining
Read what I asked"The Papadopoulos information triggered the opening of an FBI counterintelligence investigation in late July 2016 by FBI agent Pete Strzok," the memo noted in its final paragraph."
Rememer last week these same people were talking about secret societies out to get trump. What will it be next week?
LOL - Derp, little buddy. Derp.Read what I asked
You guys don't understand that an INVESTIGATION is not a FISA application
Thanks, SBJJ, esq, for your analysis.
The problem is that contempt is for failure to comply with an order of the court. (or actively disrupting proceedings etc, but lets not pretend that it fits there either). This is an application for a warrant, not a response to a court order.
But maybe you can prove me wrong. Why not dig up some cases where a cop or prosecutor was imprisoned for contempt of court because they didn't disclose something to a judge when applying for a warrant? Or some similar action, I'm not too picky.
So can I sum up?
The republicans on the intel committee have released a memo bitching about a FISA warrant saying it was based on a shady file from a shady source and this was not disclosed to the judge.
Republicans are accused of giving a factually incomplete and incorrect account of the application by the Dems and the FBI. The Dems however have been muzzled by the republicans from releasing their side of events.
99.7% of all FISA warrants are rubber stamped suggesting that abuse may be wide spread, but somehow that abuse may have occurred in this case, makes it worse than watergate.
None of this changes the fact that the Mueller investigation is warranted becuase hippopotamus.
I think you actually believe this nonsenseYou guys are losing so bad and have been reduced to lying, trolling, and shilling. Who cares what you think?