Rankings can help sift through hindsight and one could evaluate (to a certain extent) how many high ranked fighters are on the main card from then to now.to be truly objective, one has to wait 4 more years to see how the 2018 cards look in hindsight.
cause those 2014 cards look stacked in hindsight.
to be truly objective, one has to wait 4 more years to see how the 2018 cards look in hindsight.
cause those 2014 cards look stacked in hindsight.
Nah bro. Nah. You're an Amanda Nunes fan.aside from the Lawler vs. Hendriks card, the cards today look better... The Khabib vs. Al card was plagued with injury but overall a great card
Nah bro. Nah. You're an Amanda Nunes fan.
Bro....why you doing this to yourself ?Yeah...
No one gave a shit about TJ Dillashaw and his reign... The bantamweight division didn't spark up until Cody hit the scene... the undercard pales in comparison to the Amanda Nunes card. That card is about as good or worse than this Saturdays.
Bro....why you doing this to yourself ?
MMA....what has happened to you????
It's dying.I love you bro.
What's happening to UFC ?
Except that score is based purely on win/losing streaks, not the quality of opponents.The ‘Dwyer Score’ is a scoring system designed to give a numeric value to the momentum of fighters competing at any one UFC event. It's an objective numerical quantification of the quality of a card.
List of event Dwyer scores: https://thedwyerscore.com/10-2/
169: 24
220: 16
170: 8
221: 15
171: 23
222: 15
172: 19
223: 17
Except that score is based purely on win/losing streaks, not the quality of opponents.
I'm not questioning its objectivity, merely flaws in its methodology.Win streaks are objective. Quality of opposition isn't. The Dwyer score is an objective measure, it's not the be-all end-all.
Worried? No.OP, you're like my ex bro... worried about shit from 4 years ago.... who cares ???