Coleman vs Severn. Each featured two wrestlers, one much more athletic. The less athletic fighter tried a shot with absolutely no setup that got easily denied, The fighter that shot in never advanced back to a neutral position. When Severn shot in, Coleman saw it a mile away and ended up gaining top position where he ended the fight with a kesa gatame style head-in-arm choke. And of course Rumble pounded the crap out of Bader. In each case, Bader and Severn were the less athletic fighter that on paper might have had submission advantages or guile on their side. And in both cases, the winning fighter took the initial mistake and never relinquished control of the fight. Anyone agree, or is there a better comparison for Rumble/Bader?