Fighters with no tattoos?

Well all these cultures have organized crime with a very pronounced tatoo aspect embedded in it.
If you get certain tattoos in these countries (or any tattoos in Japan) it means you’re probably really in it and served time in prison. Thief In Law tattoos aren’t a joke in Russia, you put in your dues to get those, and the consequences of being a poser are bad.
 
It feels like every single fighter in the MMA has a tattoo. In fact, I don't know a single fighter that doesn't have a tattoo. The only one I can think of is Matt Hughes and Randy Couture but Randy does have Tattoos.

The first tatted up fighter I remember was Joe "Diesel" Riggs.
The Diaz bro’s. A lot of fighters don’t have tattoos.
 
95% of the early UFC fighters until 2010’ish when tattoos went mainstream.

Past fighters look so much better aesthetically than the trash we see today.
 
Tito?
Frank shamrock, Ken shamrock, lots of the Gracie's.

As far as modern , Jose Aldo, Petr Yan, Khabib....there's a lot lol

1200 × 800

006img_1267-jpg.786512


“Why don’t you ask Frank about the f*ggot ass tattoo on the small of his back." ©Nick Diaz
 
Last edited:
Tatoos are for people who pretend not caring what others think but actually do.
Not really. Most people get tatoos for the dumbest reasons or no reason at all. They certainly dont care what people think of them, Why would they get them where you wont be able to see them then?
 
groups of organized crime from basically every culture have tattoos that doesn't say anything about normal people from any of those cultures.

It doesn't, dude just saying WHY it's less common in those cultures.


Kron Gracie is another fighter without tats.
 
Diaz bros not having tattoos is still surprising to me
 
Back
Top