Yes, it’s the absolute best of an absolute fringe sport.
Not that tough to figure out.
Dana told me it's bigger than soccer though. UFC value has tripled since being bought too
Yes, it’s the absolute best of an absolute fringe sport.
Not that tough to figure out.
None of this is true. Join the dots.
Increasing fighter pay, aside from just being the right thing to do means:I merely asked for opinions. Will increasing fighter pay benefit MMA in terms of fight quality or frequency? not really expressing my stance here
And then the UFC would literally die if that would happen.
I mean guys that arent working another fulltime job to cover the bills.What is your definition of training full time?
I agree you would get better fighters, but you also will have a lot of fighters phoning it in also.
Its one of the reasons why a union wouldn't work, the fighters who deserve the higher pay clearly deserve it, while you have fighters who believe they do without putting in half the work.
So do you think NBA qwners pay more because they’re good guys? Do you nothing about CBAs?The average salary in the NBA is 9 million, the average salary in the highest paid league outside of the NBA is 100k, that's nearly a 100 times difference.
Why doesn't the NBA take advantage of their monopoly and cut salaries of all players like the UFC does?
In some ways it will. In some ways it wont. Either way,the pay will always increase for the top guys,and thus it will eventually go up for others. For those unhappy with their pay,there are other promotions who may be able to give them what they are asking for. For those who get cut,they may be able to make their mark somewhere else. UFC is not the only place to go to make money.I merely asked for opinions. Will increasing fighter pay benefit MMA in terms of fight quality or frequency? not really expressing my stance here
There is no point talking about this. They will never get rid of USADA,unless they choose a new,more stringent (on the surface) and more corrupt org thats willing to live deeper in their pockets. Either way,heads will roll in the transition.Honestly maybe getting rid of USADA
Couldn't some league just advertise or no have testing? Almost brag about it like Pride did? I feel like that is almost fair for all athletes and would be fun seeing some life come into vets.There is no point talking about this. They will never get rid of USADA,unless they choose a new,more stringent (on the surface) and more corrupt org thats willing to live deeper in their pockets. Either way,heads will roll in the transition.
MLB & NBA are the only sport I can think of that has healthcare when they're done. NFL covers only for five years then the players have to pay & Boxing doesn't have it. I doubt the UFC will ever have a proper healthcare system when fighters are done.
All fighters who fight in the UFC started at similar contracts. Jon Jones 6k/6k, Conor 8k/8k. The fighters who get paid good with starting contracts in the UFC are fighters who already established a name outside the org. And just like any other sport, not all individuals will ever reach the high income, that's the sad reality of it.
I think fighters should at least be able to have 3 sponsors that they can advertise during fight week & night, it is what is. Fighters are still able to have sponsors though & lots of fighters have sponsors who pay them well.
It still isn't true. Why aren't you moaning about Bellator pay? Or One pay? Or PFL pay? Or regional pay?Yea, Dana logic, UFC is bigger than soccer but we pay peanuts. UFC value has tripled since being bought from the Fertitta brothers too
STFU dude, JesusI merely asked for opinions. Will increasing fighter pay benefit MMA in terms of fight quality or frequency? not really expressing my stance here
Dana told me it's bigger than soccer though. UFC value has tripled since being bought too
Yea, Dana logic, UFC is bigger than soccer but we pay peanuts. UFC value has tripled since being bought from the Fertitta brothers too
I've stopped posting in this thread long time ago yet you decided to respond to one of my several days old first posts .. I even kind of forgot about it until you responded but thanks to you I will reconsider decision to stop talking on the subject furtherSTFU dude, Jesus
Your still posting, STFU already.I've stopped posting in this thread long time ago yet you decided to respond to one of my several days old first posts .. I even kind of forgot about it until you responded but thanks to you I will reconsider decision to stop talking on the subject further
BTW aren't you the same guy who said this on this thread "Why the need to degrade everyone who doesn't hold your opinions?" Strange coming from someone who is triggered by questions..
Let me start by applauding your obvious and clearly click-bait troll post job. Is it you, Dana???So there has been another thread recently where it was stated how fighters are getting even less pay than in previous year in terms of pay to revenue (or pay to profits). It has caused yet another outburst of criticism of how bad and stingy UFC is and caused more calls for them to address the issue.
But I haven't really seen opinions and arguments on what benefits it gives to the actual fight game. So what are they? How is this going to benefit the fight game and MMA in general if UFC raises the fighter pay? Surely as a person I would be happy for someone getting paid even more for doing a legal and fair work, but as for MMA fan, what would be the interest?
Will the quality of fights become better? Or fighters will become more cautious, afraid to lose, and losing the win bonus? Will the fights become more frequent, especially between elites and championship ones become more frequent? Looking at boxing, it might not be the case .. People are criticizing lack of motion and championship fights in certain divisions already, as is ..
Will it draw better talent to the MMA? How can we be sure? A lot of fans have an opinion that stars of the past were better than the current ones when the pay wasn't anywhere close to the current numbers..
An argument I saw was that Bellator pays around 50% of revenue to fighters .. So what? They still pay less in actual numbers .. This ratio is only a testament that they are inferior as a promotion and as a business to the UFC. How should that press UFC to pay more, if they are paying more than anyone else already (in general)?
Isn't that the lack of demand in general that is problem and had it not been the case, the other promotions would have been able to pay more, and in turn force the UFC to pay more? But right now it is the UFC that is the main driver in the industry and generates new viewers so they might deserve what they are earning (I don't know anyone who first starting watching Bellator, One, PFL, before starting to watch UFC).
Anyways, what could be the objective benefits for us, MMA fans, if UFC raises fighter pay? So far from what I've seen the motive is "because screw Dana and his snow covered driveway" ..
I merely asked for opinions. Will increasing fighter pay benefit MMA in terms of fight quality or frequency? not really expressing my stance here