Fighter and fans Celebrating a Win, even after a s*** performance, or after a getting beat up

16%2B-%2B1
 
Close wins by the underdog are worth celebrating.

But clearly beating Silva is always worth celebrating.
 
Fighters fighting just to win 3 rounds, or fighting not to lose; Or winning a crappy and controversial decision;
That's the scenario of MMA today; Fighters and fans discussing who won some round, who controlled more the actions when actually nothing happened;

That's just sad, and Anderson vs Bisping was a big example of that, a guy after getting his face dismantled, wins a controversial decision, and then fans and himself starts to celebrate, as he did something great;

Romero also should be ashamed of that Win over Jacare, after getting dominated in the later rounds;

Fighters asking for a title shot after winning a fight where they were not convincent enought, that's just sad and it sucks

Look at Rampage vs Lyoto. Yep, Quinton may have won 2 rounds, but he had nothing for Lyoto, and he reconigzed that after the judges decision.

That's why i miss pride days, where fighters always wanted to put a beating/ass whoopíng on their opponents, not just winning by the rules.

If the winner should be ashamed then what should the loser be?

This was not a controversial decision. It was clearly 3 rounds to 2 in favor of Bisping. I always root against Bisping but he won the fight. Learn how to separate your likes/dislikes of certain fighters and objectively judge the fight.

Bisping should be proud. He earned a decision. On the other hand, Anderson has nothing to be ashamed of. He had his moments but he lost. Even though he is past his prime still think that Anderson is still the better fighter. The better fighter loses sometimes though just like Silva did Saturday. Accept it and move on.
 
Bisping goating over getting beat up by Hammil comes to mind.

Much better example. Bisping should have been ashamed of gloating over winning a decision that he clearly lost. Bisping actually deserved the win over Silva.
 
Fighters fighting just to win 3 rounds, or fighting not to lose; Or winning a crappy and controversial decision;
That's the scenario of MMA today; Fighters and fans discussing who won some round, who controlled more the actions when actually nothing happened;

That's just sad, and Anderson vs Bisping was a big example of that, a guy after getting his face dismantled, wins a controversial decision, and then fans and himself starts to celebrate, as he did something great;

Romero also should be ashamed of that Win over Jacare, after getting dominated in the later rounds;

Fighters asking for a title shot after winning a fight where they were not convincent enought, that's just sad and it sucks

Look at Rampage vs Lyoto. Yep, Quinton may have won 2 rounds, but he had nothing for Lyoto, and he reconigzed that after the judges decision.

That's why i miss pride days, where fighters always wanted to put a beating/ass whoopíng on their opponents, not just winning by the rules.

Ever hear the term losing a battle but winning the war.

You need to pipe down.
 
Unfortunately it's common knowledge Bisping doesn't have much to throw at anyone.

A complete and utter lie.
Within the fighter community it is known Bisping hits very hard .

Only people that try and spread that lie is haters like yourself.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,307
Messages
58,275,541
Members
175,990
Latest member
gorakk
Back
Top