Female rock singer pees on man's head on stage

Not click bait :) bet you all clicked on this thread

Sophia Urista, 36, the frontwoman for cover band Brass Against urinated over a fan after telling the audience she needed to pee but couldn't make the bathroom

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...RINATES-fans-face-stage-shocked-audience.html

3ce76c8fbdab0544ab3a9a7189d6183d

50530955-10205627-image-a-17_1637021025815.jpg

Donald Trump wishes he was there.<TheDonald>
 
Watched the video, I think if she went too far at any point it was when she was screaming at his face 'security get him the fuck out of here' repeatedly AFTER she peed on him.

Like shit you just took the dudes soul in front of the whole world at least have some fucking courtesy you psycho.
Lol that was my takeaway as well.
 
They are opening for Tool in Copenhagen in April. Guess I better stay out of the pit.
You're going to the show??? Tickets were sold out so fast I didn't manage to grab one. Read they were seated though. Saw Tool at Copenhell in 2019 and at Roskilde Festival 2006 which was mind blowing. Would have loved to see them at the 2001 concert though back when Maynard could still scream his lungs out, but alas I was 12 years old.
 
ehh maybe if she didn't have a boys haircut and was hot it would be ok.
 
The real news story here is Nicole Shields, a woman at the concert who was dumb enough to call 911 over the incident.

That's not an emergency, dumbass. Take 3 seconds to Google the non-emergency line for the police and report it that way.
 
You're going to the show??? Tickets were sold out so fast I didn't manage to grab one. Read they were seated though. Saw Tool at Copenhell in 2019 and at Roskilde Festival 2006 which was mind blowing. Would have loved to see them at the 2001 concert though back when Maynard could still scream his lungs out, but alas I was 12 years old.
Yeah got 5 tickets. Also saw them in 06 at Roskilde
 
Watched the video, I think if she went too far at any point it was when she was screaming at his face 'security get him the fuck out of here' repeatedly AFTER she peed on him.

Like shit you just took the dudes soul in front of the whole world at least have some fucking courtesy you psycho.
Yea, I didn't understand that part.

Why'd she kick him out?
 
Plenty of foot fetish weirdos on here, so this probably doesn’t even raise an eye brow to most on here. My guess is there’d be a long line of sherdoggers volunteering for that job.
Why's it weird to love women's feet!?
 
Psychology moment!

Woman's pee contains some pheromones, expecially pee coming from ovulation days, and heterosexual males find this hodor disgustingly appealing.
In experiments men were able to tell women's pee from men's pee from the smell, with shocking precision when it came to ovulation day piss.
Apparently, lesbians do the same, so this would mean the mechanism developes as the person grows and it's not there at birth.

If anyone's wondering if men have a similar thing: yes we do and it's sweat, particularly armpit and ball sweat.

So if you've ever wondered what that golden shower shit is about, wonder no more.

(For girls it has a different meaning, but it's not the matter at hand so I'll shut up)

Well shit. I wasn't expecting to learn that today, but thanks.
 
Psychology moment!

Woman's pee contains some pheromones, expecially pee coming from ovulation days, and heterosexual males find this hodor disgustingly appealing.
In experiments men were able to tell women's pee from men's pee from the smell, with shocking precision when it came to ovulation day piss.
Apparently, lesbians do the same, so this would mean the mechanism developes as the person grows and it's not there at birth.

If anyone's wondering if men have a similar thing: yes we do and it's sweat, particularly armpit and ball sweat.

So if you've ever wondered what that golden shower shit is about, wonder no more.

(For girls it has a different meaning, but it's not the matter at hand so I'll shut up)
I can only imagine a million years ago dude's were sniff women's pee puddles to determine whether or a not she was approaching her heat cycle.

That's another thing that bothers me if women's cycles sync up wouldn't that mean in ancient times a whole tribe would be fertile at the same time? How is one Don Juan going to bang all the ladies in the tribe in a few days to make babies?
 
I can only imagine a million years ago dude's were sniff women's pee puddles to determine whether or a not she was approaching her heat cycle.

That's another thing that bothers me if women's cycles sync up wouldn't that mean in ancient times a whole tribe would be fertile at the same time? How is one Don Juan going to bang all the ladies in the tribe in a few days to make babies?

Well evolution doesn't follow a design, shit just happens, animals fuck and they are stuck with it. Usually we assume the trait is the one that made it easier to spread the genes but sometimes it's true, sometimes it's just random and the animal gets to pin some broad down and rape 26 babies into her.

Plus it's not like pheromones are ONLY in piss, women and men have them floating around in their genitalia and armpits and are not an independent developement, but something we inherited from monkeys and don't use as much, as they have very little social significance in our interactions and by themselves aren't gonna attract anyone like it happens for - say - some insects.

Plus human women have less use for pheromones as, since they have long and excruciating pregnancy periods and, once born, the kid is notoriously a little useless sack of shit, they used to need protection from men in tribes and groups. So they aren't just horny and ready to fuck during ovulation (when clearly they are hornier and readier) but throughout the period and even during pregnancy, this suggests that unlike other animals their horniness isn't controlled by estrogens but a mix of hormones including testosterone as well, making them far more similar to men than in most animal species.

Again, this mechanism aren't by design, they were random mutations and were passed because apparently women that had them didn't become sad prehistorical single moms or whatever.
 
Well evolution doesn't follow a design, shit just happens, animals fuck and they are stuck with it. Usually we assume the trait is the one that made it easier to spread the genes but sometimes it's true, sometimes it's just random and the animal gets to pin some broad down and rape 26 babies into her.

Plus it's not like pheromones are ONLY in piss, women and men have them floating around in their genitalia and armpits and are not an independent developement, but something we inherited from monkeys and don't use as much, as they have very little social significance in our interactions and by themselves aren't gonna attract anyone like it happens for - say - some insects.

Plus human women have less use for pheromones as, since they have long and excruciating pregnancy periods and, once born, the kid is notoriously a little useless sack of shit, they used to need protection from men in tribes and groups. So they aren't just horny and ready to fuck during ovulation (when clearly they are hornier and readier) but throughout the period and even during pregnancy, this suggests that unlike other animals their horniness isn't controlled by estrogens but a mix of hormones including testosterone as well, making them far more similar to men than in most animal species.

Again, this mechanism aren't by design, they were random mutations and were passed because apparently women that had them didn't become sad prehistorical single moms or whatever.
The mutation is random but the selection bias shouldn't be. There's an evolutionary benefit to human women being capable of sex outside of their heat cycles. Maybe they can keep a man's protection/resources from wondering 75% of the month?

Evolutionary psychology doesn't ring all that well developed with me atleast with concern to humans. Things are a lot more honest with other animals and even the great apes. Very interesting though.
 
The mutation is random but the selection bias shouldn't be. There's an evolutionary benefit to human women being capable of sex outside of their heat cycles. Maybe they can keep a man's protection/resources from wondering 75% of the month?

Evolutionary psychology doesn't ring all that well developed with me atleast with concern to humans. Things are a lot more honest with other animals and even the great apes. Very interesting though.

Well evolutionary psychology is interesting but ends up being mostly bullshit we have no proof of, that's why I thread very lightly with giving meaning and desing to mutations that occur randomly and have many ways to impact the mind we have no idea of.
Moreover, we know basically jack shit about prehiatorical societies. We assume they were gigachads hunting tigers and smashing broads because we're dumb idiots, but it's obviously not true, their societies surely had traditions, strange customs and all the kinds of things that make us awesome even today, we just have very little lasting evidence of what that was exactly.

There are a ton of tribes and peoples living in prehistorical conditions today with very complex societies and same goes for them native Americans before the genocide, of which we have many recounts and memories, but don't know how close or far they were from 10thousand BC societies.

The evolutionary benefit of permanently horny women is undeniable though and I do bow my head and thank the gene pool for that every day.
 
I once accidentally watched some piss porn as a young teenager. The words "open wider" now trigger me.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,306
Messages
58,275,374
Members
175,990
Latest member
gorakk
Back
Top