Social Female reporter gets groped on live TV.

Men boast and women cower. A good analogy for straight men would be "do you feel comfortable in a locker room situation full of bigger and stronger gay guys"?
Ab-thou-lutely.
 
That's fucked up.

I wonder what Dude's wife or any other female relative thinks of this guy? What his level of respect for them must be, that he entitled himself to clap the cute female reporter on her butt like that?

I'd feel the same way if a woman did it to a man, as well: Touch-Butt without consent aint cool.
It's very hard to respect people like that. All I see is lack of self-control and respect for boundaries. Weak.
 
High testosterone allows one to stay calm and cool in situations like that. Being physically larger and stronger makes you feel less vulnerable. Even if people are more likely to come to a woman's defense after the fact, that's not something you think about in the heat of the moment.
Actually, yeah I can understand that point of view, I guess I'm thinking from my own perspective.
 
This is groping.
image033.gif

Oh, my.
 
I would not give a shit. It was an old man patting a grown woman on the ass. He probably thought it was funny.

I would not be like you and challenge the old geezer to a fight . But then again the old man could probably beat your trifling ass

Your definitely trolling now or maybe you really are this stupid.
 
Liberal women: We want equal rights and to be treated the same as men!

Also liberal women: *Man makes insensitive joke*
Omgz you sexist pig!

Rampage: *Busy humping reporter*
 
What's even less hilarious is being honor killed for being raped. I made it religious cause of the irony.

Yeh.....if I or anyone else here had been justifying that, then you might have had a point. Since we weren’t, you just showed yourself to be an idiot.

This is the stupidity of your post summed up:

Some white men on here talk about how murder is wrong - and then you come in and say how hilarious it is that white men are talking about the evils of murder when some other white men are responsible for so much killings and death. To repeat, you’re an idiot.
 
Liberal women: We want equal rights and to be treated the same as men!

Also liberal women: *Man makes insensitive joke*
Omgz you sexist pig!

Rampage: *Busy humping reporter*
SillySingleBangeltiger-size_restricted.gif
 
Liberal women: We want equal rights and to be treated the same as men!

Also liberal women: *Man makes insensitive joke*
Omgz you sexist pig!

Rampage: *Busy humping reporter*
I'm pretty sure feminists have always been against sexual assault but okay.
 
I mean, sure, the backlash is probably disproportionate to the crime.

But c'mon now.

Is it that hard to not touch a woman inappropriately?

He's a dumbass. Fuck 'im.
 
I mean, sure, the backlash is probably disproportionate to the crime.

But c'mon now.

Is it that hard to not touch a woman inappropriately?

He's a dumbass. Fuck 'im.
The backlash might be disproportionate because of how many people passionately defend it.
 
The real question is: did he sniff his fingers afterwards?

J/K of course, not cool at all.

However I do want to add this: Often times such behavior is "ok" if the female thinks the guy is "cute". If not it's sexual assault or harassment. I'm against unwanted touching and so forth, but these days the women hold all the cards. If she decides to take action that guy is fucked.
 
Lol wtf at some of these replies here

On national TV , some dork treated her like a sexual piece of meat. That's embarrassing. And now people all over the country are talking about how someone smacked her ass while she was just trying to do her job.
There's not even an equivalent for a dude on this. There's no fear of getting raped by a woman, and even if the chick that slapped your ass was ugly, it still makes you a stud on some level. This is a uniquely chick problem. People are gonna always remember her as the reporter that got her ass smacked, and there's always going to be a sexual component to that--itd be one thing if it were at a club, but at your job?

Should the guy get his dick chopped off? No. But that was a big deal, and at the bare minimum worthy of an ass beating.
I don't think anyone would have ever even known had she not reacted like she saw her dog shot. Then she goes on to tweet about it bringing more attention. Not like anyone will remember her next week, let alone for remember her for this.

That said I'm not a fan of the move, big reason I don't touch anyone is I don't know their boundaries. It happens for an instant and I can't know what he was thinking, but I'm not 100% sure he was being sexual. Dude is mid-race and definitely not thinking very clearly, like fuck him but that's about as far as it probably should go in my book.

But that's the thing about laying hands on someone else, you never know what the consequences will be and you opened the door for breaking boundaries already.
 
"In a video viewed more than 10 million times, Bozarjian was seen recoiling in shock as a runner in a hat and sunglasses smacked her as he ran past."

Probably the best thing that ever happened to her, publicity-wise.

Maybe she can turn it into a money-making gig.
 
<{Heymansnicker}>




Maybe try another edit and see if you can make it funny this time...


9z8i.jpg





I haven’t watched the nfl since The Bus was on the Steelers. I couldn’t care less. I just find it amusing you parrot such a fraud.

giphy.webp
 
I had a tranny touch my shit once, so I understand how uncomfortable it can be.
<{clintugh}>
 
Keep your hands to yourself is probably one of the earliest rules you learn as a child.

You would think this is a pretty cut and dry bad act on the guy's part. Whatever consequences come his way are 100% appropriate because his actions were 100% avoidable. However, in true internet fashion, you will always find people defending the indefensible.
 
Keep your hands to yourself is probably one of the earliest rules you learn as a child.

You would think this is a pretty cut and dry bad act on the guy's part. Whatever consequences come his way are 100% appropriate because his actions were 100% avoidable. However, in true internet fashion, you will always find people defending the indefensible.

Eh, I don't know about that. Consequences should be proportionate to the action. We learned that during the inquisitions, witch burning trials, and other forms of "mob justice" in human history. The hive-mind tends to be rather merciless when people start encouraging each other to take action. Almost becomes a "contest" of egos, in each person trying to be more and more "just" than the other, losing sight of the original context. The individual incidents themselves are reduced to serving as just a "prop", in the sight of a larger "social struggle".

For sure, he can be publicly called out for it, encouraged to apologize, and so forth, but I think we do have to set a reasonable limit to what sort of "consequences" ought to be expected.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top