• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

Federal Ban on scientists making lethal viruses is lifted

HockeyBjj

Putting on the foil
Staff member
Senior Moderator
Joined
Jun 26, 2012
Messages
31,897
Reaction score
42,261
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/12/19/health/lethal-viruses-nih.html?referer=http://m.facebook.com

What could possibly go wrong here? At least a zombie apocalypse sounds more fun than a nuclear one

Some scientists are eager to pursue these studies because they may show, for example, how a bird flu could mutate to more easily infect humans, or could yield clues to making a better vaccine.

Critics say these researchers risk creating a monster germ that could escape the lab and seed a pandemic.

Now, a government panel will require that researchers show that their studies in this area are scientifically sound and that they will be done in a high-security lab.

The pathogen to be modified must pose a serious health threat, and the work must produce knowledge — such as a vaccine — that would benefit humans. Finally, there must be no safer way to do the research.

In seriousness, mutating a virus to be a step ahead of where it is now so that a vaccine/treatment can be made ready instead of scrambling after an outbreak is the goal here. If it’s done safely and in a very tightly controlled lab it can certainly be a good thing. But damn if it doesn’t sound scary and playing with fire. Article mentions a lab creating an Ebola virus that can transmit through the air would be in the program, but can you imagine if a single carrier of that monster bug got out into the public?
 
well doesn't half this forum want the apocalypse? so this a good thing! go USA you nuts!
 
I thought we were already creating the worst viruses and experimenting on the global population that is why it's been easier to contain some of these "pandemic global killers"
 
Bad idea if we're cutting CDC funding. Also ebola would require a lot of monkeying to get to airborne, so that would be really stupid and dangerous.
 
Bad idea if we're cutting CDC funding. Also ebola would require a lot of monkeying to get to airborne, so that would be really stupid and dangerous.

That was an example given by the writer of an article, not by a scientist that was going to work on that. Hopefully the guys who know what they’re doing stick to little things like during the bird flu scare, getting one that *could* jump to humans so that if/when the wild one did a treatment would be closer to ready for it. That wouldn’t take much monkeying since the bird flu one was on the brink of it naturally
 
Bad idea if we're cutting CDC funding. Also ebola would require a lot of monkeying to get to airborne, so that would be really stupid and dangerous.




Ban for racism.
 
well doesn't half this forum want the apocalypse? so this a good thing! go USA you nuts!



Yup. And the other half wants nothing but science.


This is a great compromise, meeting halfway if you will.
 
Excellent, one step closer to zombie plague.
 
I doubt China and Russia ever stopped doing that, so I'm not that concerned. But it still sounds scary. I hope they develop something cool
 
Does anyone here truly believe they have the necessary skills and mentality to survive if a global pandemic brought the world to its knees? Greatly reduced population, scarcity of basic resources, inevitable social decay and predation, loss and or decay of infrastructure...
 
Does anyone here truly believe they have the necessary skills and mentality to survive if a global pandemic brought the world to its knees? Greatly reduced population, scarcity of basic resources, inevitable social decay and predation, loss and or decay of infrastructure...

Keep going...I'm nearly there...
 
Back
Top