The Clinton Foundation has been used as a for-profit operating under charity for years. It started off with a company called CESC (Clinton Executive Services Corp). CESC is also the company who paid for the email servers.
Here is an email discussing the potential for exposure when the proposition to move CESC into the CF building is discussed. Why would they care about exposure? Because it would bring investigation.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/45082
a. Do we want to move these personnel from Harlem? Keep in mind that we risk exposure because it will mean GSA is paying for an empty 8600 squarefeet until August 2014, our first out option. We have landlords who aren’t happy we moved most of our operations out of their building and wouldn’t mind leaking an empty floor to the press.
b. If we are okay with taking the exposure risk, do we envision the auditors coming back and recommending (and BC accepting) that CESC shouldnot operate within CF space even with a sub-lease agreement?
c. The advantages of course are obvious – better business continuity, management, etc.
They knew that thing were getting to be sketchy, so they came up with a way to hide everything. In the form of a company called Teneo. Teneo was founded by long-time Clinton Aide Douglas Band and Declan Kelly. Declan Kelly was appointed a position at the State Department by Hillary Clinton:
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/teneo-final-221807
After Teneo was created, Chelsea Clinton smelled something fishy about that organization and started investigating it. Here are a few of the claims she found:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/39916
A former MF Global employee accused former president William J. Clinton of collecting $50,000 per month through his Teneo advisory firm in the months before the brokerage careened towards its Halloween filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
Teneo was hired by MF Global’s former CEO Jon S. Corzine to improve his image and to enhance his connections with Clinton’s political family, said the employee, who asked that his name be withheld because he feared retribution.
Why would Jon Corzine do that for Bill Clinton? Because they had been friends for a long time… He served on a presidential committee for Bill Clinton and on a Department of Treasury’s borrowing committee. Take a look through the MF Global bankruptcy and the whole thing reeks:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MF_Global
Here is another lovely quote from that same email:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/39916
voiced serious concerns to Bari - including telling her Ilya has called Members of the House and Members of Parliament, "on behalf of President Clinton," for Teneo clients (eg for Andrew Liveris and Dow who's coming this month to London), without my father's knowledge and inelegantly and ineffectually at best and at worse has now precipitating people in London making comparisons between my father and Tony Blair's profit motivations.
Who is Ilya? Ilya Aspis is a special assistant to Bill Clinton at the Clinton Foundation
All of this really angered Brad, because he felt that she shouldn’t just come after him, since everyone involved does it. Read this email where he discusses his feelings about Chelsea Clinton investigating Teneo:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21496
Justin and I already are not employees of the foundation. We are employees of cesc. But we could make it more official as advisors to it or something. Otherwise, raising money for it would be odd with no connectivity
Ira runs chai and has been doing outside consulting all these years
Bob harrison has a ton of goldman stock and makes decisions on gold mans engagement/role in cgi
Valerie uses office space of a donor in chicago
Bruce was paid by his law firm for years and may still be
People sit on boards, for profit ones and not for profit ones
I am sure there are many others we don't know about
Here is another email where he expresses his concerns to Cheryl Mills and john Podesta:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/36761
I'm also starting to worry that if this story gets out, we are screwed. Dk and I built a business. 65 people work for us who have wives and husbands and kids, they all depend on us. Our business has almost nothing to do with the clintons, the foundation or cgi in any way. The chairman of ubs could care a less about cgi. Our fund clients who we do restructuring and m and a advising the same just as bhp nor tivo do. These are real companies who we provide real advice to through very serious people. Comm head for goldman, dep press secretary to bloomberg, former head of banking, and his team, from morgan stanley for asia and latin am.
Here is Brad losing his crap again about the connections between Teneo and the Clinton Foundation:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/46430
I have to agree. I think there WJC may have some real serious conflicts if we start to make too many rules. It may be time to update some procedures but we can not ignore the nexus of WJC's life.
Also. I signed a conflict of interest policy as a board member of cgi. On it, I wrote that my wife designs bags for cgi, and loses money doing so plus donating her time.And that teneo represents 4 cgi sponsors, 3 of which teneo brought to cgi. Oddly, wjc does not have to sign such a document even though he is personally paid by 3 cgi sponsors, gets many expensive gifts from them, some that are at home etc
I could add 500 different examples of things like this and while I removed lasry bc they are all on the offense, I get the sense that they are trying to put some sort of wrong doing on me after the audit as a crutch to change things and if I don't mention things like lasry where they all have issues, I may regret it
Here he is talking about how they can restructure the foundation to avoid suspicion:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/42839
For teneo, well before mf global, we have been discussing this. Its going to hurt teneo to have wjc on the adv bd any longer but we need come up with a reorg concept for the relationship with wjc and teneo that is lower key and handled privately and properly that we should discuss
Here is the email where they propose the actual restructuring, notice what I quote. They did this to pretend to be a real division to anyone outside, and were concerned about anything that makes it appear otherwise:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/38408
HR and I had a follow up discussion and HR reminded me that CESC is currently served by the multi plan benefit network and thus would this new CESC allow it's employees currently accessing CF benefits to retain those benefits rather than force them to switch to CF. I thought this would be legally difficult if we are trying to formalize the lines, perception and real, but you all tell me Here is a claim from
Here is some different lines of communication that I found that involve their reaction to accusations about foul play, and how to divert attention:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/46014
I’m sensitive to that (which is why I’m asking) but those CHAI Stats are on nearly every public listing of CF accomplishment. I’m want to make people think twice about calls for dropping grants to CF or return the money and the HIV/AIDS work hits home in a way that other stats don’t. Plus it’s international work. I’m concerned about saying we used money to fund healthy schools (because we didn’t use the funding for that)
CHAI = Clinton Health Access Initiative
They are discussing using CHAI's good deeds to deflect allegations about foreign conflicts of interest still being allowed to donate.
This also seems to follow the same issue, but a couple of months later:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/46877
Should we do another convo w Maura about really beefing up their efforts? Still feels like their plan to push accomplishments is thin. Or am I just being anxious?
WHAT WOULD SHE HAVE TO FEEL ANXIOUS ABOUT???
That’s all I have so far, but it’s a start and it tells us what to look for. Here is a document listing the major Teneo players that also donate to the foundation:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/?file=teneo&count=50#searchresult
Lastly, here is somewhat of a confirmation about FBIanon's statement that the emails were all a distraction:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/47350
Agree? Foundation stuff struck me as more interesting to press than public. Emails strike me as a good piece of yarn to pull on. Thoughts?
TLDR;
*Clinton was using influence to make money via CESC, and funneling through charity
*Clinton's feared allegations, so needed a new way to funnel money
*Long-time Clinton staff member Douglas Band and Hillary appointed Secretary of State member Declan Kelly make company called Teneo
*Chelsea Clinton started investigating Teneo b/c it struck her as odd
*Chelsea found evidence of corruption
*Chelsea pissed off Band, because she singled him out. He mentions other corrupt ties with CF staff (eg. Goldman Sachs)
*More yet to be found
https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/5b6is7/no_bs_i_found_it_this_is_the_clinton_foundation/