FBI reopens Clinton investigation as new emails found PART 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not very sporty to beat up an old grouchy man.

16534.jpg
 
Hah! Well, I suppose it might have been his fault rather than her leaving her yahoo account configured on the device. I'm sure Huma would be more than willing to throw him under the bus at this stage.

The problem is if those emails contain classified information she'll be under that bus as well.
 
The problem is if those emails contain classified information she'll be under that bus as well.

Be interesting to see what, if anything, does come of it. I imagine it'll be a while.
 
Even if you are higher up, I'm not impressed by you. I was in long enough to learn that there's a lot of dumb fuckers who made 20 years brown nosing their way up the chain. There are plenty of stupid SNCOs and officers. .

Ok I agree with you here. Not in the sense that this applies to @SMEAC because I honestly didn't follow the whole conversation I just noticed you appeared to have called him out. But if you made this statement you clearly have a good head on your shoulders. Many members do this and "time in" certainly doesn't always mean you know more.
 
I thought Abedin was the one that would be likely to face a perjury charge (in relation to saying she'd provided all the relevant devices, but hadn't handed over the laptop)?

O I wasn't speaking to who would likely be charged, I just know that Hillary is a classic, very high functioning slime ball lawyer who has skirted the line for decades and she's likely committed perjury more times than you've wacked off. She's guilty of perjury in this case but unfortunately for us she hasn't been anal raped over it.
 
Ok I agree with you here. Not in the sense that this applies to @SMEAC because I honestly didn't follow the whole conversation I just noticed you appeared to have called him out. But if you made this statement you clearly have a good head on your shoulders. Many members do this and "time in" certainly doesn't always mean you know more.

Our differences go back well before this thread. He should know by now to just ignore me, but he always has to open his mouth and start shit.

Tito's noggin never ceases to make me lol

Tito has a cro-magnon head.
 
Our differences go back well before this thread. He should know by now to just ignore me, but he always has to open his mouth and start shit.
.

We all open our mouths and start shit here. I'm not sure if I buy the fact you wanted to meet up and hug it out, my spidy senses tell me you called him out internet bluff style and then after 3 other posters quoted you you readjusted your position.

:)
 
Be interesting to see what, if anything, does come of it. I imagine it'll be a while.

Yea I think it'll be a while but with so many people working on this now maybe not.
 
Ugh, too bad that it had to be Trump running against this corrupt old hag. So much of this shit that's coming out is just confirming what so many of us assumed for years: that the ruling elite are crooked as shit. I definitely believe that the swamp needs to be drained, but I don't see that orange-skinned pos as the one to do it. In fact, the swamp would probably be more putrid if he's the one in charge.

It would be so much better if a person of integrity, who is really for the people, were leading the charge against Hilldog and her partners in crime. But I guess the system is set up to keep someone like that far away from any serious position of power.
 
what would happen if Hillary wins and gets indicted down the road. would she face impeachment??
would Kane take over the presidency??

If it happens before January 20th, 2017, Obama gets one more year in office.
 
It would be so much better if a person of integrity, who is really for the people, were leading the charge against Hilldog and her partners in crime.

I agree.

But two of them dropped out after the first debate, and the last closed up shop after the first primary.

It would have been nice if one or two honest candidates came a bit closer to winning the nomination.
 
Look at you trying to use big words for once. Did someone pull out the dictionary? I know as much as the next person about strategic affairs in the middle east because I'm educated and experienced, plus I have friends and family who have dedicated decades of their life to that region. It certainly makes me as qualified as someone who's basing their opinion from listening to Glenn Beck's show.

I don't have to try to sound intelligent on a MMA board. Last time we spoke you complained that I wrote too many words. Not exactly a high bar of intelligence is being set here. Even if you are higher up, I'm not impressed by you. I was in long enough to learn that there's a lot of dumb fuckers who made 20 years brown nosing their way up the chain. There are plenty of stupid SNCOs and officers. You seem to fit the bill. You've ignored me every time I've asked what you did in the military, so I get to be creative with your backstory whenever you come out of whatever hole you came from. You go out of your way to try and start shit with me when I'm not even addressing you. I'm proud of what I did in my time in the service. I'm even more proud of what I've accomplished afterwards.

Of course you would be the one stupid enough to equate me saying that Trump is a piece of shit to "I don't support the constitution" and I don't care about national security.



@Junes @Dolomite @Tropodan

No I'm not challenging him to a fight on a message board. I was joking with the guy who recommended we hug it out. Besides, SMEAC has too much bitch running through his blood for that to ever get setup.

Am I the one explicitly equating my service to strategic expertise?

I have no need to get in specifics of my DD214s, ERB, SRB or units (especially with a jackwagon who thinks internet callouts are a thing); but if you want a pissing contest I have 48 months of combat pay and all in leadership positions as an infantryman. And InB4 you try and call bullshit @lfd0311 and myself can talk about the AO we shared.

You seem rather bitter about your failures as a Marine, I'm sure it was all your superiors fault. Well that and your peers being better than you.

You cling to your thought that you're smart because I said you use words to make up for your lack of a point.
 
O I wasn't speaking to who would likely be charged, I just know that Hillary is a classic, very high functioning slime ball lawyer who has skirted the line for decades and she's likely committed perjury more times than you've wacked off. She's guilty of perjury in this case but unfortunately for us she hasn't been anal raped over it.
lets not get carried away here, I've told you a million times not to exaggerate
 
They can vote to impeach, it's no guarantee that an indictment will lead to that. It depends highly on the makeup of the congress and the size of her victory, too. If she was convicted of something serious, she would almost certainly step down. Then, the VP would become President, though she could angle for a better replacement than Kaine if she's so inclined, having him step down, and pushing a preferred alternative through congress.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top