@Ayin
Issues that show this was a poorly conducted investigation besides the outcome.
2. Why was Clinton interviewed with no recording and not under oath? Huma was.
3. Why were persons of interest granted partial immunity with conditions before their devices were investigated and why were they destroyed? This is an investigation that involves national security; those devices should have been confiscated with warrants and partial immunity should have been withheld for leverage. Huma's emails on Weiner's laptop that shared a server? How was this not found out about until now?
4. Why wasn't a grand jury convened? Who gave Comey the right to wave off any pursuit based on "intent"?
5. She did break the law.
6. Comey admitted that people would be tried for exactly what Clinton did.
7. Kristian Saucier is serving a 1 years jail sentence (prosecution recommended 5) for having 5 confidential documents (Clinton has 110, 22 TOP SECRET).
8. If #7 isn't a big enough double standard, then how about this: