• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

FBI reopens Clinton investigation as new emails found PART 2

Will the FBI release anymore information before Nov 8th?


  • Total voters
    107
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hah! You're looking at the wrong guy for "pay-to-play".
pay to play? I'm just trying to swallow a grudge for all the hate you've thrown at my peeps
a simple act of kindness on your part would go a long way to help with that...
 
n96fHA.jpg
 
Here's the thing.

The FBI already did an extensive investigation and found a mountain of damning evidence but chose not to prosecute even though anyone else would have had the book thrown at them.

So what is the point of pouring through a thousand emails looking for wrongdoing if your official stated position is she is above the law? Imagine another press conference announcing all her new crimes and capping it off with, but we are still not recommending charges.

This is unprecedented. He knows full weight of this. My guess is he had a hand in suppressing evidence and conducting the first investigation in a manner that would get her off. But this evidence was found via an unrelated case by agents that are not corrupted. They probably presented the evidence to Comey with a warning that if he doesn't do the right thing that they will leak it to the media.

He never had a chance to manipulate this investigation. He didn't get to handpicked the agents to conduct it and now has no choice but to conduct a real investigation or destroy all credibility the FBI has.

Realize she is still a huge favorite to win which means he is most likely out of a job for this.
 
Senior Justice Department officials warned the FBI that Director James B. Comey’s decision to notify Congress about renewing the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server was not consistent with long-standing practices of the department, according to officials familiar with the discussions.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...medium=referral&utm_source=huffingtonpost.com




Was it DOJ policy for Loretta to meet with Bill Clinton in the back of your private jet?
 
Don't know what you're trying to say, but there won't be enough evidence to even attempt an indictment, much less get a conviction.


Sorry about that. Using my old phone. It hates sherdog. I can never scroll down in the comment box. I had to post and 're edit. but you are too quick for me.

Anyways, I don't disagree . Nothing will come of it. BUT, I was trying to say, she did break the law....her defense was it was unknowlingly.
 
pay to play? I'm just trying to swallow a grudge for all the hate you've thrown at my peeps
a simple act of kindness on your part would go a long way to help with that...

If there's a "Make Plat" button on here I haven't found it. I've got a few other buttons I'm itching to try out I could give a whirl on your account if you like though...?
 
Here's the thing.

The FBI already did an extensive investigation and found a mountain of damning evidence but chose not to prosecute even though anyone else would have had the book thrown at them.

So what is the point of pouring through a thousand emails looking for wrongdoing if your official stated position is she is above the law? Imagine another press conference announcing all her new crimes and capping it off with, but we are still not recommending charges.

This is unprecedented. He knows full weight of this. My guess is he had a hand in suppressing evidence and conducting the first investigation in a manner that would get her off. But this evidence was found via an unrelated case by agents that are not corrupted. They probably presented the evidence to Comey with a warning that if he doesn't do the right thing that they will leak it to the media.

He never had a chance to manipulate this investigation. He didn't get to handpicked the agents to conduct it and now has no choice but to conduct a real investigation or destroy all credibility the FBI has.

Realize she is still a huge favorite to win which means he is most likely out of a job for this.

I think its Huma's cozy relationship with radical muslims that going to hang her
 
Yawn. We all know she f-ed up and set up her own email server, this is old news. Not a huge crime, I don't see any dark conspiracy behind it. Just a stupid decision.

IMHO there are plenty of other things to go after the Clintons for.
 
If there's a "Make Plat" button on here I haven't found it. I've got a few other buttons I'm itching to try out I could give a whirl on your account if you like though...?
thats what I suspected anyway
 
Former United States Attorney for the District of Columbia Joe diGenova suggested Friday James Comey's reopening of the investigation into Hillary Clinton's emails was the product of a "revolt" inside the FBI.

http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=55756

diGenova went on to say he believes "there is a quiet but serious revolt against the director right now."

"He sent those letters today because he is in deep trouble inside the bureau," he said. "Comey sent this letter today because he had to. He has no moral authority inside the agency right now, he's a joke, he's a laughingstock of the agency, and among former FBI agents, he has become an anathema."
 
wasn't Gen Petreus fired for much less egregious violations of OpSec?

just saying
 
thats why I'm saying there's no waaaay he doesn't have the smoking gun
I'm thinking if there was any possible way for Comey to avoid having to reopen this can of worms, he would have.

Unless this is just some bullshit ploy to make it look like they're keeping an eye on clinton when they really aren't going to do shit...submarine move.
 
Larry O'Connor, diGenova was asked what Comey meant by saying newly discovered Clinton emails from Anthony Weiner and Huma Abedin's devices "appear to be pertinent" to the FBI's prior investigation.

wait, I thought Comey didn't know if they were significant?

please tell me you guys aren't repeating jacks spin as facts?
 
from the BBC's link:

While speaking with WMAL's Larry O'Connor, diGenova was asked what Comey meant by saying newly discovered Clinton emails from Anthony Weiner and Huma Abedin's devices "appear to be pertinent" to the FBI's prior investigation.

"It tells me that the original investigation was not thorough, and that it was an incompetent investigation," diGenova said, "otherwise they would have discovered this -- and I'll tell you why."

"These were found on the phone that was used by Anthony Weiner and Huma Abedin," he said. "Why was that phone not looked at originally?"

"There could be one explanation: Huma Abedin may have denied that any other phone existed, and if she did, she committed a felony. She lied to the FBI just like General Cartwright, and if she did, she's dead meat, and Comey knows it, and there's nothing he can do about it."

diGenova continued: "And why this letter was sent today was very simple: the agents came to Comey yesterday, they told him about the evidence, and he said oh 'S', and realized that his goose was cooked, that this would prove conclusively that his original investigation was incompetent, and he knew that the agents running the Weiner case would leak it if he did not send this letter to congress."

"And I've also been told something very significant, it's been reported that those laptops [belonging to Clinton aides Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson] were destroyed, they were not, and the reason is the FBI agents refused to do it."
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top