Favorite War Room Posters

[Pwent]

It's funny that someone with a wealth of knowledge on economics far greater than yours is actually making the statements that you're coming out with.

You don't have to like Jack but he's far more knowledgable than 99% of the people on here.

Also backs things up with facts and links that verify his facts.


But stick to the CNN thing and ride that wave until your boner goes down

For the bold and underlined parts

<{cruzshake}>

 

[badascan]

two words... circle jerk...

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

For the bold and underlined parts

<{cruzshake}>

No offense dude, if you have anywhere near the economic acumen of Jack you do a great job disguising it.

 

[Bald1]

Sort of sounds like encouragement.

I can neither confirm or deny my low level of total commitment or lack thereof to this or any other ideas I may or may not be in complete support of depending on my alcohol content level or sober disapproval pending on consultation with Imam Barlows book of Haram or Halal - The Guide to War Room Etiquette.

Apropos pic buddy.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

I can neither confirm or deny my low level of total commitment or lack thereof to this or any other ideas I may or may not be in complete support of depending on my alcohol content level or sober disapproval pending on consultation with Imam Barlows book of Haram or Halal - The Guide to War Room Etiquette.

Apropos pic buddy.

You sound like just the guy to bribe support from with a cabinet position. I'm thinking Minister of Consumption.

 

[irish_thug]

I forgot about @Bald1

Yeah, me too. Like I said, I knew there were others.
Adding @Bald1 and @Cubo de Sangre and @Lead

 

[KONG-D'SNT-TAP]

For the bold and underlined parts

<{cruzshake}>

Yeah sorry pal but Jack crushes you on anything Economic related.

Hell I can't even remember a thread where you said one important thing economics related. Jack crushes it.

Perhaps in your fantasy world you know more but here on earth it's just not true.

And this is just simply noticing reality in front of my face

 

[Trotsky]

I have to say you are probably one of the worst posters here. You act all high and mighty in a thread about racism then 2 days later you wish Ben Shapiro dies from cancer. You're a hypocrite and you seem like a whiny pussy.

So I nominate you as one of the shit posters in the War Room

Aww, are you still fussy about my saying you weren't intelligent enough to be held responsible for your shitty and uninformed policy views?

But, if I'm the pussy, it's awful ironic that you are the one so hurt and emotional that you feel the need to keep following me around, running away when I respond, and then rinsing and repeating in other threads.


Also, lol @ the insinuation that, because racism exists, you can't hate people on individual bases. That's not paradoxical at all. For instance, you may be a black man. I would not dislike you for that reason. But you're also a man-child and someone too moronic to understand your own interests, let alone the perspective of others. That's why I think the world would be better if you offed yourself.

 

[Trotsky]

panamaican and Jack V. Savage have the best substantive posts. Fawlty and Falsedawn (who I don't know from each other tbh), KNGDSNTTAP, and bad seed are posters who are funny and self-aware, which is a fucking premium in this shit sty of Trump-level unawareness and prideful ignorance.

 

[Trotsky]

IDL >Jack V Savage

IDL is using his intelligence for truth.

Jack V Savage is using his intelligence for lying.

@IDL
@Jack V Savage

IDL uses his intelligence to reach conclusions that he wants, even when they are silly, vague, and grandiose. JVS uses his intelligence to reach conclusions that are logical and empirical, even when they are independent of, or contrary to, what he wants.

If you think "IDL > JVS" then you're just a moron. And I don't have much affection for either. I think IDL seems like the more courteous person.

For the bold and underlined parts

<{cruzshake}>

Compared to IDL, JVS's posts are incredibly evidence-based.

Except for this CNN nonsense. I agree that it's a silly statement, although it's also normative and therefore not really a lie akin to someone recalling events that didn't happen. I would agree that CNN had a net-positive effect for Trump and made a fortune off of making their network devoted to him, but that's not how I define "biased for," since the overwhelming tone has been critical, as it should be.

 

[MadSquabbles500]

@unimackpass is pretty good too. @MadSquabbles500 not bad. @MicroBrew is getting better.

thank you, but seriously, I just penus around here. I cannot ever be taken seriously for this.

 

[Pale Man In Black]

No offense dude, if you have anywhere near the economic acumen of Jack you do a great job disguising it.

Yeah, but this isn't an economics forum.

 

[Terry Noonan]

Myself

 

[Bald1]

You sound like just the guy to bribe support from with a cabinet position. I'm thinking Minister of Consumption.

Copious Consumption Cabinet Prefect? I'd need my own badge of office though. How does a hammer(ed) and pickle(d) on a field of barley sounds?

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

Yeah, but this isn't an economics forum.

So? Econ is central to politics and discussed knowledgeably around here. Someone stopping him from joining in and elevating the conversation?

Copious Consumption Cabinet Prefect? I'd need my own badge of office though. How does a hammer(ed) and pickle(d) on a field of barley sounds?

Sounds like fuckin' genius to me. And I should know since I'm two tequila shots and two Bloody Marys in. Gotta get lubed up enough to handle attending a birthday party later.

 

[Pale Man In Black]

So? Econ is central to politics and discussed knowledgeably around here. Someone stopping him from joining in and elevating the conversation?

Sure it is, but that doesn't mean he isn't full of shit in other areas. I'm sure we all have our areas of expertise, just most of us have them in areas outside the realm of politics.
Economics talk comprises a very small portion of the posts here in the WR.

 

[Jack V Savage]

Thanks.

Except for this CNN nonsense. I agree that it's a silly statement, although it's also normative and therefore not really a lie akin to someone recalling events that didn't happen. I would agree that CNN had a net-positive effect for Trump and made a fortune off of making their network devoted to him, but that's not how I define "biased for," since the overwhelming tone has been critical, as it should be.

I don't think we're actually far apart here except on the terminology. I don't argue that it's an ideological thing. They're a business, and their business interests led them to cover Trump in a way that was highly favorable to him (for example, replacing ideological conservatives on their talking-head staff with Trump die-hards in order to maintain a two-way controversy and airing live footage of his rallies). Since the campaign, in order to maintain the standard MSM bullshit both-sides thing (again, for business purposes), they've balanced coverage of the dumpster fire administration with Republican spin. Note that the same study that shows overwhelmingly negative overall coverage shows that 80% of sources quoted are Republicans (that's general rather than specifically for CNN, but I don't see them as being distinguishable from the rest of the MSM except in being more superficial), and only 6% are Democrats. Whatever the collective ideology of the editorial staff (if there is a coherent one, which is unlikely), the practical effect of coverage decisions is a clear pro-Trump bias.

 

[Sexy]

me
@Falsedawn
not @Dr J

anyone who posts int he PWD

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

Sure it is, but that doesn't mean he isn't full of shit in other areas. I'm sure we all have our areas of expertise, just most of us have them in areas outside the realm of politics.
Economics talk comprises a very small portion of the posts here in the WR.

If you're arguing something other than which of those posters is more capable when it comes to discussions of economics then you've yet to solicit my opinion on it. Feel free to ask.

 

[KBE6EKCTAH_CCP]

A few really solid posters here.

Zankou comes to mind. I also like that shit-eating Anglo Bald1.