Social Fakebook sanctions violent threats against "dangerous individuals"?

Discussion in 'The War Room' started by Starman, Jul 10, 2019.

  1. Starman

    Starman Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2014
    Messages:
    3,218
    Likes Received:
    3,328
    Location:
    Mexico?
    Last edited: Jul 10, 2019
    The ScorpioN, SleepyBoy and Happy Man like this.
  2. PHATV

    PHATV FREE RR!!! Double Yellow Card

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2006
    Messages:
    19,617
    Likes Received:
    8,351
    Location:
    Cincinnati
    Then it would be unlike the WR, where you can catch dubs by calling for mobs of masked antifa terrorists attacking innocents and destroying property to be shot. Assuming antifa makes their list, I guess. Wait, they're not on the list? Oh...
    <{vega}>
     
    Happy Man and Starman like this.
  3. PHATV

    PHATV FREE RR!!! Double Yellow Card

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2006
    Messages:
    19,617
    Likes Received:
    8,351
    Location:
    Cincinnati
    This. I cannot like, but do.{<redford}
     
    IngaVovchanchyn likes this.
  4. Leagon

    Leagon Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2007
    Messages:
    10,484
    Likes Received:
    4,528
    Location:
    Vegas
    Look at your av. Say "who the fuck does he think he is?" in yoyr head as superman pours the drink. You can't tell me it doesn't fit.

    I don't disagree with you about Zuck, I was just making fun of your post and av. Your handle is "nostradumbass" and you have that av and say things like "who the fuck does he think he is?" about famous billionaires. It's all v
    True, but both sides are kinda hypocrites on this.

    In schools around the country, children get cyberbullied all the time and it is the Left that has been pushing for legislation to criminalize everything from social media harassment to revenge porn. But they're fine with conservatives getting flamed.

    One the other hand, conservatives have shown little sympathy for children traumatized by cyberbullying, calling them snowflakes, telling them to simply log off social media if they don't want to be bullied. But then they cry and bitch and moan when Mark Zuckerberg doesn't defend their honor.

    I'm at least consistent. It's not Mark Zuckerberg's job to protect anyone's emotions. If the internet is too harsh for anyone, especially adults, they're free to not use it.
     
  5. High Plains Shifter

    High Plains Shifter Space debris belt Double Yellow Card

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2019
    Messages:
    409
    Likes Received:
    616
    Location:
    Middle of Nowhere, Center of Everywhere
    Why would anyone but middle aged moms have that shit to begin with?
    Fucking facebook...
    <DisgustingHHH>
     
  6. sangreporsangre

    sangreporsangre Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2010
    Messages:
    17,421
    Likes Received:
    27,346
    I guarantee you that this will be used to justify unhinged trans activists threatening rape and violence to "TERFs", aka women who believe in biological reality and who want sex-based boundaries.
     
    Starman likes this.
  7. GearSolidMetal

    GearSolidMetal I'm here to chew bubblegum and bang your mom. Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2011
    Messages:
    26,099
    Likes Received:
    83,416
    Location:
    Wichita KS
    Do you honestly think this won't grow from 'extremist groups' to entire political parties?
     
  8. ElKarlo

    ElKarlo Steel Belt

    Joined:
    May 1, 2005
    Messages:
    25,895
    Likes Received:
    4,437
    Location:
    Chiba Japan
    And yet here we are not talking about that. We're talking about what this actually means and if it just means people "who deserve it". Your whataboutism syndrome has hit retarded levels. Get with it and stop botching about things that aren't actually happening. And even if they did, there's a difference between wishing death on terrorist leaders and Alex Jones. Even someone as obnoxious and deep into denial alcan admit that
     
    Stoic1 likes this.
  9. Richie Madano

    Richie Madano White Belt

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2019
    Messages:
    133
    Likes Received:
    223
    If you are on someone’s contact list who has a Facebook profile and accessed it with a smartphone Facebook app, then you may also have FB profile you are unaware of.

    Not sure if that rumor is true but I heard they make dummy accounts for people without profiles.
     
  10. tonni

    tonni Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2017
    Messages:
    11,396
    Likes Received:
    25,598
    Location:
    Belgium
    What's with the attitude? We checked for ourselves, it doesn't say that in the community guidelines. Those are facts, anyone can check it.

    It does look like it was there at one point, but it's changed so I don't see the big deal.
     
  11. Starman

    Starman Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2014
    Messages:
    3,218
    Likes Received:
    3,328
    Location:
    Mexico?
    It already has. As I mentioned earlier, Fakebook’s dangerous individuals list already includes people like Alex Jones, Paul Joseph Watson, Tommy Robinson, Mike Cernovich, and other anti-leftist members of non-establishment media.

    The idea that all this was somehow done just so that Fakebook users could say something bad about terrorists is just leftists running interference as usual.

    The social media giants and most of Silicon Valley have taken a very hard left turn since Trump won. They are on record saying 2016 must never happen again. They have said they will do everything in their power to stop it. And that’s exactly what they are doing.

    Every leftist on this site has reacted to this as predictably as we could all expect. Derp! Fake Newz, bruh. LOLZ. (Proven wrong). Derp! Big deal, bruh. Yer so triggered, snowflake. LULZ.
     
  12. Starman

    Starman Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2014
    Messages:
    3,218
    Likes Received:
    3,328
    Location:
    Mexico?
    Honest journalists (almost an oxymoron at this point) starting to report Fakebook’s stealth editing yesterday:

    https://lauraloomer.us/2019/07/10/b...s-against-dangerous-individuals/#.XScPp8opChA

    https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/f...lls-to-violence-against-dangerous-individuals

    The Google search results on this topic are complete shit, and the mainstream media is of course predictably silent. Who would think that, in this day and age, a social media platform could declare open season on certain individuals, openly endorsing calls of violence, and no one would bat an eye.
     
  13. ocfightfan

    ocfightfan Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2006
    Messages:
    21,623
    Likes Received:
    10,549
    Location:
    In the lab with Jon Jones B sample
    In the end Facebook wants to make billions of dollars off our data and give their preferred political and social actors a free hand for putting their boot on our faces while keeping our hands tied behind our back. They are not in the fairness business.
     
    Cubo de Sangre and Starman like this.
  14. BearGrounds

    BearGrounds A great many scalps.

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2006
    Messages:
    11,690
    Likes Received:
    13,629
    Location:
    On the frontier, west of the Hudson river.
    Dangerous individuals -------------> Dissenters.
     
    Starman likes this.
  15. panamaican

    panamaican Senior Moderator Staff Member Senior Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2009
    Messages:
    36,030
    Likes Received:
    34,305
    Actually, it's a fact. It's stated as such in your own links. The origin of the story and the screen shot came from some guy who was banned from Facebook and is formerly an employee of Alex Jones. That's where I learned it. All of your other links link back to the same original story, not to Facebook itself.

    And I did check Facebook's official standards page. It's not true.

    But I didn't go through your link. I went directly to Facebook's webpage to get there.
     
    Sycho Sid likes this.
  16. Starman

    Starman Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2014
    Messages:
    3,218
    Likes Received:
    3,328
    Location:
    Mexico?
    What is a fact is that they published the guidelines exactly as it was reported by multiple independent news sources. If you weren't a partisan leftist just seeking to push a narrative, you'd click on the archived links to the facebook policy before they altered it yesterday.

    I gave you the link. You can verify it for yourself if you think my screenshot is fake.
     
  17. SleepyBoy

    SleepyBoy Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2003
    Messages:
    12,051
    Likes Received:
    3,512
    Location:
    in bed
    It's official, Sherdog has a higher level of responsibility and accountability then facebook.

    Let that sink, facebook is lower than the OT or the dump.
     
  18. panamaican

    panamaican Senior Moderator Staff Member Senior Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2009
    Messages:
    36,030
    Likes Received:
    34,305
    It was reported by a bunch of sites that don't appear to have done their own look into it. If you google the story, the closest you find to a decent site is rt, breitbart and dailycaller. And the only source provided is as I stated.

    i'll pull my own link to the archived facebook site. I haven't looked at that.
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2019
  19. Starman

    Starman Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2014
    Messages:
    3,218
    Likes Received:
    3,328
    Location:
    Mexico?
    The only one who hasn't "looked into it" is you. The websites got the information right. Their screenshots are real. I went to Facebook and verified it myself. I posted the results. And when they changed it, I posted the archived link where you could find their policy before they edited it.

    You keep talking how no one "appears to have done their own look into it", and yet you admit you haven't looked into it yourself. How dare you accuse others of having not researched it? They have, they're right. You haven't, and you're wrong.

    Do your own research before you make another post about this topic. Your refusal to do so makes you look intellectually dishonest.
     
  20. panamaican

    panamaican Senior Moderator Staff Member Senior Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2009
    Messages:
    36,030
    Likes Received:
    34,305
    You mean, no legitimate website, including Fox News, is supporting this story but random sites which are consistently poor sources are. I doubt you went to facebook and verified anything.

    I followed your link. It's not to the US version of the site, it's written in Portuguese. I'm waiting for the U.S. version to load.

    If it was as you claim - why is your wayback link not to the U.S. language site? Why isn't anyone except fringe sites reporting this story?
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.