Media Even joe rogan and his rat pack think Sean won the fight

2 things Joe is good at, telling when a fighters (He’s) Hurt!, and discussing the intricacies of Chimp Warfare
 
The aliens and reptilians are walking among us bro!
#staywoke
garbage post, if dinosaurs existed and we have evidence, then you think reptilian beings are an impossibility? love your logic...I'll take ancient civilizations accounts over your sarcasm anyday.
 
Ayo, nah my fam1, no lost-bet here, was just vibing with the Canadan language, you know???? Mans probably clocked how Canadan talk's was actualment have that French twist to it, eh my fam?

Appreciate your giving love on my post of mine, keeping it an one-hundred always.

And yo my fams, I was give big ups for the concern, but #Trust, I'm was been keeping it safe out here, ahlie. You too, stay #Blessed and watch for the icy roads, them T-Dot winters ain't playing, eh???

Sending bear love your way, my fam!!!!!1 🐻💯🙌🇨🇦

View attachment 1025368
#PeaceBeWithYou

1. This was not actualment mean woman like it was sound in french. They was just been #Inclusive culture so they assume everyone was have femininity. Do not worry I was not assume mans/womans/otherwises gender, styll.
It's weird, while I read your posts I find them confusing but in the end, everything is clear. You're some kind of prophet ?
If you like French twists, next time I'll make sure to forget switching my autocorrect to English, it randomly adds accents and words, it's great fun.
(Thanks for not implying that I am a femme
cUvCqhO.gif)
 
"Even Joe Rogan" as if Rogan has been a great MMA mind anytime in the last decade. Never mind citing Joey Diaz.
You're right. We should definitely refer to the overly emotional basement dwellers that make up 90% of Sherdog.
 
If real life worked like that then everybody would lose credibility after one bad take/opinion.
And not every bad take/opinion is as bad as another, but Rogan saying that Rousey could beat up half the male bantamweights is monumental in its discrediting of his "authority" on MMA.

Rogan is also the same person who thinks that black people have different and inferior brains to white people, so it's not just one bad take that showcases how much of an idiot he is across the board.

How many genius' out there started off taking L's only to become the genius' they became?
Rogan is not a genius and MMA is not a STEM field.
 
And not every bad take/opinion is as bad as another, but Rogan saying that Rousey could beat up half the male bantamweights is monumental in its discrediting of his "authority" on MMA.

Rogan is also the same person who thinks that black people have different and inferior brains to white people, so it's not just one bad take that showcases how much of an idiot he is across the board.


Rogan is not a genius and MMA is not a STEM field.
It doesnt discredit his opinion, everyone knows he plays company man once in awhile so its understood that you have to take his word with a grain of salt when he is in ufc promotion mode and shilling for a highly marketable fighter the ufc wants to prop up.
 


Joey Diaz says something very telling "when have you seen a bookie with a side job?"

My take:

This fight is what draws were invented for...but of course there are higher interests involved and a draw doesnt equal profit to those that stand to gain, right? I find it absurd that one fighter HAS to win the round, no round draws make it a broken system not made for mma. But yea they want it to be as subjective as possible so fights like these can be steered.

Also Dana has said numerous times before that they want to enter (which really means corner) the South African mma market, well this decision makes sense then doesnt it? Or are the ufc saints and we should give them the benefit of the doubt?

Listen, all I know is that Sean didn't lose that fight

How can you lose when you leave your opponent looking like sloth from the goonies? (Don't worry Rhonda, I'm not making fun of you this time)


View attachment 1025147

* Here, I'll leave you guys this extra gem, after this latest Sean Strickland vs woke reporter debacle, I predict soon disney and ESPN will pressure or downright force Dana and the ufc into abiding by non hate speech rules, laws or regulations. Just watch, it's coming. I hate Dana but one thing I accept and coincide with is his stance on free speech, but he is just a puppet for the elite owned brand and that time is coming closer as we edge into this totalitarian new world order.

( I hope the mods don't move or delete this thread, they have been worse than usual with me, now like 4 out of 5 threads i make get immediately merged or sent to oblivion. If you have some integrity let us talk freely about this, this deserves its own thread. Im asking humbly)


Lol at ' rat pack '
id like if i only could shermano !
 
It doesnt discredit his opinion, everyone knows he plays company man once in awhile so its understood that you have to take his word with a grain of salt when he is in ufc promotion mode and shilling for a highly marketable fighter the ufc wants to prop up.
To draw that line requires a certain level of thinking that most usually aren't capable of

Which isn't to say it's anything special.

We just live in a world where most take things at face value, don't really ask questions or consider what's beneath surface level perception. Trained to operate within a very limited box of awareness.

But that's also what sells tickets and keeps the machine running. If people could see through the masks of the entertainment industry, it wouldn't have the same pull.
 
Whatever "authority" Rogan accumulated over the decades was lost as soon as he said that Rousey could beat half the men in the UFC's bantamweight division.
Rogan is as much a promoter as Dana. He's just more subtle about it.

People know to take what Dana says and does with a grain of salt because it's his job to bullshit, promote and push the ufc narrative.

With Rogan it's more tricky, because he shows a combination of his real opinions, with hyperbolic, promotion inspired rhetoric.

Nobody working for the UFC is someone you can take at face value.
 
Is Joe Rogan's clearly biased rat pack siding with Strickland supposed to be a good thing? This is the guy who commented Jan vs Adesanya saying that Izzy was beating Jan with his feints (Jan won 4-1). Rogan (especially with his podcast gang) has clear bias towards Americans and also whoever is hyped up at the moment
 
If Rogan says Sean won I'm inclined to believe DDP won
 
On the same show, Joe also said that if a fighter ends a round on the ground, round 2 should start there because in a street fight, you don't have to stand up.

Newslfash - This isn't a street fight. It's based on rounds and you start fresh every round.

Every time I hear more from Rogan and his opinion on fighting, the more I dislike him. This the same guy that thinks MMA should take place on a football field as if that would force action....
 
They were watching it live. I had the rounds pretty different when just watching it and getting caught up in the moment. After multiple re watches things looked quite different.
 
Back
Top