European Court rules Employers CAN ban staff from wearing Islamic headscarves and religious symbols

Status
Not open for further replies.
Which feminists told you that?

Theresa%2BCorbin%2BCNN.jpg


and not to mention the "feminists" screaming "Allahu Akbar" at women's marches.

I don't think anyone is in any doubt hes one of the few actual racists i've seen on this forum. Sarcasm or not its disgusting.

{<huh}

got me confused with someone...or...?
 
I don't think anyone is in any doubt hes one of the few actual racists i've seen on this forum. Sarcasm or not its disgusting.
Point to one racist thing he's ever said...i'll wait
 
Why not? I'm not religious.

Crosses already aren't allowed on open display where I work.


That sucks but I understand if it is a private corp. I just don't think Christianity has the monopoly on crosses.
 
because its stupid. people should be able to wear whatever they want as long as it doesnt interfere with their work.
You want to talk to a coworker, not a ninja, this aint medievil japan!
 
How does this fit with the established conspiracy here in the WR, that "the EU" is pushing for Islamic takeover in Europe?

Anyway, nothing suprising if you're familiar with EU case law.
Here's the case if anyone is interested: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/docume...=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=142253

And the conclusion:
Article 2(2)(a) of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation must be interpreted as meaning that the prohibition on wearing an Islamic headscarf, which arises from an internal rule of a private undertaking prohibiting the visible wearing of any political, philosophical or religious sign in the workplace, does not constitute direct discrimination based on religion or belief within the meaning of that directive.

By contrast, such an internal rule of a private undertaking may constitute indirect discrimination within the meaning of Article 2(2)(b) of Directive 2000/78 if it is established that the apparently neutral obligation it imposes results, in fact, in persons adhering to a particular religion or belief being put at a particular disadvantage, unless it is objectively justified by a legitimate aim, such as the pursuit by the employer, in its relations with its customers, of a policy of political, philosophical and religious neutrality, and the means of achieving that aim are appropriate and necessary, which it is for the referring court to ascertain.
 
You want to talk to a coworker, not a ninja, this aint medievil japan!


Its really evident Japan is behind ISIS just look at all those toyota trucks


Edit: Oh I see what you did there!!!
Medievil!!

EVIL!!!
 
Last edited:
How does this fit with the established conspiracy here in the WR, that "the EU" is pushing for Islamic takeover in Europe?

Anyway, nothing suprising if you're familiar with EU case law.
Here's the case if anyone is interested: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/docume...=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=142253

And the conclusion:

It's true, European courts almost always rule in the favour of furthering and promoting Integration, for a recent example, look at France's burqa ban, that was also upheld by European courts.
 
I don't think anyone is in any doubt hes one of the few actual racists i've seen on this forum. Sarcasm or not its disgusting.

I think your racism detector is broken. There's no shortage of them here at all, but I don't remember seeing anything from WhitebeltXL.
 
Theresa%2BCorbin%2BCNN.jpg


and not to mention the "feminists" screaming "Allahu Akbar" at women's marches.



{<huh}

got me confused with someone...or...?
So your example is one person converting and people yelling at rallies. Did they also yell that islam is inherently feminist?
 
I think your racism detector is broken. There's no shortage of them here at all, but I don't remember seeing anything from WhitebeltXL.

I think he's got me confused with someone else, to be honest.
 
I think he's got me confused with someone else, to be honest.

Yeah... maybe he's got you mixed up with Blackened, the many other crypto-white nationalists that think they're successfully walking the line, or any of the long stream of holocaust deniers we've had.
 
Just as the Europeans don't value freedom of speech as much as the US they don't seem to value freedom of religion as much either. Personally I was never triggered by the sight of a cross around someone's neck. Actually Fedor's always looked bad ass to me.
 
Last edited:
wait until a worker is banned for wearing a cross. then u wouldnt like this law very much..
In France, crosses have been banned in many settings like schools since 1905. So I'm not sure if this is a double standard.

That said, it's bullshit imo. Religious freedom and the freedom of expression are both very important to liberal society.
 
Theresa%2BCorbin%2BCNN.jpg


and not to mention the "feminists" screaming "Allahu Akbar" at women's marches.



{<huh}

got me confused with someone...or...?

The idiocracy of the feminist aside.

At the core this is what Islam actually needs. People following it in a way that is compatible with our 2017 western values.
People just following parts of it and make their own 2017 appropriate interpretation.

Similar to Christianity or Buddhism. Just follow it as sort of very loose guide.
And no matter what never cut peoples head off.
 
Nuh huh, feminists told me Islam empowers women and is inherently feminist, you islamaphobic woman hater.

Headscarves are symbols of oppression now? are you a third wave feminist?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top