Crime Eric Clanton, Antifa "Professor Bike Lock" Attacker Arrested!

It's a start

They also found his dating profile where his interests are "bring and end to civilized society" and all his other interests were tryhard edgy antifa shit too
A lot of you guys are certainly on the spectrum.
 
Those nerds have pretty crazy electronic detective skills. Didn't they find Shia Leboef's "secret location" in bumfuck, Tennessee by checking contrails and flight times, then finding a diner, then had a guy honk his horn around the area until it was audible on the stream, then found the "he will not divide us" flag in a field and replaced it with a MAGA tee-shirt?

On a side note, why the hell do so many liberal arts professors have ponytails and earrings in their 40s and 50s? One of the few professions where most of the people are in a complete state of arrested development.

They also got gawker to lose like 90% of their advertisers on their sites by refreshing the pages on every site and tracking the companies that came up on the banners, then spammed the companies with emails and phone calls threatening to boycott them unless they stop advertising on gawker

They also shredded the church of Scientology back in the day. hacked into their shit to expose all of their secret xenu stories you're supposed to pay 100s of thousands of dollars to see

They also spammed every office with faxes of ascii assholes and dicks or whatever
 
It's a start

They also found his dating profile where his interests are "bring and end to civilized society" and all his other interests were tryhard edgy antifa shit too

It's more than a start, they've already convicted him on social media. I just hope it's the right guy.
Of course those responsible don't care anyway, because he's on the "other team".
 
It's more than a start, they've already convicted him on social media. I just hope it's the right guy.
Of course those responsible don't care anyway, because he's on the "other team".

I think it's less of "being on the other team" and more about cracking people's heads open when the guy was trying to calm everyone down
 
I think it's less of "being on the other team" and more about cracking people's heads open when the guy was trying to calm everyone down

I mean they don't care in terms of spreading the accusations based on flimsy proof, and whether they are accusing the wrong man.
Either way he's a "liberal" philosophy professor.
 
I mean they don't care in terms of spreading the accusations based on flimsy proof, and whether they are accusing the wrong man.

Like people blaming the Benghazi attack on a man's youtube video? Same, better, worse? :D
 
C93zFvPV0AAXiwL.jpg
 
Like people blaming the Benghazi attack on a man's youtube video? Same, better, worse? :D

That guy's video did troll up global protests, the Benghazi attack just wasn't one of them.
Your government's false claim that the Benghazi attack started with such a protest is a long way from the sort of trial by social media we see here.
 
He was probably trying to impress some of his female students he was trying to bang
Thats what "art" professors usually do in their spare time
 
Got a link?
Nothing I saw from from the channers (sunglasses, backpack straps and nose/eyebrows) would be enough in court.



Been watching the Sharks game... Had a tweet lined up from a chick at cnn who said the same thing but she was being eviscerated by her followers and seems like she may have took it down in case someone doesn't randomly wack her upside the head with a metal object. Hope a guy at Rebel suffices.

Mentioned in a couple articles today he's going after him.
 
That guy's video did troll up global protests, the Benghazi attack just wasn't one of them.
Your government's false claim that the Benghazi attack started with such a protest is a long way from the sort of trial by social media we see here.

Not sure there's any value in your first sentence, but it seems to reveal a bias.

Just how long a way is it between mainstream and social media when it comes to smearing a man and opening him up to undeserved retribution? I'm certain a rational person sees how the government/MSM would be more damning and more dangerous. Especially malicious since it was scapegoating and not actually trying to bring the full truth to light. Sad that your post sounds like a defense of those actions. Here I thought we could have a chuckle at the expense of politicians. But I guess you'd rather ridicule the people here. :eek::p
 


Been watching the Sharks game... Had a tweet lined up from a chick at cnn who said the same thing but she was being eviscerated by her followers and seems like she may have took it down in case someone doesn't randomly wack her upside the head with a metal object. Hope a guy at Rebel suffices.

Mentioned in a couple articles today he's going after him.


When I was looking over their evidence I saw a few sites which said the victim had laid charges against Clanton, but then corrected themselves to say he "intended" to press charges.
That tweet seems to be what they've all based their claim on.
 
Not sure there's any value in your first sentence, but it seems to reveal a bias.

Just how long a way is it between mainstream and social media when it comes to smearing a man and opening him up to undeserved retribution? I'm certain a rational person sees how the government/MSM would be more damning and more dangerous. Especially malicious since it was scapegoating and not actually trying to bring the full truth to light. Sad that your post sounds like a defense of those actions. Here I thought we could have a chuckle at the expense of politicians. But I guess you'd rather ridicule the people here. :eek::p

I don't see any comparison, the video did in fact spark off international protests. Looks like you're purely deflecting and couldn't come up with a half way decent example.
 
When I was looking over their evidence I saw a few sites which said the victim had laid charges against Clanton, but then corrected themselves to say he "intended" to press charges.
That tweet seems to be what they've all based their claim on.


???

"Is" and "intend" = the same thing here. I don't see anyone correcting themselves... You seem to be rooting for this guy or something.
 
I don't see any comparison, the video did in fact spark of international protests. Looks like you're purely deflecting and couldn't come up with a half way decent example.

If you see no comparison that's on you for not paying attention to what I was comparing it to and the direction I went with it. That you're alluding to me deflecting for some unknown reason sounds like a deflection on your part.

Unless you're denying it was shitty for Obama/Clinton to point the finger at the guy? Isn't your gripe here people without all the facts using a form of media to persecute someone who might be innocent? At least in my example he was (which you acknowledge but try to deflect by saying other irrelevant protests took place). Remains to be seen in yours. Wanna bet on if he did it? I'm feeling frisky.



<{UberTS}>
 
I'm just glad nobody takes college faculty seriously anymore

Lots of things to complain about nowadays but that's one area of progress
 
???

"Is" and "intend" = the same thing here. I don't see anyone correcting themselves... You seem to be rooting for this guy or something.

It's in the link I provided.
The guy that actually assaulted someone deserves to be charged, but I'm not a fan of unsubstantiated claims being proliferated by social media.
Including here on this forum.
 
That guy's video did troll up global protests, the Benghazi attack just wasn't one of them.
Your government's false claim that the Benghazi attack started with such a protest is a long way from the sort of trial by social media we see here.


lmao, nobody had heard or seen that shitty movie and there no protests because of it. Hillary had her people search YT for something to blame the attack on. End of story. Then the video got exposure.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,308
Messages
58,275,566
Members
175,990
Latest member
gorakk
Back
Top