EPA Head Pruitt was living in Oil Lobbyists DC House at ridiculously low rent...

ShoelessRye

Gold Belt
@Gold
Joined
Oct 18, 2005
Messages
15,273
Reaction score
2
Over about six months in 2017, the AP reported this week, Pruitt paid $50 a night to stay in a Capitol Hill condominium in which three units belong to a corporation co-owned by the wife of J Steven Hart, chair and chief executive of lobbying firm Williams and Jensen.




The firm’s clients include Exxon Mobil and liquefied natural gas exporter Cheniere Energy, both with billions at stake in decisions over which Pruitt presides. At least once while renting the room, Pruitt met a lobbyist from Hart’s firm at the EPA.

A $50-per-night rate is significantly lower than most rentals on Capitol Hill. One-bedroom apartments range between $1,600 and $2,500 a month. Single rooms for one-night rentals average about $120. An EPA ethics lawyer told the AP Pruitt paid only for nights he occupied the room, totaling about $6,000.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/apr/01/epa-chief-scott-pruitt-under-scrutiny-condo-deal

The housing arrangement surfaced on Thursday after ABC News reported that Mr. Pruitt had paid $50 per night to rent a bedroom in a condominium on Capitol Hill for the first half of 2017. The E.P.A. later shared documents with Bloomberg News showing that the arrangement was not a traditional monthly rental agreement; instead Mr. Pruitt paid only for the nights that he slept in the room. His payments amounted to $6,100 over six months.

A typical full studio or one-bedroom apartment in the same area would cost between $1,500 and $2,000 per month or much more, a search of current listings indicates. In a statement, Jahan Wilcox, an E.P.A. spokesman, referred to a memo from the agency’s designated ethics counsel, dated Friday, saying that, “Under the terms of the lease, if the space was utilized for one 30-day month, then the rental cost would be $1,500, which is a reasonable market value.”

Federal ethics rules generally prohibit employees in the executive branch from receiving outside gifts. Mr. Wilcox said the memo showed that the housing arrangement “was not a gift and the lease was consistent with federal ethics regulations.”

Continue reading the main story

Walter M. Shaub Jr., who until last July was the director of the Office of Government Ethics, pointed out that federal ethics guidelines say that “employees should consider declining gifts when they believe that their integrity or impartiality would be questioned if they were to accept the gift.”

According to the E.P.A., the landlord of the building was Vicki Hart, the president and founder of a health care lobbying firm that does not have business before the agency.

Her husband, J. Steven Hart, is the chairman of a Washington lobbying firm, Williams & Jensen, with several energy clients including OGE Energy Corporation, Cheniere Energy and Colonial Pipeline.

According to lobbying disclosure records, Mr. Hart’s firm reported lobbying the E.P.A. on behalf of OGE Energy, an energy company based in Oklahoma, on greenhouse gas regulations and other rules affecting electric utilities. The forms were previously reported by E&E News.

Mr. Hart did not respond to a request for comment.

E&E News reported that Mr. Hart said that he had not personally lobbied the E.P.A. in the past two years and was unaware that his firm had done so, and that a federal disclosure form listing him as having lobbied the E.P.A. on behalf of a glass-container manufacturer was an error that he would ask to have corrected.

Democrats in Congress were quick to criticize the agency chief. “From the very beginning, Scott Pruitt has acted as if the E.P.A. is his own personal fiefdom,” Representative John Sarbanes, Democrat of Maryland, who sits on the House committee that oversees the agency, said in a statement.

Mr. Pruitt’s relationships with both Mr. Hart and OGE Energy go back several years. In 2014, Mr. Hart held a fund-raising event for Mr. Pruitt while Mr. Pruitt was the attorney general of Oklahoma. The Washington Post quoted Mr. Hart on Friday saying that he was a “casual friend” of Mr. Pruitt’s and hadn’t had contact with him “for many months.”

As Oklahoma attorney general, Mr. Pruitt joined with one of OGE Energy’s subsidiaries, Oklahoma Gas & Electric, to sue the Obama administration over a regional haze rule that would have required coal-fired power plants to install pollution controls. Mr. Pruitt eventually lost his case, which went all the way to the Supreme Court.

In March 2017, Mr. Pruitt met with OGE Energy as well as a lobbyist in Mr. Hart’s firm, according to a copy of his daily schedule that was released last year. Also last year, the E.P.A. asked a federal court to delay the haze rule requirements for Texas. A federal court later denied the request.

Brian Alford, a spokesman for OGE Energy, said the company was previously unaware of Mr. Pruitt’s rental agreement.

Mr. Hart’s firm through the end of 2017 also represented Cheniere Energy, lobbying on issues “related to the export of liquefied natural gas (LNG), approval of LNG exports and export facilities,” according to a disclosure report.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/30/climate/scott-pruitt-epa-rental.html

EPA's inhouse ethics advisor tries to retroactively approve of this arrangement by saying he paid the going rate - which is bullshit because he only paid nightly when he was using it - but it otherwise stayed vacant so he could drop in and use it whenever he was in town. And the other room was never rented either and the place was never listed for rental.

If he stayed there 10 nights he'd play $500, but the other 20 days the place was left open for him to use he never paid for.

He lived there for six months - so say he stayed there a total of 60 nights, that is $3000 for the six month where he had total control of the residence that would have cost us $12,000 if the place was on open market even at a low end area rate of $2000 a month.


You or I couldn't get that rate or arrangement. I'll never understand why these people are so bloody cheap like this and open themselves up ethically to this degree.

Add this to his 30 person security detail (completely unheard of for all prior EPAs), the cone of silence he had built at his EPA office for $30K+, his refusing to fly anything other than first class because of the riff raff and say it with me...

DRAIN.
THAT.
SWAMP.
 
Only the most corrupt people.
Is there anyone on Trumps Cabinet not using taxpayers dollars as an ATM?
The debt grew by a trillion in the last 6 months ,Trump wants a fucking parade and his cabinets spend taxpayers money like an NBA player in a strip club.
The right went from family values and hating the debt, to making excuses for a married dude raw dogging porn stars and increasing the debt in a booming economy. Fake Conservatives.
 
I wonder if these bribes influenced his work...
 
It's almost like Trump encourages this kind of behaviour among his cabinet by being a grifter. They see him helping himself and think they can do it to.
 
It's almost like Trump encourages this kind of behaviour among his cabinet by being a grifter. They see him helping himself and think they can do it to.

Chris Christie is saying that the transition team vetting was a non-existent gong show. He said Pruitt should have never been hired and when he was running the TT he wasn't even considered, but when Kushner had Christie fired from it that the ethics vetting disappeared. This is Bridgegate Chris Christie talking shit on Trump Admin about their lack of ethics.
 
Everything Trump touches turns to shit. I think we have enough evidence to support this at this point
 
Chris Christie is saying that the transition team vetting was a non-existent gong show. He said Pruitt should have never been hired and when he was running the TT he wasn't even considered, but when Kushner had Christie fired from it that the ethics vetting disappeared. This is Bridgegate Chris Christie talking shit on Trump Admin about their lack of ethics.

Things are bad when Christie is the ethical person in the transition team.
That's like having Heinrich Himmler in your transition team and he is the one concerned with the level of antisemitism.
 
Only the most corrupt people.
Is there anyone on Trumps Cabinet not using taxpayers dollars as an ATM?
The debt grew by a trillion in the last 6 months ,Trump wants a fucking parade and his cabinets spend taxpayers money like an NBA player in a strip club.
The right went from family values and hating the debt, to making excuses for a married dude raw dogging porn stars and increasing the debt in a booming economy. Fake Conservatives.
Why are you acting like these types of issues just started last year? Do you actually want improvement, or do you just mindlessly use everything as an opportunity to shit on Trump.
 
Let's be honest- a $6,000 gift isn't going to bring anyone down but it's good this stuff is being reported
 
Why are you acting like these types of issues just started last year? Do you actually want improvement, or do you just mindlessly use everything as an opportunity to shit on Trump.
This kind of sleaze and corruption is worse than it's been than decades-the only administrations in the last century that had comparable cabinet-level behavior were Nixon and Harding. Stop trying to normalize it. Yes, it's happened before. That's irrelevant to whether people should point out when it happens.
 
Let's be honest- a $6,000 gift isn't going to bring anyone down but it's good this stuff is being reported
Than why take that discount? If it's a piddly sum that doesn't mean nothing - than why not pay the legit market rate? Why can't federal employees accept even free meals - those are much less than $6000.
 
Why are you acting like these types of issues just started last year? Do you actually want improvement, or do you just mindlessly use everything as an opportunity to shit on Trump.
Where and who? Just more attempt at normalization of Trump Admin race to the absolute bottom on everything.
Price and Shulkin already gone, Zinke, Carson, Pruitt, Mnuchin all have pretty galling OTT expense issues as well, and that is completely ignoring Trump and Kushner.
 
Than why take that discount? If it's a piddly sum that doesn't mean nothing - than why not pay the legit market rate? Why can't federal employees accept even free meals - those are much less than $6000.
I don't agree with it I'm just saying this story won't amount to anything.

It's like all bribery and corruption is politics- if we got serious about it and started throwing people in jail, we'd have no representation because 80% of Congress would be in prison.
 
I don't agree with it I'm just saying this story won't amount to anything.

It's like all bribery and corruption is politics- if we got serious about it and started throwing people in jail, we'd have no representation because 80% of Congress would be in prison.

So should it not be pointed out and discussed? Should it just be allowed to escalate with each election to greater and greater extremes, to where politicians aren't even making the attempt to hide how crooked they are?

Because that is what is happening now - no attempt or fucks are given and the corruption is flaunted and then excused as "well that happened before so who cares now?"
 
Where and who? Just more attempt at normalization of Trump Admin race to the absolute bottom on everything.
Price and Shulkin already gone, Zinke, Carson, Pruitt, Mnuchin all have pretty galling OTT expense issues as well, and that is completely ignoring Trump and Kushner.
That response made absolutely no sense. It would help to actually address the points made. That's how a discussion works.
 
This kind of sleaze and corruption is worse than it's been than decades-the only administrations in the last century that had comparable cabinet-level behavior were Nixon and Harding. Stop trying to normalize it. Yes, it's happened before. That's irrelevant to whether people should point out when it happens.
This fundamental issue is not about cabinet level behavior, it's about corruption in politics. This type of shit is commonplace, across party lines. But again, it's going to be hard to see that if you're a partisan fanatic.
 
So should it not be pointed out and discussed? Should it just be allowed to escalate with each election to greater and greater extremes, to where politicians aren't even making the attempt to hide how crooked they are?

Because that is what is happening now - no attempt or fucks are given and the corruption is flaunted and then excused as "well that happened before so who cares now?"
It absolutely should be. I'm just being pessimistic about any chance at this story going anywhere.
 
That response made absolutely no sense. It would help to actually address the points made. That's how a discussion works.
You claim it happens all the time and just run of the mill politics and being used to shit on Trump. If it is so run of the mill you should have a plethora of names from past administrations readily at your fingertips. How can you expect "improvement" if you think calling it out is just to "shit on Trump"?

Show me an administration who lost two cabinet secretaries, and have 4-5 more under ethics investigations for grift/expensive spending 15 months into a administration.

How many cabinet secretaries did Obama lose to ethics violations? Bush, Clinton, Bush, Reagan, Carter...
 
Back
Top