elizabeth phillips is actually right

UFC hires judges, they don't tell them how to score the fights. She lost because she was stalling and playing it safe. THE END

Well... they did remove a judge because he didn't score it how Dana saw it, tonight... so, yeah... that's pretty much telling them how to score the fights.
 
If you were going to rigg any fight it most certainly wouldn't be this one. Nice try
 
If you were going to rigg any fight it most certainly wouldn't be this one. Nice try

actually that would be the perfect fight to rig because nobody would suspect it

props to liz for speaking truth to power

they just fucked with the wrong indian
 
since she clearly won the fight under every possible judging criteria in the world this just serves as the proof of continuing corruption

are we supposed to ignore the corruption because it happened to an undercard fighter?

it wasnt clear to me
 
since she clearly won the fight under every possible judging criteria in the world this just serves as the proof of continuing corruption

are we supposed to ignore the corruption because it happened to an undercard fighter?
it was a terrible fight. the judges probably stopped watching.

plus, phillips was moving backwards doing nothing most of the fight.
 
You realize the ufc removed the judge because of his scoring during the fights right?

The ufc should get some credit,ive never seen any other commission remove an incompetent judge

actually that would be the perfect fight to rig because nobody would suspect it

props to liz for speaking truth to power

they just fucked with the wrong indian

She lost. She can appeal it but she still lost. Never let it go to the judges
 
Right or wrong she handled herself unprofessionally. Pearson got screwed harder and he didn't even cause a ruckus this big.
 
Well... they did remove a judge because he didn't score it how Dana saw it, tonight... so, yeah... that's pretty much telling them how to score the fights.

lol what they didn't remove him because he didn't score the same way as dana he was removed because he scored first two fight so poorly specially the 2nd fight the reception from everyone was really bad massive booing etc and he was probably the judge that scored first fight 30-27 for Milana (i mean I can see milana winning but 30-27 is pretty extreme)

and this example(of them removing judge) is actually for phillips your saying they removing this judge because they felt he wronged philips is actually shows they are corrupt and support phillips argument lol the contradiction.
 
lol what they didn't remove him because he didn't score the same way as dana he was removed because he scored first two fight so poorly specially the 2nd fight the reception from everyone was really bad massive booing etc and he was probably the judge that scored first fight 30-27 for Milana (i mean I can see milana winning but 30-27 is pretty extreme)

and this example(of them removing judge) is actually for phillips your saying they removing this judge because they felt he wronged philips is actually shows they are corrupt and support phillips argument lol the contradiction.

is english your second language?
 
lol what they didn't remove him because he didn't score the same way as dana he was removed because he scored first two fight so poorly specially the 2nd fight the reception from everyone was really bad massive booing etc and he was probably the judge that scored first fight 30-27 for Milana (i mean I can see milana winning but 30-27 is pretty extreme)

and this example(of them removing judge) is actually for phillips your saying they removing this judge because they felt he wronged philips is actually shows they are corrupt and support phillips argument lol the contradiction.

Except I write say anything about anything you've implied I wrote.

When the promoter starts removing judges mid event because he scored the fights 'poorly,' that's a huge issue. He'd never get away with it in the US.

And if you can't figure out WHY that's a huge issue, I really can't help you.
 
If she was in top position for the entire fight and stalled her way to a decision...

Then she deserved to lose, real talk.
 
actually that would be the perfect fight to rig because nobody would suspect it

props to liz for speaking truth to power

they just fucked with the wrong indian

What exactly would the UFC or this judge get from this? Like there's literally nothing to gain from it so there's no reason to do this. It would be like rigging the celebrity basketball all star game, it doesn't affect anything at all
 
There wouldn't be any issue if she tried actually fighting to get the win. That other girl initiated nearly every bit of action in the whole fight. She was extremely sloppy, but she was trying to win the fight.
 
It's a conspiracy. They wanted... what's the other girl's name? Anyway, they wanted the other girl to win. That's why they put it on the prelims of a fight pass card in China at the ass crack off dawn so not that many people would be watching as their evil plot unfolded.

Trolling much :rolleyes:
 
Except I write say anything about anything you've implied I wrote.

When the promoter starts removing judges mid event because he scored the fights 'poorly,' that's a huge issue. He'd never get away with it in the US.

And if you can't figure out WHY that's a huge issue, I really can't help you.

I didn't say it was the correct thing to do or if there wouldn't be any problems I replied to your comment about dana that is all. 2nd part maybe you didn't imply it but this thread was about that topic(being rigged etc) so at least removing the judge part certainly isn't rigging against philips as donkey implied.
 
All Elizabeth had was reversals and top position. The russian landed the best shots in the fight, the russian landed the takedowns and throws, and the russian lookied for submissions. Honestly, I don't care who won that fight but elizabeth did nothing except sit in the russians guard.
 
Back
Top