- Joined
- Apr 3, 2002
- Messages
- 34,901
- Reaction score
- 38,960
I don't fault his position. His companies future literally hangs in the balance between the truth and alternative facts. The other sticky situation he's in is that opening up his system for audit could give bad actors insight into how these machines really work or the coding behind them. As an election security professional (pretending here), that would be the last thing I would invite.
wow, that sounds like a CT dude. You need to chill out. I think they are saying there should do a full audit in multiple states. I dunno about this whole bad actor stuff... this election is super super secure. But he is saying this audit would check