Elections Election Fraud update - evidence coming in so fast we can't keep up

Status
Not open for further replies.
ElKarlo said:
Just amazed at how the leftists here seem to think it is funny that the accountability and safety of the elections is in doubt. No chain of custody, no ability to see if these ballots were cast by the people who's names are on them. On top of there being thousands of ballots found. Plus the whole assigning 6,000 votes to Biden from Trump in Michigan. This is obviously a CF, and they just can't keep their lips off of the shaft of MSM long enough to see anything at all.
Click to expand...
giphy.gif
 
cottagecheesefan said:
I am not sure about the elector, they did mentioned NV was one of their targets. I saw that their state senate and house are Democrat controlled tho, so now sure how that influences their options there.
Click to expand...
Are you ok with faithless electors giving their electoral college votes to Trump?
 
ElKarlo said:
Just amazed at how the leftists here seem to think it is funny that the accountability and safety of the elections is in doubt. No chain of custody, no ability to see if these ballots were cast by the people who's names are on them. On top of there being thousands of ballots found. Plus the whole assigning 6,000 votes to Biden from Trump in Michigan. This is obviously a CF, and they just can't keep their lips off of the shaft of MSM long enough to see anything at all.
Click to expand...
It's amazing that you are gullible enough to buy all the bullshit trump sells you , the election was fine .
 
This is open and shut. Now it is just a matter of whether lawmakers and judges will have a spine.
 
Bloody Pulp said:
Sidney Powell will be e-filing her GA case soon. 100+ pages with exhibits. Will be entertaining no matter what, I suppose.
Click to expand...
I know sometimes with a big project it takes a day or two past deadline (in this situation however, I would probably have sought to under-promise and over-deliver for best effect), but I have seen her say Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday as to when she was cranking it up. I know some stuff went down today, but I haven't really kept up for a couple nights after work.
Is it supposed to hit Friday, now?
 
deltapapha said:
This is open and shut. Now it is just a matter of whether lawmakers and judges will have a spine.
Click to expand...
I agree, but do you think they will? I don't. Did I miss something today?
 
ElKarlo said:
I agree.. The Reps were lazy. But this is an actual problem. The mail in ballots and the REEEE IDs for voting is racism has made things far worse. You can't do much if one side is acting like everything is racism and Covid doom
Click to expand...
You can't do much if one side is claiming fraud instead of accepting defeat and conceding like every other candidate ever.
 
Damien Karras said:
You believe it's legal? This would send the country into a constitutional crisis
Click to expand...

Believe what is legal? He poised a loaded question without any real substance? Adding stuff like "faithless electors" just shows the inherent bias of his question. If it is through legal pathways, that supports the opposite of being faithless, as it is based on law

It would be like me saying "do you support the governor illegally pushing through an executive order that allowed 700k fraudulent votes, despite state law makers being against it?" Adding that fraudulent part, and the faithless part just loads the question.

As you said, this is a constitutional crisis, at least in PA at this point as the state congress is bringing up their constitutional rights. So, are you opposed to state congressional/law makers using their state and/or federal constitutional rights? As this is the most pertinent question for the context of what they are trying to do.
 
cottagecheesefan said:
Believe what is legal? He poised a loaded question without any real substance? Adding stuff like "faithless electors" just shows the inherent bias of his question. If it is through legal pathways, that supports the opposite of being faithless, as it is based on law

It would be like me saying "do you support the governor illegally pushing through an executive order that allowed 700k fraudulent votes, despite state law makers being against it?" Adding that fraudulent part, and the faithless part just loads the question.

As you said, this is a constitutional crisis, at least in PA at this point as the state congress is bringing up their constitutional rights. So, are you opposed to state congressional/law makers using their state and/or federal constitutional rights? As this is the most pertinent question for the context of what they are trying to do.
Click to expand...
leave it to a leftist to teach you about faith, the arrogance
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,239,439
Messages
55,631,744
Members
174,861
Latest member
Luminous Knight

Share this page

Back
Top