- Joined
- Oct 18, 2010
- Messages
- 10,906
- Reaction score
- 8,133
I mean, they easiest solution is the boomers die and free up a ton of real estate.
I mean, they easiest solution is the boomers die and free up a ton of real estate.
Correct . It involves doing nothing but waitingThat's the easiest?
Correct . It involves doing nothing but waiting

Can't they just progressively tax each house a person (or company) owns?
So your first house has very low taxes, because you need a place to live.
But of you own a second house, it's taxed a little higher. A third house is taxed even more, a 4th house even more than that, and so on.
That way more people can afford a first house but if they want to keep using homes as income properties then at some point it no longer makes economic sense.
You wouldn't have people trying to own 50 houses, nor would you have big corporations buying thousands of homes and driving up the prices.
What would be the drawback?
Lol no. Simply stated for once on sherdog.Oh. I thought you were going in a COMPLETELY different direction with that.
![]()
Hey!! Own 4 houses. SCREEEEEEW YOOOOU.Can't they just progressively tax each house a person (or company) owns?
So your first house has very low taxes, because you need a place to live.
But of you own a second house, it's taxed a little higher. A third house is taxed even more, a 4th house even more than that, and so on.
That way more people can afford a first house but if they want to keep using homes as income properties then at some point it no longer makes economic sense.
You wouldn't have people trying to own 50 houses, nor would you have big corporations buying thousands of homes and driving up the prices.
What would be the drawback?
Gotdam...no....blaming it on the boomers while conglomerates buy up neighborhoods. This forum is really dumb.I mean, they easiest solution is the boomers die and free up a ton of real estate.
Rape a few women and girls and you are golden. Grab them in the pussy.Easy solution to the housing crisis. Take everyone without a house and feed them to the people on SNAP. Two birds one stone, amirite?
Honestly I could get the 2028 republican nomination with that platform.
I didnt blame it on the boomers. Your just having a schizo episode and talking to yourself again.Gotdam...no....blaming it on the boomers while conglomerates buy up neighborhoods. This forum is really dumb.
*You're.I didnt blame it on the boomers. Your just having a schizo episode and talking to yourself again.
Your talking to people who want landlords to eat these type of costs with no way of recouping the money or raising rent. They're not serious people.i think people who have never owned a home will be shocked if/when they do. We had to replace two different HVAC systems in our rentals in one summer. that was not cheap. And i still need to replace the water heater and hvac in the home i live in as the water heater is 15 years old (about 5 older than expected lifespan) and the HVAC system is ancient and terribly inefficient. i wish a i had landlord to pay for this shit.
Schizophrenia ***You're.
Don't even get me started on dumbass tenants. I had one that called me because the pipes were clogged in the house. I asked how did that happen and they said that they were peeling potatoes and putting the peels down the drain. I was amazed at how stupid they were and I wanted to tell them they should call a plumber themselves or move outYour talking to people who want landlords to eat these type of costs with no way of recouping the money or raising rent. They're not serious people.
Yeah I dunno how people do it. Props to you guys. Id just sell the properties recoup the money on the sale and let these people live on the streets.Don't even get me started on dumbass tenants. I had one that called me because the pipes were clogged in the house. I asked how did that happen and they said that they were peeling potatoes and putting the peels down the drain. I was amazed at how stupid they were and I wanted to tell them they should call a plumber themselves or move out
Lolol.You guys will think of anything to avoid just letting people build more houses won't you?
No it wouldn't. Because everyone can rent and buy from people who only have a 2nd house. That will keep prices low. Someone with a 20th house can't rent it out as cheaply, so they'll have trouble finding tenants, and end up just selling the house because it's not worth having that many houses.