- Joined
- Jan 29, 2015
- Messages
- 62,759
- Reaction score
- 31
I'm guessing there'll be an indictment coming before longI would have expected this to have actually led somewhere by now if they found something
I'm guessing there'll be an indictment coming before longI would have expected this to have actually led somewhere by now if they found something
It's as if they can't read an article.So the NSA were listening in on the Russians and picked up Manafort in 2014 when he got on their payroll (which he lied about). They opened up a criminal investigation on him, and kept wiretaps opening.
And somehow, drumphers are calling this a win because it validates Trump's "they wiretapped trump tower" (which they didn't).
Fuck this is just sad.
What is there about communism that you like so much?
Trump said Obama wiretapped him. This is the Comey FBI with a FISA Court Warrant wiretapping Paul Manafort.
Nothing, which is why I consider Putin favorable over most western leaders. Did you misread?
Yes.So does this mean that trump was right when he said he was wiretapped?
Yes.
The president has now been completely vindicated in this instance.
Manafort was living in Trump Tower at the time of the wiretap.
Therefore, any electronic communication between Manafort and President Trump (then candidate Trump), has now been proven to be wiretapped.
A presidential candidate was being wiretapped by his political opposition. This is a scandal of the highest order. Coincidentally, the only people that won't see this as a scandal will be partisan Democrats, and a few "wannabe moderates" (a.k.a. Democrats in sheep's clothing).
NO , it does not.So does this mean that trump was right when he said he was wiretapped?
If they had enough for an indictment from the wiretap, the raid of his home wouldn't have been necessary.Wouldn't any illegally obtained evidence be thrown out though? It looks like someone thinks they can act on the info gained from the wiretapping.
It's just been proven that Manafort was wiretapped within Trump Tower.NO , it does not.
Trump's own DOJ said there is no evidence for the wiretapping claims Trump made.
Wouldn't any illegally obtained evidence be thrown out though? It looks like someone thinks they can act on the info gained from the wiretapping.
Well let's expand on your logic here for a second. So one of two scenarios come out of this-So the NSA were listening in on the Russians and picked up Manafort in 2014 when he got on their payroll (which he lied about). They opened up a criminal investigation on him, and kept wiretaps opening.
And somehow, drumphers are calling this a win because it validates Trump's "they wiretapped trump tower" (which they didn't).
Fuck this is just sad.
Well let's expand on your logic here for a second. So one of two scenarios come out of this-
Either they were "wiretapping" Manafort and he did something illegal during the election, which they would have been able to immediately get another warrant for Trump if it related to Russia collusion.
Or
They "wiretapped" Manafort and didn't find any evidence of collusion with Russia and Trump was wrong that he was "wiretapped" because there was no evidence against him.
BTW lol at you still symantics arguing. Shows how weak your stance is.
...the Democrats can at least pat themselves on the back and tell themselves that they got someone for something.
I've often suspected something similar.I wouldn't put it past some of them to want revenge for the Republicans doing the same thing to Bill Clinton
It's not like Trump ever communicated with Manafort or anything.......
Your concession that President Trump's assertion of wiretapping was correct, is noted.It's not the FBI's fault Trump is busy communicating with a bunch of dirty scum suckers.