Jinzumkei
Rock El Columbian
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2004
- Messages
- 4,693
- Reaction score
- 0
Lol, somehow you're STILL missing the point. It's not whether or not instructionals are still being sold or not, it's whether or not the pirating hurts the sales of that instructional. I'd argue that it does, your argument is that either it doesn't or even more ludicrous it somehow helps the sale.sheet music, readily available online, guides how to play, yet books are still out there being sold, even thou as you put it
Ok that means nothing. It's possible they could have gotten into it when it did make it to TV anyway. Or what if they went to vacation in the states and saw it. The notion that mma owes its success to piracy is lunacy.For instance the Swedish UFC fighters got into the sport years and years before it was on TV here, heck 2 of them they got into it when it barely was on TV in the US
Whether or not you're a good enough teacher to share the knowledge has nothing to do with this argument. In fact that kinda shits on your point about helping the "scene".Well if my sharing the knowledge suffices that knowledge can't have been much worth to begin with and they deserve to fail
Instructionals covers loads of stuff that are both already available, free or not free
We can't be making exceptions for certain types of media
The argument is whether or not piracy hurts sales. I believe that it does, and have given several logical points about my theory. My goal is to show that this issue is very complex and to apply moral absolutes to it is a silly excercise.