Donald Trump Jr.'s Russia email scandal shakes the presidency, v5: NOTHING ILLEGAL

Status
Not open for further replies.
Overpressure said:
I hate that this is a retort.

It does however glaringly reveal how empty the initial statement is.
"No charges from the investigation that's hardly begun yet because junior is still revealing shit nobody knew but were going to discover".
Click to expand...

I quite enjoy flinging the same shit back at these retards.
 
Rational Poster said:
Trolling isn't joking. We already had this discussion.
Click to expand...

This isn't "joking" either:

Rational Poster said:
I hope they make up a new law just to charge them with it.

This type of activity is just unprecedented in US government/US election history so there is no law for it.

It's like one part political espionage and one part violation of the Logan act.
Click to expand...

There is no "joke" in that statement, nor did you even try to defend it as one. It took a whole day, and your quote to be plastered in the OP for you to start flailing in defense. That's fuckin' hilarious.

You know, if you don't want to continuously defend and downplay the stupid shit you say, then stop saying stupid shit.
 
Rematch said:
It's nothing in regards to it not being illegal.
Click to expand...
So far.
It's not a wise basket to put all the eggs into when not everything is known and the principles can't seem to get their stories straight and are telling us "This is everything" when it isn't.
We would never have known about this but for diligent reporting by JOURNALISTS doing the job of JOURNALISM in spite of LYING POLITICIANS
 
Rational Poster said:
Geez dude, let it go.

It was a joke.
Click to expand...
I don't think so.
This is exactly the kind of "legal only because precedent hasn't been set" thing that gets laws and statutes tightened.
Maybe even named.
I like the "Donald Trump Colluding Against America" act
 
Overpressure said:
I don't think so.
This is exactly the kind of "legal only because precedent hasn't been set" thing that gets laws and statutes tightened.
Maybe even named.
I like the "Donald Trump Colluding Against America" act
Click to expand...

Oh for sure, and that's what I was getting at.

But I don't think they're allowed to create a law and then charge someone with it.

They'll pick something else to get them with and then the first action during the next Congress will be the "Don't Collude with Russian You Traitor Fucks Act"
 
Last edited:
Rational Poster said:
Yeah it does.

It means our countries are in dispute legally by definition.

We just slapped two new series of sanctions on Russia this year. They're not going away while they still occupy Crimea without some kind of real bargain.

Not just between US and Russia, but Russia and the rest of the world.

Russia broke an international treaty to occupy Crimea.
Click to expand...

You said HOSTILE! Hostile countries do not engage in trade

"Because of gasoline imports, the United States has a large trade deficit with Russia. In 2017, exports were worth $742.07 million while imports totaled $2.24 billion."

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrob...humbs-down-on-exxonmobil-waiver/#5e5516812657

Trump will soon put an end to all the sanctions on his Russian friends, bless trump
 
P3hPyR3.jpg



Can't trust Trump... he's a liar! :D:D:D
 
DespicablePeep said:
You said HOSTILE! Hostile countries do not engage in trade

"Because of gasoline imports, the United States has a large trade deficit with Russia. In 2017, exports were worth $742.07 million while imports totaled $2.24 billion."

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrob...humbs-down-on-exxonmobil-waiver/#5e5516812657

Trump will soon put an end to all the sanctions on his Russian friends, bless trump
Click to expand...

I never said hostile, that was you and @Edison Carasio

We are in dispute with Russia over them breaking international treaties.
 
Rational Poster said:
I never said hostile, that was you and @Edison Carasio

We are in dispute with Russia over them breaking international treaties.
Click to expand...

We've been fighting proxy wars with Russia for over 50 years, and currently have been in Syria. I consider that hostile (and they would be right to consider us hostile). Just because we aren't making open threats of nuclear war (like we did just 35 years ago) doesn't mean we are friendly with them.

Just my take.

The one benefit I thought we would get from Trump would be working with them on Syria. But the neocons he's surrounded by have decided to strike Assad instead.
 
TheComebackKid said:
It is true most politicians/campaigns would have taken the meeting. It's not true that most politicians/campaigns would build a private server in their home, delete thousands of emails, smash blackberries with hammers, set up a massive pay for play foundation, and sell off American interests to the highest bidder.

Total the same thing :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
It is the same thing. The same BS you guys keep posting trying to absolve Trump's campaign and deflect to irrelevant Hillary talking points.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,248
Messages
57,977,455
Members
175,890
Latest member
Tfracjocon

Share this page

Back
Top