- Joined
- Sep 3, 2014
- Messages
- 26,874
- Reaction score
- 66,802
Well the rebuttal's pretty easy. (4 Paragraphs later... so "easy") In fact, it's been given to you half a dozen times already. (... and each time you've been talking out of your ass) You always refuse to respond and then leave the thread to repeat the stupid question somewhere else. (Not true... you're answer has always been a joke and pure Left Cult talking points. You have no original thought, just what you are told by the Rachel Maddow... or someone like her.) So buckle up kiddo, and remember, this rebuttal isn't for you, it's for the people you are trying to lie to:
The crime in question is a violation of campaign finance laws. (New York has no ability to bring that charge and DID NOT bring that charge. You're talking out of your ass. All they brought was bookkeeping charges.) Specifically, that you disclose what you spend any campaign funds on. (Your lawyer paying off a Porn Star with an NDA in place to protect your family is a valid response and negates anything down this stupid line you just shared which came from idiots like Rachel Maddow.) So when trump didn't disclose that he spent over six figures paying hush money to a porn star, he was in violation of said law. (No.... he wasn't. John Edwards did far worse. Where was the charge? Hillary Clinton did far worse with the Steele Dossier, while based in New York. Where was the charge?)
So, if you believe Trumps version that the payment by Cohen was just done out of the goodness of his heart, you'd vote not guilty. However if you believe the testimony from Cohen that he paid on behalf of trump; the testimony of the EIC of the National Inquirer that he killed stories after being paid by Cohen; the testimony from the porn star trump had to pay in order to get laid, where she admits to taking that same figure from the Inquirer; numerous counts of conversations between the parties discussing these payments; and numerous financial statements outlying these payments; then you'd vote guilty. (Nothing. Nothing. Nothing. Nothing. Absolutely nothing that Cohen shared is credible. The man wouldn't know the truth if it bit him on the ass and the U.S. Congress and a court have both confirmed as much. He's not a witness that counts for anything you dumb fuck. How are you this stupid?)
So there you go again old man. For the 7th time now, I've explained how you were wrong. Furthermore, and we've been over this before, you keep trying to tell us that all of trumps cases should be dismissed because you can't identify the underlying crime. Whatever right wing dipshit keeps saying this is lying to you. (You just self owned yet again dipshit, but thanks for playing.)
My Comments... in red.
ROFL... you're such an idiot.