• Xenforo Cloud has scheduled an upgrade to XenForo version 2.2.16. This will take place on or shortly after the following date and time: Jul 05, 2024 at 05:00 PM (PT) There shouldn't be any downtime, as it's just a maintenance release. More info here

Crime Donald Trump Hush Money Fraud Trial (5/30 Update: Trump Found Guilty on All 34 Felony Charges)

Well the rebuttal's pretty easy. (4 Paragraphs later... so "easy") In fact, it's been given to you half a dozen times already. (... and each time you've been talking out of your ass) You always refuse to respond and then leave the thread to repeat the stupid question somewhere else. (Not true... you're answer has always been a joke and pure Left Cult talking points. You have no original thought, just what you are told by the Rachel Maddow... or someone like her.) So buckle up kiddo, and remember, this rebuttal isn't for you, it's for the people you are trying to lie to:

The crime in question is a violation of campaign finance laws. (New York has no ability to bring that charge and DID NOT bring that charge. You're talking out of your ass. All they brought was bookkeeping charges.) Specifically, that you disclose what you spend any campaign funds on. (Your lawyer paying off a Porn Star with an NDA in place to protect your family is a valid response and negates anything down this stupid line you just shared which came from idiots like Rachel Maddow.) So when trump didn't disclose that he spent over six figures paying hush money to a porn star, he was in violation of said law. (No.... he wasn't. John Edwards did far worse. Where was the charge? Hillary Clinton did far worse with the Steele Dossier, while based in New York. Where was the charge?)

So, if you believe Trumps version that the payment by Cohen was just done out of the goodness of his heart, you'd vote not guilty. However if you believe the testimony from Cohen that he paid on behalf of trump; the testimony of the EIC of the National Inquirer that he killed stories after being paid by Cohen; the testimony from the porn star trump had to pay in order to get laid, where she admits to taking that same figure from the Inquirer; numerous counts of conversations between the parties discussing these payments; and numerous financial statements outlying these payments; then you'd vote guilty. (Nothing. Nothing. Nothing. Nothing. Absolutely nothing that Cohen shared is credible. The man wouldn't know the truth if it bit him on the ass and the U.S. Congress and a court have both confirmed as much. He's not a witness that counts for anything you dumb fuck. How are you this stupid?)

So there you go again old man. For the 7th time now, I've explained how you were wrong. Furthermore, and we've been over this before, you keep trying to tell us that all of trumps cases should be dismissed because you can't identify the underlying crime. Whatever right wing dipshit keeps saying this is lying to you. (You just self owned yet again dipshit, but thanks for playing.)

My Comments... in red.

ROFL... you're such an idiot.
 
Thank you ever so much for saving me the trouble.

You always duck out. You had to have Curry Junkie put his ass on the line for your cowardice. You started it and it ends with him losing his account because of your big dumb mouth.
 
My Comments... in red.


(Nothing. Nothing. Nothing. Nothing. Absolutely nothing that Cohen shared is credible. The man wouldn't know the truth if it bit him on the ass and the U.S. Congress and a court have both confirmed as much. He's not a witness that counts for anything you dumb fuck. How are you this stupid?)

I know. Everyone who has anything bad to say about daddy is a liar. Problem is, Cohen's story is backed up by numerous conversations he had with paying off the Inquirer to kill the story; and numerous financial statements showing payments from Cohen to the Inquirer and then reimbursements from Trump.

Trump's rebuttal that Cohen just did that on his own initiative for no reason, is retarded.




(Your lawyer paying off a Porn Star with an NDA in place to protect your family is a valid response and negates anything down this stupid line you just shared which came from idiots like Rachel Maddow.)

Idiocy. Only a trump supporter would consider hush money payments to a porn star should be categorized as run of the mill attorneys fees.

So no sport, that's not gonna count as a lawful disclosure.
 
Well the rebuttal's pretty easy. In fact, it's been given to you half a dozen times already. You always refuse to respond and then leave the thread to repeat the stupid question somewhere else. So buckle up kiddo, and remember, this rebuttal isn't for you, it's for the people you are trying to lie to:

The crime in question is a violation of campaign finance laws. Specifically, that you disclose what you spend any campaign funds on. So when trump didn't disclose that he spent over six figures paying hush money to a porn star, he was in violation of said law.

So, if you believe Trumps version that the payment by Cohen was just done out of the goodness of his heart, you'd vote not guilty. However if you believe the testimony from Cohen that he paid on behalf of trump; the testimony of the EIC of the National Inquirer that he killed stories after being paid by Cohen; the testimony from the porn star trump had to pay in order to get laid, where she admits to taking that same figure from the Inquirer; numerous counts of conversations between the parties discussing these payments; and numerous financial statements outlying these payments; then you'd vote guilty.

So there you go again old man. For the 7th time now, I've explained how you were wrong. Furthermore, and we've been over this before, you keep trying to tell us that all of trumps cases should be dismissed because you can't identify the underlying crime. Whatever right wing dipshit keeps saying this is lying to you.
That's one of the viable associated crimes, but I think they will present a buffet in summation/closing.
 
Cannon will hear this, stipulating that she will grant Smith's request if and only when all charges against Trump are dropped in all cases and he's made America's King 4Lyfe...otherwise, she'll hear it in 4 months then issue her decision on it prior to 2030...

Not verbatim language, but close.
I don’t trust the courts, either.
 
If the law is it's only election interference if there's NOT a equally reasonable reason why the mo ey was paid. Trump has a 30 year history documented of doing just that for family and business reasons . If that's the law then what law was broken?
 
If the law is it's only election interference if there's NOT a equally reasonable reason why the mo ey was paid. Trump has a 30 year history documented of doing just that for family and business reasons . If that's the law then what law was broken?
If you don't "get it" by now, you are too stupid to learn. Sorry, for your genes, champion.
 
Memorial Day??? Oh, so I should whine about myself and my family's "sacrifice" right?

Jesus tiny-D is such a cunt.

Couple of thoughts.... you seem to have some legal questions., Donnie.. perhaps ask one of your many MANY lawyers. They get paid to explain basic shit to you. (But not "pretty" Alina, 'cause she doesn't know either)

Also, for a guy who has sued so very many people over the years, how the fuck do you not know how the legal system works? I guess you really ARE just "the dumbest g'damned student" William T. Kelley ever had.

Lastly, about your comments on E. Jean Carrol today.....you want to have trial #3??? Could be a summary judgement this time, and triple the last judgement again will put you at broke o' clock.

Shut your fucking mouth.


I would post this on "Truth" social but I a) would like these comments to live past years end, and....lets face it, "Truth" is circling the bowl.
b) I don't want my computer to get E-Aids.
 
Last edited:
I'm glad this won't be shown/broadcast b/c I'd have to skip work to listen to the culmination of this thing.
By the end of this week, or the next, we will almost certainly have a verdict, and if he is found guilty, after maybe another week or two, a sentence/judgement.

So it begins. If Scrotus gets it's shit together, the DC trial will be next.


Oh, assorted dingii... no, this is not IT, it's just the beginning... lol.
 
youd think a guy who has spent so much suing and getting sued would know how it works unless hes just whining just to whine. Which he likes to do
I guess the extent of his knowledge is that bluster and threats to sue are the sum total of his legal knowledge, that and hiring ambulance chasers ...
 
youd think a guy who has spent so much suing and getting sued would know how it works unless hes just whining just to whine. Which he likes to do


oh he's aware of it. but he had no defense to make in his name inside of a court of law or even in the courtroom of social media, so little baby boo hoo has just gotta keep on stamping his feet and throwing his shit at the wall and putting on his perpetual victimhood act in front of all of the losers who support him.

gotta keep on pushing the whackadoodle narrative that he invented that he's somehow the victim and not the perpetrator, and all of this is just some kind of deep state pizzagate witch hunting charade where he's the target of an unfair justice system and all of that other fairytale nonsense that he will never ever go out of his way to try to prove.

his supporters are on the spectrum of course, and plenty of them will gobble that kind of shit all up. "it's just so unfair that my rapist cult messiah was not given special privileges and allowed to get the last word in during his new york criminal trial. it's just so rigged! lawfare, lawfare i say, to the likes of which we've never seen before."
 
Last edited:
Back
Top