Do you think Emma Watson has hit "The Wall?"

[Long Dark Blues]

Looks like she got work done or something.

The pics from that evening aren't flattering at all.

 

[fungi]

.

Girl, look at that body...

 

[TeTe]

Never saw the appeal in the first place, but probably not a fair pic to judge off of.

Plus, most of the time we're only seeing these celebs on TV under perfect lighting while loaded with makeup. I'm sure (as we've seen before) that most of these celebs look like crap without the lighting and makeup.

 

[BayAreaGuy]

Certain women in Hollywood tend to age faster because A) they smile and laugh for living B) they constantly wear heavy makeup for movies and pictures C) busy scheduales and periods of little sleep and/or stress

Those factors age you faster, especially the laughing/smiling.

 

[Cherry Brigand]

Those factors age you faster, especially the laughing/smiling.

Do you mean because of 'laugh lines'?

 

[fingercuffs]

Same boat as you. Never thought she was that special but I'm not gonna rip on her looks and she absolutely 100% stabbed JK Rowling in the back for no reason.

She wouldn't have a platform to spew it all if it weren't for JK Rowling, and I despise hatred for LGBTQ.

 

[Red Beard]

LOL he sucked

 

[Vergilius]

She wouldn't have a platform to spew it all if it weren't for JK Rowling, and I despise hatred for LGBTQ.

Yeah, and the thing is: Rowling doesn't hate LBTQ+ at all. She isn't transphobic either, in any real sense of hating trans. She just disagrees that being trans should automatically grant you access to all women exclusive spaces, because women who are biologically born as women have a right to feel comfortable and have an experience of the world that transwomen don't necessarily have access to. Now, you could disagree with and challenge that position, sure, but to cancel and disavow her because of that? This is simply not acceptable behaviour in my book.

The "official quidditch" league is dropping the name of quidditch to distance itself from Rowling and she can't even appear in the 10 year anniversary special to celebrate the films. Those are two of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard. And people like the Potter kids are partially responsible because they poured gasoline on the fire rather than taking a "disagree but still respect you" position. F*ck em.

 

[MoparOrNoCar]

She looks like a smoker to me. Women that have a bunch of fine lines like that are always heavy smokers.

 

[IndyCovaHart]

ok weeb

 

[Fedorgasm]

She just turned 30. Do you think she has hit "The Wall?"

She looks like that hot girl that rejected you in high school but now years later tracked you down online to give you a shot now that she's all used up.

 

[Deleted member 449757]

Her legs are still surprisingly delicious in relation to the rest of her body. Kind of impressive, really.

She looks more like Victoria Beckham than Hermoine Granger.

What type of fucking name is this anyway?

 

[lostdog000]

still plenty hot and bonus points for lack of plastic surgeries

 

[DespicablePeep]

She always looked older than she was, ugly cunt

She just turned 30. Do you think she has hit "The Wall?"

 

[DespicablePeep]

Giangantic forehead, no lips, still ugly

It's just a bad photo, this is the same night.

 

[Darth_Inv1ctu5]

Never really got the lust for her
She's cutish but I wouldn't think of her as hot as heck but there's loads of guys that think she's nice so what do I know. Horses for courses.

Before this meth pic she'd have been on a first class ticket to Pound Town, she hot af.

 

[ripsta619]

She looks like a smoker to me. Women that have a bunch of fine lines like that are always heavy smokers.

Definitely smokes cigs. Possible coke and booze in there as well but definitely cigs.

 

[Merlotte's]

It’s not a bad photo like some are saying. She’s close up. Not very cute anymore. Looks like Chelsea Handler.

 

[Fungilicious82]

She looks like the crypt keeper hood lord

 

[Darth_Inv1ctu5]

Yeah, and the thing is: Rowling doesn't hate LBTQ+ at all. She isn't transphobic either, in any real sense of hating trans. She just disagrees that being trans should automatically grant you access to all women exclusive spaces, because women who are biologically born as women have a right to feel comfortable and have an experience of the world that transwomen don't necessarily have access to. Now, you could disagree with and challenge that position, sure, but to cancel and disavow her because of that? This is simply not acceptable behaviour in my book.

The "official quidditch" league is dropping the name of quidditch to distance itself from Rowling and she can't even appear in the 10 year anniversary special to celebrate the films. Those are two of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard. And people like the Potter kids are partially responsible because they poured gasoline on the fire rather than taking a "disagree but still respect you" position. F*ck em.

There's very few things that have the same rejuvenating effect as the tears of G.R.R. Martin fans clamoring for the next book and asserting that they are "owed" a book, and one of those things are the tears of the HP fans clamoring for the erasure of JKR from HP canon. The level of entitlement exhibited by these people would be staggering if it weren't sad. You know you're fucking up badly when your behavior inspires neutrals like myself to root against you. I couldn't give less of a fuck about HP universe, but this made me root for JKR.