• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Law Do you support Zohan Mamdani's call for ban of AR15s?

This is like saying mosquitoes are more dangerous than polar bears because they are responsible for up to 1 million human deaths per year. Thats true but that argument is very narrow in its application.

The AR is a lightweight alloy, chambers at least 20 rounds, is designed to be carried dozens of kilometers daily, quick aiming (especially with a tactical sling) for close or medium-quarters combat. It's designed to kill a lot of people in a short time quick and snappy. Now compare that to your dad's revolver..

Having a rusty Glock 22 around your protruding belly for 20 years doesn’t make you an expert on guns. Just shut your mouth and listen to your experts on topics you're ignorant about.

It’s not like comparing mosquitos to polar bears because mosquitos don’t kill you right away. A handgun will do it just as quickly as a rifle, just not from as far away. Again, fuckstick, you’re not teaching me anything about guns. And it wasn’t a Glock, it was a smith and Wesson M&P .40. And lol at my protruding gut. You don’t know shit. Unlike you and other pussies, I have posted my pics in here and in other threads proving I am not fat and that I am that rare poster that actually benches 365-though, not since surgeries.
 
High capacity, auto or semi-auto rifles are WAY more effective combat arms. Politicians lobby for their removal for one reason: complete control of the population..
Yeah, many of them can be propagandized into thinking it’s about crime and “protecting the citizens”.
The folks at the top know exactly what they’re doing.
 
Yeah, but my gun is just as effective as yours. There is a disconnect with you in that you are skilled with weapons. The overwhelming majority doesn't know how to handle guns properly and more importantly don't realize mortality.

You are/were LEO, right? I can't imagine you guys want to walk up on a vehicle that you have stopped and the odds are better that they have a gun.

The proliferation of guns makes us more unsafe. It's a fact. If you live in a household with a firearm you are much more likely to die by a firearm, and don't get me started on the suicide rate.

I get it, and I realize that there is no easy answer, but we are dying. Americans are dying. Cigarettes were a problem back in the day, right? Why aren't gun manufacturers held to that same standard? As someone was saying here, if Mexico got cut off from the gun supply then the big gun companies would go bankrupt.

They deal in death, and business is fantastic. There is never a shortage of gangsters doing gangster shit. Strawman purchases to let the cartels keep killing each other while on the other hand we vilify the people using those guns. We are giving them the means to do it and we are getting a steady supply of coke, brown, and fenty. This world is so fucked.



Ok. Where to start. Yeah, I am a retired LEO. I never had a problem doing a traffic stop with a legal firearm owner in the car. I simply told them if I don’t see yours, you won’t see mine. It always got a laugh and a “oh god no.”

Firearms manufacturers should not be held to the same standard as tobacco companies because the guns are doing exactly what they were designed to do and if they do that, then the product works. It’s not the gun manufacturing companies’ fault that someone chose to use their weapons in a criminal manner. Cigarette companies hid the dangers of smoking for decades. It’s not the same.

And let’s say we outlawed guns tomorrow and everyone turned their guns in. The criminals would not and now they know that no homeowners have guns, so they would have no fear breaking into homes and robbing people or worse. I am not giving up my guns. Period. Point. Blank. I don’t have a lot, but I like the thought of knowing I can protect my family if things ever go down. Not really an issue in my nice ass neighborhood. I don’t carry anymore. I spent way too much time with a gun on my hip. But I would like to be able to exercise my second amendment constitutional rights if I choose to.

And yes, people ar dying, and it’s awful, but all the shitheads with firearms that are felons or underage need to held responsible with long sentences.

It’s juveniles and felons with firearms that are your most likely shooters. Age groups 18-24, 17-30, and 18-20 are the groups most likely to commit gun crime. 17-30 covers the most shootings with only a few outliers outside of that age group. 18-24 is where most of your shootings occur. And people aged 18-20 are three times more likely to commit gun crime than other groups, however, juveniles under 17 are the fastest rising group with 14 and 15 year olds becoming increasingly involved in gun crimes.

Out of an average of 20,000 murders every year, 54% of victims are black with 89% of the offenders being black. So that’s over 10,000 black murders/year with almost all the shooters being black. Of the less than 10k white murders, 79% of the murderers are white. This proves two things. 1. We tend to murder within our own race. And 2. Black shootings and shooters are ridiculously and overwhelmingly punching above their weight class and over represented in all gun categories. and when we break it down even further, into percentages, black males are far more likely to be shooters than women, which means that 6% of the population are responsible for 54% of murders or just over 10k murders/year.

White mass shooters/school shooters get All The attention, but there are 100 people murdered per day by firearms which is about 7-10 school shootings worth of victims/day. And almost all of those firearms murders are handguns.

And this doesn’t even touch the approximately 100k non fatal shootings/year. I can’t find the stats on that, but I read that once. And again, even more disproportionately, it’s black suspects and black victims. And these numbers don’t count the number of firearm related crimes where no one is shot for example, armed car jackings or robberies on the streets.

You know whose not doing these shootings? Legal gun owners. So you want to punish and suspend the constitutional rights of law abiding Americans based on the actions of shitheads with guns?

I have a solution and two stories. First, the story. My first felony arrest was serving a warrant on a guy that shot someone else. His name was Michael but everyone called him “diddy”. He was on parole and showed up at his probation officers office for a visit and we were waiting to serve the warrant on him. We arrested him without incident and he ended up getting convicted of that crime. He was already a felon and he got the absolute lowest sentence for a felony that he could get. We called them 1+1 crimes where they serve exactly 1 year (mandatory minimum for felony) and 1 day. The day he got out, he went right after the guy he shot before he was locked up and tried to shoot him again and they got into a shootout in the streets. Now this time, he got a little bit more than a 1+1, but not much.

The second story involves a guy I had been arresting since he was a juvenile. He was caught with guns while he was a juvenile and little was done. His name was Chuckie (street name, “blackie”)He was a drug dealer and some crack whore stole his drugs. He tracked her down to a house, knocked on the door and then fired 8 shots through the door before kicking in the door and dragging the girl outside. He then held the gun to her head and pulled the trigger but the gun misfired and by then, he heard the sirens and ran. He was later caught and convicted and served a 1+1. The very night that he got out, he went to a club and there was a shooting where some dude named “spoon” got shot in the gut. We heard the shots and were only a block away. We pulled up and jumped out of the car seeing spoon lying on the ground across the street. I start approaching him when I see some guy take a shooter’s stance and started ahooting at us. I heard bullets whizzing above my head. We took cover and he took off running.

We gave out his description and he was picked up running a block away(more on that in a minute). After he ran away, I went up to spoon and put my hand over his wound u til fire department could get there. While I had my hand on his wound, his shitbag friends blamed the police for their friend getting shot because we couldn’t control the Cleveland thugs that shot him. They then start spitting on the back of my bald head. FD arrives and takes him and then a very large riot breaks out. There are six of us, 8 if you count the two with the shooter. The riot is so bad that the Lt orders the other unit to release the shooting suspect and respond to our scene. He had no gun on him because he threw it on the roof of a business and it was found later that year. The only way to tie him to the shooting was to do a gun shot residue on his hands and arms, but the tests were at HQ. So he is released and the two officers come to the scene of the riot and we eventually get things under control.(the riot is a hell of a story by itself).

Guess who the shooter was….Chuckie/blackie out fresh from his 1+1 and he got away with shooting at me because the prosecutor said “no gun, no gsr, no charges” even though I saw him shooting at me.

So, I tell you these two stories because they both involve shootings, and felons with firearms and a juvenile with firearms. As you can see, the justice system doesn’t do its job in locking away offenders when they are caught. Murder and shooting rates have a pathetic clearance rate in most big cities.

Almost all of our murders have been guys from Cleveland, your hometown, and why I hate your hometown (not because of you, I like you-but because of your criminals in my town) I have done hundreds upon hundreds of Triple I’s on suspects from Cleveland. A triple I is an FBI report of every time a suspect has ever been fingerprinted. All arrest data when a suspect is fingerprinted is sent to the FBI. It includes convictions as well as arrests with no convictions. Every single triple I that I have run on someone from Cleveland has been pages upon pages of arrests. Every single one had felonies and convictions on them. Most had “malicious wounding with a firearm” and “robbery with firearm specification” and I would look at the time served and they would say six months, or 18 months, or 24 months. All very short sentences for the gun crimes being committed. In Philly, the DA larry krasner (lowercase letters because I don’t respect him) refuses to charge juveniles as adults or prosecute felons with firearms. Why? Because he said in a news conference I used to post but can’t find it right now, that he refuses to prosecute these cases because they ALL involve black or brown suspects and there are already too many of those locked up. So he refuses to prosecute these cases two biggest groups of offenders of guns crimes-juveniles and felons for carrying guns. Meanwhile, his streets are running red with blood. He does, however, blame the NRA for promoting a culture of violence and blames other states for their lax gun laws which he says are flooding his streets with guns.


My solution is simple. If you are a juvenile caught with a gun, you get locked up for at least two years, possibly until the age of 21. If you are a felon with a firearm, you get an automatic 5 years. If you commit a gun crime where no one is shot, ten years in prison. If you are involved in a shooting, you get a min of fifteen years if it is non fatal. If you’re a felon with a firearm and you shoot someone, 20 years. If you murder someone with a firearm, 30-life depending on criminal history.

You don’t need to punish law abiding citizens with super restrictive gun laws, you simply need to harshly punish the gun offenders. And you need to focus on the most likely groups to shoot people. We need better education and need to focus more resources in poverty stricken areas, since that is where the most shootings take place.


Edit: I thought I was responding to @WklySportsMemes eho is from Cleveland. Sorry to both.


https://ammo.com/research/gun-violence-among-black-americans

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/72/wr/mm7226a9.htm

https://thegunzone.com/what-age-group-commits-the-most-gun-violence/
 
Absolutely. Will it ever happen? Not in this country.
And before all the weeping and flailing starts, I don't want to ban the 2nd Amendment, I just think you need some firearms training if you have to rely on an AR15 for self defense.
 
Absolutely. Will it ever happen? Not in this country.
And before all the weeping and flailing starts, I don't want to ban the 2nd Amendment, I just think you need some firearms training if you have to rely on an AR15 for self defense.

Its called picking the right tool for the right job. No one is seen carries a rifle for self-defense in any normal situation. However they are the tool for certain situations.

By the way i have had a lot of firearms training on rifle, shotgun and handgun.
 
Tell me which one of these is an "assault weapon ".

Featured_AR-15_vs_Ruger_Mini-14-052722.jpg
 
Its called picking the right tool for the right job. No one is seen carries a rifle for self-defense in any normal situation. However they are the tool for certain situations.

By the way i have had a lot of firearms training on rifle, shotgun and handgun.
Which situations are there where an AR15 is the only solution?
 
Which situations are there where an AR15 is the only solution?

Nothing is the only i said best. I find its great for taking out coyotes. In certain situations it would be best for home defense. With the right ammo and Lazer sight its hard to beat. It has limits if you have close neighbors but if you have a bit space and the right ammo it will do the job more effective then a handgun.

By the way this is a actual "assault weapon".

M7_Rifle.png


Can you tell the difference.
 
Nothing is the only i said best. I find its great for taking out coyotes. In certain situations it would be best for home defense. With the right ammo and Lazer sight its hard to beat. It has limits if you have close neighbors but if you have a bit space and the right ammo it will do the job more effective then a handgun.

By the way this is a actual "assault weapon".

M7_Rifle.png


Can you tell the difference.
I live in a small very red town in the desert full of Mango Molester Muppets with a gigantic amount of Coyotes. Even here they don't need AR15s to keep the Coyote population down.

And lol at needing an AR15 for home defence.
 
I live in a small very red town in the desert full of Mango Molester Muppets with a gigantic amount of Coyotes. Even here they don't need AR15s to keep the Coyote population down.

And lol at needing an AR15 for home defence.

You live in California they can't have an "assault weapon" so they are stuck with they can have be it the best tool or not.
 
I live in a small very red town in the desert full of Mango Molester Muppets with a gigantic amount of Coyotes. Even here they don't need AR15s to keep the Coyote population down.

And lol at needing an AR15 for home defence.
An AR15 isn't some crazy powerful weapon. It fires a .223 Remington, which is a pretty light load. It's on the lighter end of calibers to hunt deer with. My only problem would be with magazine capacity, but that seems so arbitrary.
 
An AR15 isn't some crazy powerful weapon. It fires a .223 Remington, which is a pretty light load. It's on the lighter end of calibers to hunt deer with. My only problem would be with magazine capacity, but that seems so arbitrary.
As hunting I can get on board with, we're not all equipped with archery skills, but as home defence? Ridiculous.
 
Why would they need one to take out Coyotes?

Because with a 4x12 its a great tool to fo the job.

If you are asking why take them out they are a nuisance and the population is out of control in places like here. They kill all kinds of domestic animals.
 
Because with a 4x12 its a great tool to fo the job.

If you are asking why take them out they are a nuisance and the population is out of control in places like here. They kill all kinds of domestic animals.
So everyone here's doing a terrible job with Coyotes? Worse than you in the Carolinas? I have domestic pets, it's mainly the terrible drivers I don't let them out but a lot to do with Coyotes, thankfully we're quite a close community so there's a FBook alert if Coyotes are spotted.

And lol at the dig with "expert". I nearly caved and bought a firearm which Eamon didn't really want but it sure as fuck wouldn't have needed to be something like that. HE'd have laughed at me for suggesting it.
 
It's not a home defense weapon. You can shoot through 4 walls with that round and strike your own family. In a pinch it's better than nothing, though.
Of course. Something's better than nothing if you're geared up that way. But as a necessity over other firearms...lol.
 
Because with a 4x12 its a great tool to fo the job.

If you are asking why take them out they are a nuisance and the population is out of control in places like here. They kill all kinds of domestic animals.
People kill coyotes on the Outer Banks, sadly, and it has let the deer population get out of control. They serve an important purpose. I do understand why ranchers take them out, but otherwise they should be left to do what they do.
 
It's not a home defense weapon. You can shoot through 4 walls with that round and strike your own family. In a pinch it's better than nothing, though.

Tell the pentration of say a 9mm or say number 1 buckshot. Its about angle and direction more then anything.

Oif its so bad why do cops use it when gong in a house after someone.
 
Back
Top